hands, munzter's point is exactly that.
you attacked the "appropriateness" of what he said instead of posting counter arguments. Attempted to divert the discussion to being about the "appropriateness" of his post.
Red Herring fallacy.
lol, there was nothing to counter with a phrase, that says bible has raping and looting and pillaging and such; it was already refuted ages ago, and the way he wrote it was my point cause the content itself is way too battered for it to be a subject again.
i know i have two choices, to parry the content or the way it was written and as to my comprehension the one that needs (as of now) is the way.
and it was not he, it was my decision to counter his appropriateness.
what did you mean by refuted? refuted nga wala nahitabo?
no that he should at least respect.. lol it did happen even i admit it did.
"Silence, I kill you" hehe Joke...
that doesnt really count as a refutation hands.
those things HAPPENED, doesnt refute what i said.
instead you referred me as an uneducated person for making such comments, FYI if I was uneducated, I wouldn't made such comment.
somewhat like facts you cant argue.no that he should at least respect.. lol it did happen even i admit it did.![]()
Similar Threads |
|