ABS-CBN's "Iisa Pa Lamang" Thread

[ninzska21]

@kinsakahani

its nice to hear na detailed ky ka sa Iisa pa lamang dah. hehehe
keep watching and maybe just maybe it wont fail ur exception again....

well.. its ur opinion bro... thnx..
i really like the show cuz its getting interesting nah..

i saw the preview.. k2 niuli siya sa iya mama.. gi ingnan cya na karma nana..

[abante intsik]

WALA BA NI'Y LEGAL CONSULTANTS ANG ABS-CBN?!!!!!

I saw today’s (August 12, 200 episode of the teleserye, “Iisa pa Lamang” and here is what I have to say.

The Fact that such video (disinheriting Catherine) exists (even if assuming that it is not fake) is of no moment. Article 916 of the New Civil Code provides: “Disinheritance can only be effected through a will wherein the legal cause therefor shall be specified,” while Article 804 of the same, provides that, “Every will MUST BE IN WRITING and executed in a language or dialect known to the testator.”

In other words, in order that the disinheritance be valid, such must be in writing. In the instant case, the disinheritance was merely contained in a video clip (again even assuming that it is not fake), therefore it did not comply with the legal requirements provided for under the New Civil Code, and as such, is of no effect.

ALSO, assuming, for the sake of argument, that the disinheritance is valid, still Catherine cannot be disinherited of his conjugal share. Pursuant to the Family Code, from the moment Martin and Catherine got married, Catherine already owned half (with a few personal properties exempted thereform) of Martin’s properties. This is so since, the parties did not execute a pre-nuptial agreement, in fact in one of the episodes, Martin even confirmed this (that they already owned the properties 50-50). If indeed, Catherine was disinherited, such disinheritance would only involve the conjugal share of Martin. Meaning, Catherine still owned half of the subject properties.

What makes this teleserye even more disappointing, is the fact that Catherine’s friend/lover, Rafael Torralba (Gabby Concepcion) was supposed to be a lawyer. However, he was not able to give Catherine the proper advise. We’ll what do you expect?! Even Rafael (who was supposed to be a lawyer) does not know the law. In the same episode, Rafael threatened to file a case of “Serious Physical Injuries” against those who assaulted Catherine. Being a Lawyer, does he not know the legal requisites in order for a person to be held liable for Serious Physical Injuries?! Di na ko ganahan mag elaborate, kapoy na!

With these blunders (and many more), I could only think of 3 scenarios, and these are the following:
(1) ABS-CBN has no legal consultants;
(2) ABS-CBN has legal consultants but are !n(0mp*+*n+; or
(3) ABS-CBN thinks that its viewers are stupid

I have noticed a number of flaws with Philippine’ Teleseryes but it was only now that I got fed up.

haler....la pa gani to nahuman...la ka kita gabi.e nohla na dai ka naminaw kai atty. gabby concepcion gabie.

[kinsakahani]

haler....la pa gani to nahuman...la ka kita gabi.e nohla na dai ka naminaw kai atty. gabby concepcion gabie.

Could you pls care to elaborate? coz, I think i'm not the one who is "la kita" and "la naminaw"

[kinsakahani]

@kinsakahani
well.. its ur opinion bro... thnx..

its not an opinion, its a legal fact. you can ask any lawyer you know.

[xxkatgorgeousxx]

di man na reality ang iisa pa lamang oi..seryosohon man nimu ug maayo bro..

besides, nisulti sa gabby last nyt na dili pwede magamit ang video sa court of law..nuf said..no need to elaborate about family codes ek ek ek..mas samut di kasabot ang mga tao kung himuon nila ug complex ang mga terms ug lines nila..di bya tanan mutan-aw ug IPL law students ug brayt!

[ninzska21]

its not an opinion, its a legal fact. you can ask any lawyer you know.

sorry..
i dont need to waste my time.

u should wait for the coming days bro... maybe it will come up...

still.. nice and genuine acting..

[kinsakahani]

besides, nisulti sa gabby last nyt na dili pwede magamit ang video sa court of law..nuf said..

As a lawyer, was that the best that he can do?! Tsk...tsk...

di bya tanan mutan-aw ug IPL law students ug brayt!

Mao gani, wat they are doing is misinforming the people. What makes thing worse is that majority of the viewers come from the so called "masa" - mao ni na mga tao na dali kaayo mo tu-o. kaya when the same situation comes their way they would be doing same things because they were misinformed. (i'm not simply talking here of Iisa pa Lamang but all teleseryes) Consequently, mas labing kalolooy.

[xxkatgorgeousxx]

@kinsakahani

haha..ayaw ko pangutan-aw ana bro kai di bya ko lawyer! hehehe!

and you said ABS ra imu tan-awon..so wa pa ka kita sa GMA shows..tan-aw pud..para kita pud ka ug lousy..mas maganahan ka ug tan-aw ig IPL bisan pa ingnon nimu na "SAYOP" ug ila gi-misinform ang public..

[ninzska21]

mao.. in the overall nice jud ang IPL.. naay flaw.. pero the acting and the plot is superb..

[kinsakahani]

@kinsakahani

haha..ayaw ko pangutan-aw ana bro kai di bya ko lawyer! hehehe!

and you said ABS ra imu tan-awon..so wa pa ka kita sa GMA shows..tan-aw pud..para kita pud ka ug lousy..mas maganahan ka ug tan-aw ig IPL bisan pa ingnon nimu na "SAYOP" ug ila gi-misinform ang public..

Di gyud ko ganahan ug GMA-7 shows! KAPAMILYA ni! pero how I wish na next time, mas well researched na ilang (ABS-CBN) shows.