Is Evolutionist Science worth believing?

[Pein]

---

ILAD ILAD NAPOD AY...POST TANAN BRADIX IMONG SOURCE...

Imo manang gimaniobra imong source para makailad ka tsk tsk... bisag kinsay pabasahon anang imong source sa wiki kay klaro kaayo nga si Richard Weikart kay mangingilad pod pareho ninyo.

MGA BRADIX dia ra ang iyang source "kuno" Richard Weikart - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
siya ray naunay sa iyang source nga maoy nikontra sa iyang gipost...pagkabryt gyud hihihihi

Summary ay:

From Darwin to Hitler

Weikart is best known for his 2004 book From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics and Racism in Germany.[8][9] The Discovery Institute, the hub of the intelligent design movement, "provided crucial funding" for the book's research.[10] Prominent historian and critic of the Intelligent design movement, Barbara Forest, states that the book is tied to the DI's 'wedge strategy' of attacking Darwinian science as morally corrupting.[11] This strategy aims to "defeat [the] materialist world view" represented by the theory of evolution in favor of "a science consonant with Christian and theistic convictions."[12]

In 2008, he appeared in Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, a pro-Intelligent design movie, which among other claims, strongly implies that Charles Darwin's ideas led to Adolf Hitler's atrocities.[13] In The Modesto Bee, Bret Carroll, Weikart's colleague in the Stanislaus history department, wrote "That 'intelligent design' is not a scientific theory" and the Expelled movie "misuses Weikart's research by mistakenly implying that Darwin led inevitably to Hitler. In fact, scientific theories, even those like Darwin's that address organic life, are morally neutral."[14] He also appears in Coral Ridge Ministries' 2006 creationist film "Darwin's Deadly Legacy" in which Weikart claims "Darwinian ideology is the core" of Nazism and D. James Kennedy, therefore, concludes "No Darwin, no Hitler." In addition, Creation Ministries International cites Weikart as "reinforcing the Darwin–Hitler connection."[15]

Gipamugos gyud diay ni ni Weikart iyang kinwanggol...tsk tsk...

Academic reception

The academic community has been critical of the book. Andrew Zimmerman, a professor of German history, was critical in his review in the American Historical Review, writing "Weikart presents an image of Darwinism at once both too narrow and too broad."[26] Zimmerman wrote, "The German Darwinians who are the focus of the book appear only as advocates of eugenics, racism, and imperialism, although presumably these policies were informed by a broader intellectual project. At the same time, German anthropologists, who opposed Darwinism before the turn of the century (as a doctrine possessing no more empirical foundation than revealed religion does), are lumped with Darwinists, since these anthropologists also supported imperialism and racist hierarchies."[26] Weikart replied to Zimmerman's criticism to which Zimmerman offered a rebuttal saying Weikart "distorts the history of Darwinism and anti-Darwinism in Germany in ways that reflect theocratic agendas in present-day American politics."[27] Weikart has written some responses to reviews on his webpage.[28]

Basaha ninyo ang link bradix kay diha ninyo makita giunsa pagmaniobra aning pien ang iyang source. hihihihi

kinsa kahay tuuhan nato noh? si Richard Weikart nga usa ka Historian or si botslob nga mangayuhay ra ug kariton...

dia pa oh kan a ning akong mga source:

The Holocaust

One of the foundations of Hitler's social policies was the concept of racial hygiene. It was based on the ideas of Arthur de Gobineau, a French count, eugenics, a pseudo-science that advocated racial purity, and social Darwinism, a mis-use of Charles Darwin's thought. Applied to human beings, "survival of the fittest" was interpreted as requiring racial purity and killing off "life unworthy of life." The first victims were children with physical and developmental disabilities; those
killings occurred in a programme dubbed Action T4.[118] After a public outcry, Hitler made a show of ending this program, but the killings in fact continued (see Nazi eugenics).

Between 1939 and 1945, the SS, assisted by collaborationist governments and recruits from occupied countries, systematically killed somewhere between 11 and 14 million people, including about six million Jews,[119][120] in concentration camps, ghettos and mass executions, or through less systematic methods elsewhere. In addition to those gassed to death, many also died as a result of starvation and disease while working as slave labourers (sometimes benefiting private German companies). Along with Jews, non-Jewish Poles (over three million), communists or political opponents, members of resistance groups, homosexuals, Roma, the physically handicapped and mentally retarded, Soviet prisoners of war (possibly as many as three million), Jehovah's Witnesses, Adventists and Neopagans, trade unionists, and psychiatric patients were killed. One of the biggest centres of mass-killing was the extermination camp complex of Auschwitz-Birkenau. Hitler never visited the concentration camps and did not speak publicly about the killing in precise terms.

The Holocaust (the Endlösung der jüdischen Frage or "Final Solution of the Jewish Question") was planned and ordered by leading Nazis, with Heinrich Himmler playing a key role. While no specific order from Hitler authorizing the mass killing has surfaced, there is documentation showing that he approved the Einsatzgruppen, killing squads that followed the German army through Poland and Russia, and that he was kept well informed about their activities. The evidence also suggests that in the fall of 1941 Himmler and Hitler decided upon mass extermination by gassing. During interrogations by Soviet intelligence officers declassified over fifty years later, Hitler's valet Heinz Linge and his military aide Otto Gunsche said Hitler had "pored over the first blueprints of gas chambers." Also his private secretary, Traudl Junge, testified that Hitler knew all about the death camps.

To make for smoother cooperation in the implementation of this "Final Solution", the Wannsee conference was held near Berlin on 20 January 1942, with fifteen senior officials participating, led by Reinhard Heydrich and Adolf Eichmann. The records of this meeting provide the clearest evidence of planning for the Holocaust. On 22 February, Hitler was recorded saying to his associates, "we shall regain our health only by eliminating the Jews".

Adolf Hitler - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

hmmmmmm.....

[botslob]

naabot nag hitler hihihihi nagpasagad nalang og butang og source nagpasagad nalang og basa...tsk tsk...desperado naman kaayo ni siya oy...hihihihi: sunod aning pien kay si satanas og si brad eli kay moy nag imbento sa evolution hihihihi

[Pein]

naabot nag hitler hihihihi nagpasagad nalang og butang og source nagpasagad nalang og basa...tsk tsk...desperado naman kaayo ni siya oy...hihihihi: sunod aning pien kay si satanas og si brad eli kay moy nag imbento sa evolution hihihihi

natural mukunsulta jud ta ni Hitler para makahibaw ta kung dis a niya kuhaa ang idea sa Holocaust...

awa ha:

One of the foundations of Hitler's social policies was the concept of racial hygiene. It was based on the ideas of Arthur de Gobineau, a French count, eugenics, a pseudo-science that advocated racial purity, and social Darwinism, a mis-use of Charles Darwin's thought. Applied to human beings, "survival of the fittest" was interpreted as requiring racial purity and killing off "life unworthy of life." The first victims were children with physical and developmental disabilities; those
killings occurred in a programme dubbed Action T4. After a public outcry, Hitler made a show of ending this program, but the killings in fact continued.

Adolf Hitler - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

arang nindutag na contribute sa Darwinism sa Holocaust oi....

hmmmmm...

[botslob]

natural mukunsulta jud ta ni Hitler para makahibaw ta kung dis a niya kuhaa ang idea sa Holocaust...

awa ha:

One of the foundations of Hitler's social policies was the concept of racial hygiene. It was based on the ideas of Arthur de Gobineau, a French count, eugenics, a pseudo-science that advocated racial purity, and social Darwinism, a mis-use of Charles Darwin's thought. Applied to human beings, "survival of the fittest" was interpreted as requiring racial purity and killing off "life unworthy of life." The first victims were children with physical and developmental disabilities; those
killings occurred in a programme dubbed Action T4. After a public outcry, Hitler made a show of ending this program, but the killings in fact continued.

Adolf Hitler - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

arang nindutag na contribute sa Darwinism sa Holocaust oi....

hmmmmm...

ka rich sab nimog imagination bradix...layo ra kaayo na sa tina-i...hihihihi huna huna ra na sa mga oplok tsk tsk basin nagtoo pod ka nga ang ginoo kay evolutionist kay daghan ra ba gipang ihaw tungod sa kristiyanismo kay survival of the fittest man kaha noh? hihihihihi

wa gyud diay ka kasabot sa evolution bradix, tsk tsk hihihihi

Para nimo bradix: "A prudent man concealeth knowledge: but the heart of fools proclaimeth foolishness." ~Proverbs 12:23

so dont proclaim your foolishness here hihihihi kay kita kaayo hihihihi

[botslob]

@ bradix pien xenxa na ...logoff sa ko padayon sa imong pangilad diha kay basahon ra nako ugma. malingaw ko sa imong style sa pag pangilad. ayaw kabalaka kay ang ginoo ray mahibaw kanimo para mausab ka. giampo na tika, ok? hihihihi

adios bradix...

[Pein]

ka rich sab nimog imagination bradix...layo ra kaayo na sa tina-i...hihihihi huna huna ra na sa mga oplok tsk tsk basin nagtoo pod ka nga ang ginoo kay evolutionist kay daghan ra ba gipang ihaw tungod sa kristiyanismo kay survival of the fittest man kaha noh? hihihihihi

wa gyud diay ka kasabot sa evolution bradix, tsk tsk hihihihi

Para nimo bradix: "A prudent man concealeth knowledge: but the heart of fools proclaimeth foolishness." ~Proverbs 12:23

so dont proclaim your foolishness here hihihihi kay kita kaayo hihihihi

anhi nalang ko sa christian doctrine nga "love your enemies" kesa ninyong mga maayong laki daw pero awa ang resulta...pila kaha ang patay sa Holocaust noh?

kung walay Darwinian Theory IMO walay Holocaust...

kanang imong evolution awa daghan kaayog gipang ihaw...kung hangtod karon naa pa ang Holocaust basin gihimo nakag pulutan kay useless raba ka tig ayo rag kariton...

Theory of Evolution - "Survival of the fittest".

unsay resulta? Holocaust...

[tripwire]

@ pein

sir, don't believe what wikipedia's write ups. You're telling us that wikipedia is as good as the bible. wikipedia can be edited by anyone who is a member there. If wikipedia is your source as truth, you're only making a bigger mistake. Even wikipedia has full of erroneous entry.

[Pein]

@ pein

sir, don't believe what wikipedia's write ups. You're telling us that wikipedia is as good as the bible. wikipedia can be edited by anyone who is a member there. If wikipedia is your source as truth, you're only making a bigger mistake. Even wikipedia has full of erroneous entry.

IMO noh, dili man pud siguro magpasagad ug post ug article ang Wikipedia kung wala silay igong basihan...naa jud siguroy maipakitang reference na sila oi...maong wikipedia akong gigamit kay mao may usa sa pinakadaling access diri sa internet para mukuha ug mga sources...

para sa ako noh bisan pag unsa nang imong source basta tinuod lang dawaton man nako...bisan pag bata ang nagsulti nako basta tinuod lang iyang gistorya ngano gud intawn dili man nato dawaton...remember, ang husgado mudawat ug xerox copy basta tinuod lang...

ikaw dili diay ka mudawat ug xerox copy? original jud imong gusto? lupig pa diay ang husgado nimo kung mauhon na...

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

[NASYO]

ikaw dili diay ka mudawat ug xerox copy? original jud imong gusto? lupig pa diay ang husgado nimo kung mauhon na...

original jud amo gusto..

photocopy with authentication tali imo gipasabot bro..

[tokidoki_v2.0]

@ pein

sir, don't believe what wikipedia's write ups. You're telling us that wikipedia is as good as the bible. wikipedia can be edited by anyone who is a member there. If wikipedia is your source as truth, you're only making a bigger mistake. Even wikipedia has full of erroneous entry.

That's why i only read some paragraphs then I go to external sources sa last part.

@pein: ok ra na pre. di man kaha lisud kuhaon ang orig? Arang2x nalang nang xerox kai sa anang uban diha naghunahuna na ang maghula kinsay criminal admissible in court. LOL