If there is a contradiction then it means the bible is not a reliable source for anyone's salvation.
If there is a contradiction then it means the bible is not a reliable source for anyone's salvation.
Oy...ayaw lang og kasuko gud. Nangutana ra gani ta suko naka tsk tsk...
"ang Holy Spirit, dili masipyat. pero ang nagsuwat, ang nag translate, masipyat" Sa ato pa sige ka'g kutlo sa imong Bible nga wa gani ka kahibaw nga sipyat diay na pagkatranslate or sipyat pagkakopya ang kanang imong gikotlo?![]()
![]()
Kung nasipyat pagkasuwat sa writer giunsa diay siya paghung-hung sa Holy Spirit? They must have spoken to the wrong spirit Pein...hahahahaha![]()
Scholar Bart Ehrman's new book explores how scribes -- through both omission and intention -- changed the Bible. Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why is the result of years of reading the texts in their original languages.Ehrman says the modern Bible was shaped by mistakes and intentional alterations that were made by early scribes who copied the texts. In the introduction to Misquoting Jesus, Ehrman writes that when he came to understand this process 30 years ago, it shifted his way of thinking about the Bible. He had been raised as an Evangelical Christian.
Ehrman is also the author of Lost Christianities: The Battle for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew, which chronicles the period before Christianity as we know it, when conflicting ideas about the religion were fighting for prominence in the second and third centuries.
The chairman of the religious studies department at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, Ehrman also edited a collection of the early non-canonical texts from the first centuries after Christ, called Lost Scriptures: Books that Did Not Make It into the New Testament.
Similar Threads |
|