Bisan unsaon ug debate wa jud tay mabuhat ana. Unless e revise and constitution, diha rata pde maka interfere sa church.
Klaro man kaayo noh ang separation of the church and the state? Pero ngano ang Governor sa pampanga Pari man? Ok ra diay cla mag apil2x sa politics (state affairs) niya ang state dili pede mu kastigo nila?
lmao...
Results 11 to 20 of 49
Thread: Tax on church
-
03-03-2009, 12:28 PM #11Junior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
- Posts
- 60
-
03-03-2009, 01:15 PM #12C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Gender
- Posts
- 2,435
Kung mag apil apil man gani ang mga pari sa politiko kani angay e implement.
-
03-03-2009, 01:41 PM #13C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Gender
- Posts
- 2,566
The Church's funds are used for charitable purposes and are freely given. Taxes are MANDATORY and are used to line corrupt politicians' pockets. The Constitution is right to not allow taxation of the Church.
-
03-03-2009, 01:46 PM #14
Religion is not above corruption. Pot, meet kettle.
Last edited by vern; 03-03-2009 at 01:48 PM.
-
03-03-2009, 02:04 PM #15C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Gender
- Posts
- 2,454
sa amu church gni mgpamisa bsta pasko ug new year 500 kda mass...dpat donation ra unta
dn kasal pbayron pka excess sa sponsors 200 per head ang uban mahal pajud....
pwera gaba lng jud noh uban simbahan mangwarta jud tnuod mao na mkalagot na
-
03-03-2009, 02:20 PM #16C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Gender
- Posts
- 2,566
Nothing on this earth is above corruption. But the Church is not anywhere as corrupt as our government. If there is corruption, taxing the Church will not solve it. Frying pan into fire.
Originally Posted by vern
Last edited by mannyamador; 03-03-2009 at 02:27 PM.
-
03-03-2009, 02:42 PM #17C.I.A.
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Gender
- Posts
- 4,472
Thats what they call "DONATIONS"! Originally Posted by ashmae_01
I dont know if The Roman Catholic Church revised the definition of "DONATIONS"...
ilang gi take advantage tawn ang majority sa ilang mga members who are uneducated and ignorants.
FACT!!!!Last edited by flanker; 03-03-2009 at 05:45 PM.
-
03-03-2009, 03:18 PM #18History does not agree with you. Originally Posted by mannyamador
-
03-03-2009, 04:36 PM #19C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Gender
- Posts
- 2,566
Au contraire. I think history does not agree with you. How does one resolve that now? Originally Posted by vern
Last edited by mannyamador; 03-03-2009 at 04:42 PM.
-
03-03-2009, 05:03 PM #20i would agree in some point... Originally Posted by flanker
hehe..freely given jud kaayo ang bayad sa kasal, bunyag, patay.. etc
dako kaayo marka sa Envelope - "DONATION".. then naay "PRESYO" sa kilid.
Donation pana? hehe...
mao ganing perting angal anang simbahan karon sa RH bill kai mo hinay ilang income sa bunyag/kasal/patay..
less population less income... yabong negosyo ni padre.. faet..
Angay jud laparuhon ug tax ang church! kai mga pari abusado na kaayo.. they use God as a marketing tool to deceive the ignorant followers...
TRUE STORY!
bitaw...if donation ranah naa sa simbahan,nganong mahal man og bayad ang kasal sa simbahan...is it because of the papers?and gasto sa kaslonun?hm?...*thinking
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Similar Threads |
|
Posting Permissions
|