Starseed: The Third Millennium : Living in the Posthistoric

[regnauld]

---

it is not a quarrel between newton or einstein. its not even physics in the first place. There is a difference between physical time and human time. the former, physics, the latter, history. they are different things sir. when you talk about historical events, you do not use quantum mechanics, the level of symbols and subjectivity which is in history, human time, the time we are talking about, does not belong to quantum mechanics.

that is why i said, i hope you dont use quantum mechanics, if you dont intend to explain the connection.

you conflate the two which must not be so.

and besides that very question i am posing goes against all this in the first place, i.e, how could there be historical events (the assumption for the term post-historical) in a state of mind (that which you are mentioning) that bypasses time in the first place?

The TRUTH IS everything is connected.

You are where your attention takes you. In fact, you are your attention. If your attention is fragmented, you are fragmented. When your attention is in the past, you are in the past. When your attention is in the present moment, you are in the Presence of God and God is present in you. Let yourself die to what really does not exist and discover what does.

[The_Child]

The TRUTH IS everything is connected.

You are where your attention takes you. In fact, you are your attention. If your attention is fragmented, you are fragmented. When your attention is in the past, you are in the past. When your attention is in the present moment, you are in the Presence of God and God is present in you. Let yourself die to what really does not exist and discover what does.

you love to juggle in forums dont you

apparently this has no connection with the topic.

[regnauld]

you love to juggle in forums dont you

apparently this has no connection with the topic.

I see connection where you don't . That is the difference. I think you are viewing from the top and I am viewing from below.

[The_Child]

no. im just against, in principle, the attempt to make things correct through an attempt to a fancy rhetoric.

[regnauld]

no. im just against, in principle, the attempt to make things correct through an attempt to a fancy rhetoric.

You are right in your POV! Does that diminish my views?

[Hellblazer 2.1]

unsa ning starseed, mr.regnauld? science fiction?

[regnauld]

unsa ning starseed, mr.regnauld? science fiction?

I'd love to think this book as FICTION but it is actually NON FICTION for one of its basis can be found from the book "The Phenomenon of Man" by: Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, SJ.

[xiao-xiao]

when mn kunuhay ni mahitabo ning starseed thingy? 2012? nyahaha

[regnauld]

when mn kunuhay ni mahitabo ning starseed thingy? 2012? nyahaha

It's been here since the 2ist century and it's happening now again and again!

[The_Child]

I'd love to think this book as FICTION but it is actually NON FICTION for one of its basis can be found from the book "The Phenomenon of Man" by: Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, SJ.

suppose a write a book entitled: "I have a cat named Fifi and why salvador dali was a stigmatist in the no-boundary proposal of Hawkings"

suppose that in this book: i wrote about 500 pages on why i ahve a cat named fifi, on why salvador dali was a stigmatist and what it has to do with the uncertainty principle of Heisenberg

suppose that: i have 1,000 footnotes, with a bibliography citing, Planck, Schroeniger, the dadaists literatures, james joyce, the whole lot of de Chardin, whitehead, Bergson, nabert, lavelle, an idiot guide to cats, an idiot guide to surrealism, the tel quel publications ....

the question is; does my book, of great length and famous references make any sense? Or does it even ha any point? even if it is categorized as non-fiction?