BangsaMoro struggle n grievances!

[tingkoy13]

---

sakto jud na inyong gpang sulti bai, own interest rasad cguro ni rason nganu gusto sila ana, once ilaha na sila man naai power d ilaha ang tanan grasya sa lugar...

[cebuboi]

aw kon asa ang mga extreme nga pangutok nga muslim tua ang gubot! and that's anywhere in the world..

[springbok]

morag naka dungog ko nga gi deny na ang moa sa supreme court ( duno if my ears heard correctly) .......... suko najud ni ang MILF ani...... mag gira najud ni!

[potterboy]

went to the solgen's office for a private matter. busy kaayo sya ani. and yes, denied na ang moa.

unta kung malupig na ang milf ug wala nay hasol sa mindanao, magtinbangay nata, christians, muslims ug lumads. pinoy ra baya ta tanan.

[ronaYo]

Quote from Inquirer: Gov’t junks MOA in all forms 08/30/08

"Supreme Court Justice Adolf Azcuna said that in international law, a declaration of consensus points would be binding on the government. Even a unilateral statement by representatives of a state before an international forum is a binding obligation, and the state could not renege on its obligation by claiming that the agreement was unconstitutional, he said.
“From a legal standpoint, you have the MOA initialed by the panel and if you withdraw the TRO, that initial means that under international law, they are compelled to sign it,” he said.
He explained that if the MOA had been signed, the state would have been required to change the country’s internal laws in order to comply with it.
Malaysia, as the broker of the peace agreement, could even sue the Philippines before the international courts to compel it to implement the MOA, he added.
Azcuna said that the Supreme Court had to stop the signing of the MOA on the eve of the scheduled signing in Kuala Lumpur last Aug. 5 “because if it had been signed, it would have been a binding international obligation. Malaysia can compel us to change our Constitution.”

Ti-aw mo nah? kung napirmahan tu ug na-lift ang TRO, binding ang agreement according sa International Law! Malaysia can compel us to change our Constitution para lang jud ma-accomodate ang agreement!

[ike74ph]

Is partition, like the India-Pakistan an acceptable solution?

[ieuseerm]

mao ni map sa moa-ad, nga e-puno sa armm. tan-awa ra gud tawn pila ka kadaghang kinabuhi, ma-muslim man or ma-kristiano, ang maapektuhan.

[ieuseerm]

"The map presents a grotesque territorial truncation of the Republic. It adds to the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) territory twice the size of the original area. The MOA seeks to enlarge the area to include the ARMM (Sulu, Maguindanao, Lanao del Sur, Tawi-Tawi, Basilan and Marawi City); six municipalities in Lanao del Norte, hundreds of villages in the provinces of Sultan Kudarat, Lanao del Norte and North Cotabato, which voted to become part of the ARMM in 2001. It also proposes to include in the Bangsamoro “ancestral domain” two municipalities of Palawan, Zamboanga del Norte and Zamboanga Sibugay..."
"The map of the expanded Bangsamoro “ancestral domain” forms a crazy-quilt pattern of territorial distribution far worse than the gerrymandering of congressional districts..."
"The territorial formation lays the ground for partition of the Philippines, a sort of political experiment in a negotiated establishment of a separate state. Its concepts have no precedents in the history of partitions of nations. They are different in the sense that the more celebrated partitions in history were mediated by the interventions of external powers, as in the partition of Poland or of British India into India and Pakistan..."
"...the partition sought by the MOA was not brought about by the armed intervention of foreign powers, although the negotiations over the Bangsamoro homeland were brokered by Malaysia, which acted as host for the peace talks..."
Mindanao Peace Process

[donix]

gubat nata tanan!

[pnoize]

gubat nata tanan!

it is so easy to say this but once real bullets start passing by your head, i wonder if you'll still say this.