you seems to be very defensive in our discussion. anyway, i have encountered much worst.
i was just inquiring more as a whole but you want it to be more argumentative. anyway, you are still evading my questions about Quran alone believers. remember, i was only trying to ask your views on the questions i made.
using the words 'pataka' or 'kuwang nabaw an' is kind of unwarranted. it just shows the attitude you have to people who ask questions to your faith. much more kung magcritize pa jud.
you haven't answered my questions the direct errancy and correct teachings of the torah and even the New Testament kay mau man imong ingon nga dili mau ang teaching, dba?
as i have said, bible scholars are not primarily believers of the book. scholars who believes the book outnumbers those who do not though those scholars are theologians themselves.
anyway, let's focus on my questions na lng.
kani:
- what part of the torah and gospel is corrrect? since you say naa jud tinuod.
- how about the book of psalms? from your own opinion, is the book today uncorrupted like most muslim believe it or not? either answer, what's the answer/evidence behind it? if it's corrupted, why other muslims say it is not?
- what is the drawback for quranic believer who dont believe in the hadith? will they go to hell for that?
thanks.
