Is Creationist Science Worth Believing?

[Hellblazer 2.1]

Impossible. How can hands meet when both are not on the same side of the coin?

Creationism stands on the account of the Bible and postulates on the metaphysical/transcendent side of our origin -- it is therefore NOT SCIENTIFIC.

Evolution stands on the account of inquiry and evidence. Evolution is no longer a hypothesis but a FACT.

i think mr.regnauld has just declared first that they are both sides of the same coin. i think he means that THEY COMPLIMENT EACH OTHER.

[regnauld]

Impossible. How can hands meet when both are not on the same side of the coin?

Creationism stands on the account of the Bible and postulates on the metaphysical/transcendent side of our origin -- it is therefore NOT SCIENTIFIC.

Evolution stands on the account of inquiry and evidence. Evolution is no longer a hypothesis but a FACT.

I think sir creationism goes beyond the book. Who, where, how, when what, cause Evolution in the first place? Nothing? Just pure nothingness and then it exploded into something? Nice Logic!

[rcruman]

Since when did creationism become scientific? Creationist "scientists" even admit that they are not scientific. It's a pseudo-science no less.

Evolution is a fact like gravity.

Evolution is a fact? then how come APES, SINGLE CELLED bacteria still exist?
THousands of years ago still the physical feature of man still the same.

why rely on CREATIONIST SCIENTIST, rely or read again the bible and let the bible explains and answer you not other people.

Ikaw bro ganahan ka lain ang moexplain sa imo prinsipyo?

PEace!

[rcruman]

Impossible. How can hands meet when both are not on the same side of the coin?

Creationism stands on the account of the Bible and postulates on the metaphysical/transcendent side of our origin -- it is therefore NOT SCIENTIFIC.

Evolution stands on the account of inquiry and evidence. Evolution is no longer a hypothesis but a FACT.

have you seen the MISSING LINK bro brownpose?

Peace!

[Hellblazer 2.1]

Evolution is a fact? then how come APES, SINGLE CELLED bacteria still exist?
THousands of years ago still the physical feature of man still the same.

why rely on CREATIONIST SCIENTIST, rely or read again the bible and let the bible explains and answer you not other people.

Ikaw bro ganahan ka lain ang moexplain sa imo prinsipyo?

PEace!

so how do you explain the dinosaurs, rcruman?

[Sinyalan]

Evolution is a fact? then how come APES, SINGLE CELLED bacteria still exist?
THousands of years ago still the physical feature of man still the same.

why rely on CREATIONIST SCIENTIST, rely or read again the bible and let the bible explains and answer you not other people.

Ikaw bro ganahan ka lain ang moexplain sa imo prinsipyo?

PEace!

rcruman... you're holding these questions all the time? Haven't you read all the posts, statements that had been written all over different and related threads? By any chance, do you really read them at all? I think not because you obviously running in circles.

[rcruman]

rcruman... you're holding these questions all the time? Haven't you read all the posts, statements that had been written all over different and related threads? By any chance, do you really read them at all? I think not because you obviously running in circles.

because you're still holding the same understanding.
its like a man who keep on requesting the same song on the radio, so the DJ will play it again as requested.
Yes I do, then how about you have you read all the verses of the bible whom I've posted?

PEace!

[rcruman]

The bible has science (not the entire science).
Evolution is not science its a theory of darwin that haven't proven and keep on insisting a MISSING LINK is missing.

BIBLE agrees with science while the bible doesn't agree with THEORY OF EVOLUTION.

I think you know the meaning of SCIENCE and the theory of EVOLUTION can't be considered as SCIENCE.

PEace!

[Hellblazer 2.1]

The bible has science (not the entire science).
Evolution is not science its a theory of darwin that haven't proven and keep on insisting a MISSING LINK is missing.

BIBLE agrees with science while the bible doesn't agree with THEORY OF EVOLUTION.

I think you know the meaning of SCIENCE and the theory of EVOLUTION can't be considered as SCIENCE.

PEace!

well, many consider it as science. but you, you're only a few group of people who believes otherwise.

[Sinyalan]

because you're still holding the same understanding.
its like a man who keep on requesting the same song on the radio, so the DJ will play it again as requested.
Yes I do, then how about you have you read all the verses of the bible whom I've posted?

PEace!

You're not describing me rcruman, but you're describing yourself.

Let reiterate this again. I read your bible and the need for that is not applicable to mine. But I acknowledge the history in it but I don't believe what your bible is telling to believe there is god. Although, you are an expert in answering a question with a question... so, keep on running in circles, iyawat na lang nga kakita ka ug escape route, okay pre?