Anthroposophia

[The_Child]

---

I see. Anthroposophy is not a religion but a philosophy and spiritual practice. There are some priests who are Theosophits and Anthrophosophits too.

some priests? they should be excommunicated then.

[regnauld]

some priests? they should be excommunicated then.

There are even priests who are Masons. Ask Flying Fish!

[The_Child]

i know there are. they should be excommunicated, i think they already are.
they do not know where they stand, or they just cant have enough in where they are.

[flying fish]

i know there are. they should be excommunicated, i think they already are.
they do not know where they stand, or they just cant have enough in where they are.

or they have a better understanding now, that to be excomminicatedis a blessing

[bisan-unsa]

naa gamay nlng jud ang mahabilin nga mga pari kung maohon na...

[flying fish]

naa gamay nlng jud ang mahabilin nga mga pari kung maohon na...

he,he,he, by the way bro gamay raman difference sa montesori ug sa anthroposophy(in terms of child education lang kay daghan man ni practices pa sila), but i dont know pirmi man mangaway ang anthroposophical society sa kang montesori,im saying this cause i knw people in the anthroposophy & was able to attend a seminar handled by a german,

ang difference mao ra ni-
anthroposophy believes- that no intervention of childs exploration should ben done in terms of learning, for in doing so you are medliong w/ the natural flow of the divine w/n

Montesori believes- that a child may best express his potentials when guided properly

ps. im using my own words to share the differences

[The_Child]

[QUOTE=flying fish;4187658]or they have a better understanding now, that to be excomminicatedis a blessing[/QUOTE


they have a better understanding? the only regret the church has is the leniency of seminary education they have for these days if that is the case.
If your a Catholic Priest, you need to know where you stand, you need to know your faith, you need to have one, you dont have to be dogmatic, you only need to have faith.

those who dont, are easily tempted to esotericism. the belief for greater knowledge, or for greater power, or for something greater. They are not contented. They do not see that point of it all, man is always tempted to know everything but he cant, he needs to reside to a limitation, and the only way to satiate this resignation to a limitation of human reason is faith. If a priest doesnt have that, he would go and explore2x all kinds of promises for knowledge ,power, etc.

that is why, such things are incompatible with roman catholic priests .

[flying fish]

[quote=The_Child;4188395]

or they have a better understanding now, that to be excomminicatedis a blessing[/QUOTE


they have a better understanding? the only regret the church has is the leniency of seminary education they have for these days if that is the case.
If your a Catholic Priest, you need to know where you stand, you need to know your faith, you need to have one, you dont have to be dogmatic, you only need to have faith.

those who dont, are easily tempted to esotericism. the belief for greater knowledge, or for greater power, or for something greater. They are not contented. They do not see that point of it all, man is always tempted to know everything but he cant, he needs to reside to a limitation, and the only way to satiate this resignation to a limitation of human reason is faith. If a priest doesnt have that, he would go and explore2x all kinds of promises for knowledge ,power, etc.

that is why, such things are incompatible with roman catholic priests .

again thats the difference w/ your world view, you think that ESOTERICISM is for weak people,
w/c i strongly disagree,
for people who are not contented yes i agree, its normal to be discontented, specially when it comes to religion,
if for you are contented with your faith in religion then good for you, im happy for you,
but for people who are not contented, why should you think there somethning wrong w/ them,
maybe they realized that there something wrong w/ the church, a self discovery, w/c historically the catholic church has been doing a lot of unholy things,

i respect your opinion, but im not impressed with its content & most specially w/ your packaging;
if i may use your words its pumpous, mascarading to know somethingn but not quite,

[The_Child]

[QUOTE=flying fish;4188658]

again thats the difference w/ your world view, you think that ESOTERICISM is for weak people,
w/c i strongly disagree,
for people who are not contented yes i agree, its normal to be discontented, specially when it comes to religion,
if for you are contented with your faith in religion then good for you, im happy for you,
but for people who are not contented, why should you think there somethning wrong w/ them,
maybe they realized that there something wrong w/ the church, a self discovery, w/c historically the catholic church has been doing a lot of unholy things,

i respect your opinion, but im not impressed with its content & most specially w/ your packaging;
if i may use your words its pumpous, mascarading to know somethingn but not quite,

who said that i said esotericism is for weak people? again a problem with bias. clear out those biases.

whats wrong with them? because they are priests they made a promise, a commitment, if you break a promise you dont only break away from it but also to yourself and to others. if they cant commit why enter in the first place?
im not masquerading but then if you want to put it that way then fine, of course,your not impressed with it, because you find it as an attack of your principles. and im not here to impress you or the people , i dont give in to popular demand, im here to say my piece on the issue whether your impressed with it or not.

unless of course you are a priest, are you father?

[flying fish]

[quote=The_Child;4188721]

who said that i said esotericism is for weak people? again a problem with bias. clear out those biases.

whats wrong with them? because they are priests they made a promise, a commitment, if you break a promise you dont only break away from it but also to yourself and to others. if they cant commit why enter in the first place?
im not masquerading but then if you want to put it that way then fine, of course,your not impressed with it, because you find it as an attack of your principles. and im not here to impress you or the people , i dont give in to popular demand, im here to say my piece on the issue whether your impressed with it or not.

ah ok your not using the word "weak", so how do you account those people whom you consider as having not commited to their faith, & be easily "tempted" w/ esotericism, so most probably they are strong instead & maybe enlightened?
Say your piece but put a little jesus in their, w/ kindness & consideration if posible,
& again im not impressed w/ your attemt not to make an impression, cause you know i have this bias that at a times people who tries to be unpopular wants attention the most,
just my bias ha, you could be totally different,
& lets end this cause we both know that we know each other so well in some level,