Gaza war

[pspoon_low-end]

---

oh there goes the name. desperate measure sir? attempting to intimidate me with those labels? haha.


this is not worthy of any reply at all.

The point is childish and unfounded. Seeking only to provoke a heated discussion. Can we not talk in a civil way?

what did i do? i didnt call you something. i was referring to the hamas militiamen... oh head... it seems you too are misinterpreting what im saying.

[Malic]

malic, when i said i got your point, i meant that i agreed to your statement that they should let the civilians out first before they fight. agree ko nmu ana.

pero ang di naku ma agree sa imu kung nganu mu ingun ka they can fire wherever they want. u mean bisan naay mga civilians sa kilid or tapad nila nga building, pwede sila mu tira?

and asa naman imu gi ingun diha nga ipapahawa usa ang mga civilians una mag gubat? should you have thought hamas do the evacuation of civilians before they fire their stupid rockets?

now i said it clearly.

Yes they can do that. they can fire wherever they want,even Israel does that. Thats their call.

your next question was asked already by someone,so just scan for the answer na lang.

[Malic]

what did i do? i didnt call you something. i was referring to the hamas militiamen... oh head... it seems you too are misinterpreting what im saying.

then construct your statement in a way that it cant be misinterpreted.

oh that was for the hamas militiamen? poor me.

[pspoon_low-end]

Yes they can do that. they can fire wherever they want,even Israel does that. Thats their call.

your next question was asked already by someone,so just scan for the answer na lang.

by saying they can fire wherever they want EVEN IF THERE ARE CIVILIANS SURROUNDING THEM, then id say to israel "lets get it on!" hehehe

theres just utter disregard for human casualty from u saying they can fire wherever they want.

[DrE]

pls dont take this out of its context. I am simply repeating what you posted. You posted that hamas want to eradicate Israel,and i simply repeated that statement.

oh so you are in favor of starvation? tsk tsk. you are greedy too,haha. You want to starve people too? People like you should be more sensitive to the needs of other people.

I posted it since mao mana ila charter, I did not create such statements. Sila naghimo ana. I am not in favor on anything. I dont have to pick a side. I see it as an observer. I dont go off defending one or the other. Not all people have to be like you.

Yes i am not one sided. I am not for war that will result to civilian casualties.

Yes because the only civilians are the Palestinians man noh? Wa may civilians sa pikas side.

well they can launch their rockets wherever they want.

Then so can Israel.

im just saying they can fire wherever they want.dont stretch the meaning. Im not saying that its not wrong,tsk tsk. You are giving a wrong interpretation of what i said and thats dangerous.

Fair enough. Make it clearer next time.

i never said that an "eye for an eye" is the right course to take. Im saying that IF that is what THEY want(all out war) they must let the civilians evacuate first.

you have a habit of misinterpreting my statement tsk tsk.

Ofcourse its not the right course to take. I was mearly commenting on the philosophy of eye for an eye. Its everything for everything. Civilian per civilian. Soldier per Soldier. Home per home. Hamas wont wait for Israeli civilians to clear. So why do they bother. (If eye for an eye ideal ato gifocus) Im not saying na mao na imo gusto. We both agree di na sakto.

[pspoon_low-end]

then construct your statement in a way that it cant be misinterpreted.

oh that was for the hamas militiamen? poor me.

yes it was for the militiamen. ur not an extremist man sad diba? so dont call yourself one kay i wont say that to anyone unless proven.

[Malic]

by saying they can fire wherever they want EVEN IF THERE ARE CIVILIANS SURROUNDING THEM, then id say to israel "lets get it on!" hehehe

theres just utter disregard for human casualty from u saying they can fire wherever they want.

human casualty can only come if the other side will retaliate w/o thinking.

and thats wrong for you to say that i disregard human casualty. You just failed to see my point.

Isreal fired from a place where there are civilians. whats the difference? thats why i said they can fire wherever they want.

Yeah bring it on...just leave the civilians out.

[pspoon_low-end]

human casualty can only come if the other side will retaliate w/o thinking.

and thats wrong for you to say that i disregard human casualty. You just failed to see my point.

Isreal fired from a place where there are civilians. whats the difference? thats why i said they can fire wherever they want.

Yeah bring it on...just leave the civilians out.

Israel didnt fire from a place where there are civilians. bec they are using helicopter gunships, fighter jets and tanks that are situated in the border. thats way out of the civilian places.

hamas is firing rockets in schools or apartments where their shivering compatriots are stuck inside

and thats the difference.

[Malic]

I posted it since mao mana ila charter, I did not create such statements. Sila naghimo ana. I am not in favor on anything. I dont have to pick a side. I see it as an observer. I dont go off defending one or the other. Not all people have to be like you.

then i simple repeated their charter. and whats that got to do with me? never mind. keep your answer.

Yes because the only civilians are the Palestinians man noh? Wa may civilians sa pikas side.

from the very start i already said that i dont like civilian casualties.

Then so can Israel.

correct!!!

Fair enough. Make it clearer next time.

i thought it was clear. Read it again.

Ofcourse its not the right course to take. I was mearly commenting on the philosophy of eye for an eye. Its everything for everything. Civilian per civilian. Soldier per Soldier. Home per home. Hamas wont wait for Israeli civilians to clear. So why do they bother. (If eye for an eye ideal ato gifocus) Im not saying na mao na imo gusto. We both agree di na sakto.

if we will go through the statistics, Israel made more civilian casualties than Hamas.

I was talking about heavy bombings, not small firings.

[Malic]

Israel didnt fire from a place where there are civilians. bec they are using helicopter gunships, fighter jets and tanks that are situated in the border. thats way out of the civilian places.

hamas is firing rockets in schools or apartments where their shivering compatriots are stuck inside

and thats the difference.

of course they did fire from a palce where there were civilians. Not just this war.

shivering compatriots,hahahahahahaha, you made me laugh with this one.

Never mind...I wanted to say more about the war initiated by Israel agaisnt the hezbollah but i think OT na. so ill keep it na lang.