
Originally Posted by
vanschen
nice quote.
MAY = possibly.
if indertiminacy is freedom. then human c should arise from quantum c. but human c is different from quantum c. quantum c obeys the Uncertainty P which we dont normally experience. UP is insignificant in the mesoscopic level - the human level. though UP is reflected in a "situation" like claustrophobia - a spread wave when a particle is pinned down in a small space [Greene,s idea]. and in eureka [new: now that's funny] in Archimedes [my idea]. generally, thought spreads emotions and emotions spreads thought. though this and other situations reflect the UP, it does not in all situations. like when you drive and see the GPS map of where you are and where youre going [though my teacher told us that because of the UP you should think instead: " i know where im going but i dont know where i am. i know where i am but i dont know where i am going." this is impractical and much less pathological. [maybe true if its about life!]
so i think, just my junk idea since i dont have any PHd, human consciousness is in between the indeterminate [quantum] and determinate [macroscopic]. this is the idea behind string theory and loop quantum gravity, that is to unify both micro and macro. maybe one day we,ll read a paper citing string theory or LQG by cognitive scientists.
this is just a joke: if we were take the idea of quantum consiousness to its extreme then we,d all be with OCDs.
yes yes, the first line is a thought. that struck me, i forgot about that "gap." but yeh, that is why, one must postulate of a medium in between , speculations speculations

speculations arises from speculations.
There must be a correspondence between the planck level and newtons' world, for after all, isn't that what particle physicists and astrophysicist are trying to achieve (and hope) when their marriage gave birth to quantum gravity, there must be some corresponding connection beyond the current perceived limitations to the field.
exactly, not all situations - Limit-Situations. we all have to live with it i guess.
or then again, consciousness could just be a joke in a way that it baffled humankind for a couple of centuries and then a guy comes over and tell us what it actually is, demonstrates and lectures that it really is just a trifle, only that we were seeking the answers in the wrong place, in all that it was just right under our noses. hehehe.
then at the end, there would be no deviation, since all of us are the same.