dili kay kinahanglan ug sentido common para matarogn ug gamit dili pasabot nga wala na puy tarung nga sentido ang 10 ka balaod. mga"basic" ra tawn ang prinples ana oi.. kung tang tangon ang 2 ka first commandments, makita nimo nga the othe 8 are so basic that they cover everything.
and the rest of the complication comes from humans.
not the bible, the post you quotedSo you want me to read the bible as historical proof of the bible itself? That doesn't sound logical at all.
you call it semantic, i call it my reasoning. i never said "exclusive", but rather the point where it is openly accepted as how it should be.let's not go into semantics here. like I said.. Man's understanding of a divine/supreme or whatever you want to call it.... its not exclusive to religion nor to science.
jfgi sir.. you will see it.Since when has religion used science to prove itself? It is science which has disproved religious beliefs time and time again... religion has had to change its beliefs because of scientific findings.
if you read and understand, you will get the idea,,, seems like you need to understand what you are reading before you react on it. yes i am not good with words, i was not serious with my studies anyway, but does not mean, i failed to give ample time to think of what i am saying.What exactly is your point?... seems like you weren't listening to that seminar as you can't even explain your points clearly... I'm sorry but "blah blah blah" won't cut the mustard bro.
look, if you want to get your points across.. you better take time to compose your posts and make sure you know what you're talking about... otherwise, don't bother posting it here.
*sigh* so be it...I am not here to debate / argue with you. I am here to engage in an intelligent discussions and valid exchange of points and ideas..
jfgi .. you will see
Similar Threads |
|