How do we really know God exists... The Bible Answers

[handsoff241]

---

again ha, read slowly.
Sakto ka nga gikinahanglan cyag common sense.
The fact nga gikinahanglan pa, meaning naai kulang in the first place.

Unsa ang kulang?
kung unsa imong gipuno, common sense.

Mao ra na akong point.

wala siyay kuwang.
how? the law itself already makes sense.
why do we need to use common sense?
because of today's complexity in lifestyle and in law, we need to make it sensible to the people and the environment. we need the common sense to use it properly. not the law itself.

[Saint_hard]

common sense lagi gamita bah..saun nakaau na!!!

[nikxz unÖ]

check again sir

Identify what proof means, then define science on its scope definition
By just the definition alone, there is no any scientific proof of gawd

[schmuck]

common sense lagi gamita bah..saun nakaau na!!!

question for you,

in biblical times, a man was stoned to death for gathering sticks on the sabbath.
we wouldn't dare to the same thing to that man now.

why is that?

*please don't jump the gun and think I'm asking a stupid question.

[munzter666]

Diest na si Einsteen Bro .... He believe in the Espinoza God concept.

etats....basog ma LASTIMOSA pod unya ni.

Einstein does not believe in biblegod...he is no atheist either. refer to SPINOZA's God, better yet try reading its CONCEPT. compare that to biblegod....BIG DIFFERENCE.

Einstein despised fundies like you for doing such things back when he was still alive. give the dead guy some peace.

such a cop out attempt trying to bring a dead genius to your fold. lols

[Hellblazer 2.1]

common sense lagi gamita bah..saun nakaau na!!!

i know you.

[handsoff241]

Identify what proof means, then define science on its scope definition
By just the definition alone, there is no any scientific proof of gawd

ahh wait... did i mention this specifically?
since it's in front of me i will lick it...

science is too young to deny the possibility of explaining God.
and i quote from : Can Science Prove the Existence of God? - The New York Times

But Laplace also had an answer. The planets, he proposed, had congealed from a swirling cloud of gas and dust surrounding the sun. O.K., so where did the sun and the mother cloud come from? And what set the whole thing revolving?

God... can be invoked to account for phenomena that have not yet yielded to the scientific method

[nikxz unÖ]

Science, based on physical reality ( can be examined and evaluated ), deals with natural explaination, and its a big NO NO for science answering things with another unknowable or another mystery.

You can use science as an evidence for gawd's existence if you change its definition and ulterior motive but it will just turned out that is not science anymore

[Saint_hard]

question for you,

in biblical times, a man was stoned to death for gathering sticks on the sabbath.
we wouldn't dare to the same thing to that man now.

why is that?

*please don't jump the gun and think I'm asking a stupid question.

People had evolve bro...even us gentiles do accept reform.

[schmuck]

false dichotomy man ang ending points sa article

In the end, the answer is either ''just because'' or ''for God made it so.'' Take your pick.

pwede man nga "We don't know, yet".