Mga GARCIA sa Capitol, mga hawod na kaayo.

[giddyboy]

---

Again, the SC can say anything or cite any part of the constitution to make it seem fair but the fact that the lot was not returned and was merely paid 34K plus interest doesn't that raise a question? Do you honestly think that is fair? oh come on?!

unsay "merely" 34K plus interest? gigamayan rka ana? huna hunaa nga 34K na plus LEGAL INTEREST FROM 1947!!! a span of decades! kung tinambanon nato na, it could amount to a few millions!

"legal interest" gani. take note sa term "legal interest". sa ato pa sinubay na sa balaud and not just something hakop ra sa hangin.

You answered your own question. My point was pagbalhin sa lot from MCIAA to CPVDC, then to the Ayalas and that is not a different story. Since sila ang naglingkod, sila ang nangusog.

my point is, why not? Chiongbian was already out of the equation, already paid justifiably, and the rest have repurchased their lots (and possibly resold) by the time the CPVDC transfer was taken.

I was pointing a hypothetical scenario, NOT the Lahug Airport. To reiterate my point, ang government mang expropriate ug mga yuta, human kung di na gamiton for public use, ibaligya sa lain private entity nga mas mobayad ug dako? Wa kay sayop nakita ana?

unsa man diay sayop or problem ana? are u somehow anti-Ayala? or perhaps anti-Lito O? LOLs

dili mana sa kinsa ang mobayad ug dako. it's all about current assessment of the value of the lots and the intended masterplan of the lots. CPVDC decided to transform the old airport to something more benefitable and helpful.

AND LET ME CORRECT MY STATEMENTS that the Ayalas own 100% of the IT Park. it's not. it's CPVDC who owns the property. CPVDC is a joint venture between the Province and the Ayalas...so technically, the lots are still partly owned by the gov't...just like Petron. just like Meralco. get the drift?

actually, kung wala palang untay legal problem c Chiongbian, she could have repurchased her lot just like the rest of the other landowners. Gali lang, naa gyuy problema ang iyaha.

Wa na lang kay ni decide na man ang SC. Asa pa man di'ay na dad-on, sa Congress?

mind u, naabot sa SC pero there were lots of appellations that took place before the final decision.

Kay di pwede i-uli? Sa original tag-iya? Ngano gud? Now, I am laughing... Don't you see a sly legal maneuver there?

i was talking about V Chiongbian's case only. ang iyaha rang lot ang wala na repurchase. the rest nka repurchase. again, di na gyud pwede iuli ang iyang lot.

if u say sly legal maneuver, mas angayan pa na i describe kang V. Chiongbian...

You may not be a relative but you do sound like a loyalist. MAYBE wa sila nidawat ug kickback sa CICC construction and lamp post overpricing? Are you kidding me?

i'm not even close to being a loyalist of Gwen, if that's what u mean. i was just pointing out the SC decision on Chiongbian as fair and square. Period. it's just a matter of who you believe more: Chiongbian or the SC jurisprudence. if it's Chiongbian u believe more, wa natay mahims ana...

I am not a relative of Chiongbian nor do I have interest in those contiguous lots in the old Lahug Airport. I just happen to know what REALLY happened. I am not against the people of the Philippines, I am for what is fair. In that country, people of the Philippines IS THE OFFICIAL SEATING IN POSITION and NOT THE PEOPLE.

if u really knew what happened as to your personal knowledge, the CA, RTC, SC, and the Republic of Phils knows more what really happened than you do. and not half-truths only. they have valid proof all over while u only had presumptions, assumptions, hearsays, and gossip.

to prove, you even are still wondering up to now why Chiongbian can't repurchase the lot, or the lot can't be returned to her. LOLs and i even explained it already...

and why put Gwen in some bad light when in fact CPVDC was not formed under her term? it actually was formed under Lito O's term. abi ky karon raman na materialize ang IT Park under her term? LOLs

[LytSlpr]

unsay "merely" 34K plus interest? gigamayan rka ana? huna hunaa nga 34K na plus LEGAL INTEREST FROM 1947!!! kung tinambanon nato na, it could amount to a few millions!

"legal interest" gani. take note sa term "legal interest". sa ato pa sinubay na sa balaud and not just something hakop ra sa hangin.

But not as much as how much it was currently sold for.

unsa man diay sayop or problem kung ang JPVDC nibaligya sa lot sa Ayalas? are u somehow anti-Ayala? or perhaps anti-Lito O? LOLs

dili mana sa kinsa ang mobayad ug dako. it's all about current assessment of the value of the lots and the intended masterplan of the lots. JPVDC decided to transform the old airport to something more benefitable and helpful.

That's basically goes back to my original question. Government selling expropriated lots to private entities when they are no longer used for the reason they were expropriated for? Dapat gani wala na gipang kaso ng mga lots, gi-uli na lang derecho.

The last time I checked, the government is not into the Real Estate business.

It is good that it became the AsiaTown IT Park. Maayo ug tinguha, sayop ug pama-agi.

actually, kung wala palang untay legal problem c Chiongbian, she could have repurchased her lot just like the rest of the other landowners. Gali lang, naa gyuy problema ang iyaha.

mind u, naabot sa SC pero there were lots of appellations that took place before the final decision.

i was talking about V Chiongbian's case only. ang iyaha rang lot ang wala na repurchase. the rest nka repurchase. again, di na gyud pwede iuli ang iyang lot.

are you sure that si Chiongbian ra ang wa naka repurchase? I don't think so...

if u say sly legal maneuver, mas angayan pa na i describe ni Chiongbian...

Ang original tag iya sa lot ang nag sly legal maneuver? how could that be logically possible?

i'm not even close to being a loyalist of Gwen, if that's what u mean. i was just pointing out the SC decision on Chiongbian as fair and square. Period. it's just a matter of who you believe more: Chiongbian or the SC jurisprudence. if it's Chiongbian, wa natay mahims ana...

if u really knew what happened as to your personal knowledge, the CA, RTC, SC, and the Republic of Phils knows more what really happened than you do. and not half-truths only. they have valid proof all over while u only had presumptions, assumptions, hearsays, and gossip.

LOL, yeah just like a lot of cases in the Philippines. The law is blind. Worst, the law can be bought in the Philippines. PERIOD!

to prove, you even are still wondering up to now why Chiongbian can't repurchase the lot, or the lot can't be returned to her. LOLs and i even explained it already...

I am not wondering why she can't repurchase her lot. I am wondering why it was not returned to her in the first place and everything in between is pure BS by the SC influenced by the personalities with direct interest.

[realfussion]

you guys are talking about some very technical issues and beside the lot selling has happened way back before the Garcia's has taken the Capitol Position... lets get back to the real topic...

[LytSlpr]

you guys are talking about some very technical issues and beside the lot selling has happened way back before the Garcia's has taken the Capitol Position... lets get back to the real topic...

but the transfer to Ayala happened during their time. it only shows how they abused their power.

karon ipabalhin na pud ang Central Command (Camp LapuLapu) kay paliton na ni Ayala. OK ra ni basta way land grabbing mahitabo. kung na'ay titled private lot nga naa sa tunga sa project basin gamitan na pud ni ug eminent domain technicality. hehe!! ingnon lang nga himuon ug roadway. so ang mahitabo ang lots private and dalan public. malas lang ang mga mabiktima.

[giddyboy]

But not much as how much it was currently sold for.

ang ang noh! maningil diay c Chiongbian sa current value when in fact the transaction and transfer to of lot to RP was done decades ago?

That's basically goes back to my original question. Government selling expropriated lots to private entities when they are no longer used for the reason they were expropriated for? Dapat gani wala na gipang kaso ng mga lots, gi-uli na derecho.

again, the owner of the IT PArk is not a private entity. it is a venture between the Province and the Ayalas. there's a big difference there.

are you sure that si Chiongbian ra ang wa naka repurchase? I don't think so...

hala, pangitaa sa SC jurisprudence kung naa bay lain wala nka repurchase. or cite nlng kha ug laing kaso beh.

Ang original tag iya sa lot ang nag sly legal maneuver? how could that be logically possible?

she wanted to repurchase the lot at 34K only when in fact the property was already worth millions. and to add, na approvan pa gyud sa RTC. u don't call that sly legal maneuver? maygani na appeal sa MCIAA and the CA found the judgment in error.

LOL, yeah just like a lot of cases in the Philippines. The law is blind. Worst, the law can be bought in the Philippines. PERIOD!

u cannot argue this one w/ generalities...

I am not wondering why she can't repurchase her lot. I am wondering why it was not returned to her in the first place and everything in between is pure BS by the SC.

when u say repurchase, in this case it is synonymous to returning by repaying an amt. kung wa ka nag wonder sa repurchasing, it should follow u won't wonder w/ the returning. gets?

assuming ma uli, ngano iuli man dretso nga gibayran naman sa gobyerno ang tag-iya? so kinanglan kung kuhaon niya ug balik, it follows nga iuli pud niya ang bayad...

[giddyboy]

but the transfer to Ayala happened during their time.

dha ka nasayop pre. there was no transfer of lots to the Ayalas.

The transfer was from MCIAA to CPVDC and happened during Lito O's term. as of now, a certain percentage of CPVDC shares are even held by public...

karon ipabalhin na pud ang Central Command (Camp LapuLapu) kay paliton na ni Ayala. OK ra ni basta way land grabbing mahitabo. kung na'ay titled private lot nga naa sa tunga sa project basin gamitan na pud ni ug eminent domain technicality. hehe!! ingnon lang nga himuon ug roadway. so ang mahitabo ang lots private and dalan public. malas lang ang mga mabiktima.

please make ur statement factual. di ta mgpataka ug mislead others by putting fiction and malice.

it's not ipabalhin ang Camp LapuLapu sa Mactan coz paliton sa Ayala. it's simply because the Cebu Province owns it in the first place.

"President Arroyo has ordered the transfer of the camp to Mactan Island where its namesake, Lapu-Lapu City is located (the Engineering Brigade will hold fort in Tuburan town). The vacated lot will be reclaimed by its owner, the Provincial Government.

in one of Sun.Star's Bong Wenceslao articles before:

"The change will be drastic. We have seen this in the old Club Filipino de Cebu, now the bustling Ayala business center. We have seen this in the old Lahug airport, now also a bustling business enclave. Efforts by the Cebu City Government to prevent Capitol officials from developing the area notwithstanding, I say change there is inexorable.

But that will only happen if there are no hitches to the transfer. I agree with the idea that until the last troop leaves the area, the process of change won`t be initiated. Still, I do think that, considering the growth of the population in Barangay Lahug and the neighboring Barangay Apas, it is time for the Armed Forces to look for better camp sites.

What I find amusing is the reaction of Cebu City Mayor Tomas Osmena and some members of the City Council to this development. The transfer of the camp benefits more Capitol and therefore Osmena's rival, Gov. Gwendolyn Garcia. Osmena's ranting about protecting the interest of Apas residents thus sounds like it is a product of jealousy."

---------
"If malice or envy were tangible and had a shape, it would be the shape of a boomerang." ~Charley Reese

[realfussion]

by the way na unsa naman diay to issue sa TESDA na lot dapit sa waterfront i lease or ibaligya man daw na sa Capitol nya ang TESDA kay ibalhin ambot asa dapit.. basta before wla pako mo larga mau na ang issue dha.... sa ako na hibaw an wla man gibaligya dha sa it park, everything dha gipa lease ramana sa so basically ang Cebu province gihapon ang owner, joint venture coz ayala ang nag develop but if mahuman na ang contract sa Cebu province ra gihapon na ang properties... though im not that know all technically, basta according na sa among client sa una yang business naa dha sulod sa IT park....

[Jerry Michael]

Kining mga Garcia - classic example ni sa mga TRAPO. Traditional politician. W/c is considered one of the basic problems sa atong katilingban. Mga Bureaucrat Capitalist. They are inherently greedy, corrupt, & have an insatiable appetite for power. Maayo pagka liwat sa pekeng makapili ug makabebe nga presidente.

[giddyboy]

sa ako na hibaw an, wla man gibaligya dha sa it park, everything dha gipa lease ramana sa so basically ang Cebu province gihapon ang owner, joint venture coz Ayala ang nag develop but if mahuman na ang contract sa Cebu province ra gihapon na ang properties... though im not that know all technically, basta according na sa among client sa una yang business naa dha sulod sa IT park....

sakto gyud ka dha dapita.

im just amazed to the nth degree ngano nahimo ning wild gossip nga "land-grabbing" kno ni nga wa man gani ni intawn any mention sa ani nga nabalita, nasibya, or gi bombo. unya ad2 pa gyud ipasangil ni Gwen or mga Garcia...wa cla kuyapi? for all i know, gabitay pa sa golti sa iyang papa c Gwen anang panahona. or c Pablo Sr ga eskwela pa cguro ug high school..hikhikhik

naay niingon nga dili lng cguro hilig ug media mudslinging ang mga involved mao wala kaayo balita aning isyuha. toinks! kadakong binuang oi! kadako anang old Lahug airport ug now IT Park dili ma notice sa media kng tinuod man gani!!!

bsan pa cguro i-assume nato nga gahilom hilom ra ang complainant ug ang pikas, ayaw ko ingna way mo leak sa media...IT'S IMPOSSIBLE! LOLs mo leak paman gani nang balita nga pang palengke ra, kana pa kha nga kaso sa ekta ektarya nga yuta sulod sa syudad...and to think tua sa RTC, CA, ug SC naabot ang kaso!

so u see, thru this misleading infos, naay na nuoy mga tawo na naglagot sa mga Garcia based on this wild rumor about konohay Lahug airport land-grabbing, influence peddling, ug (wow!) money laundering?!?...and to think wala gyud tawon clay labot anang pg transfer sa yuta from Chiongbian, to RP, to MCIAA and then to CPVDC...

prankahay lang ba, i even want to believe gikan ni sa pikas ning pang daut ba, nya napasa sa mga tawo nga taphaw ra ang pag sabot sa isyu...i just dunno, maybe jealousy or envy lng ba kha.

u know na how chismis goes...kung moingon ang source "gibawi na ang yuta sa Capitol", the other one that hears it will say "basin land-grabbing na"...and then another one who heard them both will say "gibawi thru land-grabbing?"...and then people who heard the 3rd guy will then they say, "Gwen is land-grabber diay.". and another will ask, "sayz who?". then another will say "i heard it from my source". and then everybody says, "ah mao ba?"...ang ending, nituo cla nga c Gwen or Capitol land-grabber...to add, moingon pa gyud ug "hawod ang mga Garcia"... TOINKS!!!...LOLs

----------------------

"If malice or envy were tangible and had a shape, it would be the shape of a boomerang." ~Charley Reese
"Jealousy is the great exaggerator." ~Johann Christoph Friedrich von Schiller

[twixsyl]

I think hawod gyud bitaw sila BUT I think Gwen is doing her job man sad. Naa sad gyud ika pang hambog.

And if they're doing something above board, I'm sure the media and the people here in Cebu mo reklamo man gyud na daun.

Maybe LytSlpr has a point sad about connections. But I think that's true for most if not all the politicians. Others are so subtle that people wouldn't notice.