
Originally Posted by
The_Child
suppose a write a book entitled: "I have a cat named Fifi and why salvador dali was a stigmatist in the no-boundary proposal of Hawkings"
suppose that in this book: i wrote about 500 pages on why i ahve a cat named fifi, on why salvador dali was a stigmatist and what it has to do with the uncertainty principle of Heisenberg
suppose that: i have 1,000 footnotes, with a bibliography citing, Planck, Schroeniger, the dadaists literatures, james joyce, the whole lot of de Chardin, whitehead, Bergson, nabert, lavelle, an idiot guide to cats, an idiot guide to surrealism, the tel quel publications ....
the question is; does my book, of great length and famous references make any sense? Or does it even ha any point? even if it is categorized as non-fiction?