Does the translation of the Bible to our language reflects it's original meaning?

[tripwire]

simply ra mga bro ang sis.

to believe or not to believe the Holly Scriptures of Jesus Christ.
mo too ta ug Ginoo or dli?

mao ra mana ang choices sa tawo ba.
dli pud pwede nga mo pili lng ta ug mga verses sa Bible ky murag dha lng mo fit ang ato lifestyle, the WHOLE scriptures jud.

ky satan ka or ky God?

If I may... what if some of those that don't believe in God - like the atheists, buddhists, are they considered pawns of satan? I agree about the choices... but bringing them out to place that they are not accepted in a society of religion or any civilized society for that matter is somewhat irrational. No pun intended, btw.

All is well.

[NASYO]

I take to lean on the message relay technique and probabilities to err.

[Hellblazer 2.1]

kapila man ni nila, gi-translate?
Pila na ka baba ug dalunggan ang na-agian ani?

Possible ba nga sayop ang bibliya?

yes. Yes. Yes.

[NASYO]

bulahan ang mitu-o nga wala makakita

[r3roble]

bulahan ang mitu-o nga wala makakita

true bro Nasyo...
daghan man dri ang nag-ingon nga sakto pagkatranslate to our language ang Bible so i guess we better conclude this?

[arubinkun]

here's what I learned about how the Bible we have today came to be...

the original scrolls were written with the utmost precision to the point that if they miswrite a tail of a letter, they would throw the whole book and rewrite it again from page one...

on the new testament, the scribes that were assigned to write were chosen because of their background as former scribes...

on the compilation... this is what I got from Wiki

https://www.istorya.net/forums/spirit...meaning-3.html

As Hebrew and Greek, the original languages of the Bible, have idioms and concepts not easily translated, there is an on going critical tension about whether it is better to give a word for word translation or to give a translation that gives a parallel idiom in the target language. For instance, in the English language Catholic translation, the New American Bible, as well as the Protestant translations of the Christian Bible, translations like the King James Version, the New Revised Standard Version, and the New American Standard Bible are seen as fairly literal translations (or "word for word"), whereas translations like the New International Version and New Living Translation attempt to give relevant parallel idioms. The Living Bible and The Message are two paraphrases of the Bible that try to convey the original meaning in contemporary language. The further away one gets from word to word translation, the text becomes easier to read while relying more on the theological, linguistic or cultural understanding of the translator, which one would not normally expect a lay reader to require.

There are some translations that are can be trusted since it was done word for word and according to relevant parallel idioms on contemporary language.....

[NASYO]

pasabot, probabilty to err with respect sa accuracy kay grabe ka dako..

[r3roble]

mga bro, what about kaha ang translation to tagalog and bisaya?

[mordecai_327]

pasabot, probabilty to err with respect sa accuracy kay grabe ka dako..

...you have figures bro?

With more than 5,000 extant manuscripts available for us today, textual criticism helps do the work.

[Unmei]

tanan nga naa written sa bible pasumbingay... somewhat related sa mga panghitabo karon... pero i think ive read something that the bible that we have now.. is kulang daw.. there are pages that are not binded on the reprints done today