Moon Landing, Real or Hoax?

[rodsky]

---

well sa flag-waving issue mao mani gisulti sa link (site) nga imo gi-post

Clavius: Photo Analysis - jump salute

excerpt from the link i just posted above:

The flag shouldn't be waving without an atmosphere.

The wrinkles and folds in the flag are from its tight packing during the voyage, not because the air is blowing it. Fig. 2 is the flag from the picture Young took of Charlie Duke's salute a few seconds later. You can see that it's almost identical to the one in the photo above, but photographed from a slightly different angle.

If the flag were waving in the breeze we'd expect it to billow differently in photographs taken seconds or minutes apart. Instead the folds don't change between photographs. The flag is obviously stationary, but wrinkled.



same site... asa man jud tinuod ani

I don't seem to follow your logic miss? Where oh where is the point of contradiction? You post doesn't offer a contradiction--it actually supports what I previously pointed out.

One of the lessons I got from issues like this (especially when I was giving lectures before about this topic)--over half of the problems in understanding simply lie in the inability of some people to understand things explained in English.

-RODION

[joan624]

I don't seem to follow your logic miss? Where oh where is the point of contradiction? You post doesn't offer a contradiction--it actually supports what I previously pointed out.

oh yeah right
wa bitaw nicontradict ako first reply ani nga topic
if u'll read it ako gi-state dd2 nga:
well, kad2 reason na pag-pack sa flag mao na-kum-ot and ni-appear like waves kay possible

and on my second reply,
i was actually focused on the second claim wherein "inertia" was used as the logical reason for the flag waving.
pero sa video man d.i 2.. my bad
didn't read your whole reply mn gd..
i get bored with long posts..


and it seems that you are overly proud of your english proficiency..
well that's good..
but have you also considered that maybe your students (during your lectures) were also bored out of their wits when you gave them a lecture (perhaps a long one like your post above) regarding this topic?
basin mao naay problems in understanding as you stated..??

dili man gud tanan interesado maminaw ug long talks
no matter how interested you are in the topic
much more if the lecturer is dead serious and bossy

and let me quote you on that:

One of the lessons I got from issues like this (especially when I was giving lectures before about this topic)--over half of the problems in understanding simply lie in the inability of some people to understand things explained in English.

-RODION

[cesski]

hmmm. i'm not so sure. i saw the documentary on this one.

[rodsky]

hmmm. i'm not so sure. i saw the documentary on this one.

If you are referring to a "Conspiracy Theory" episode called "Did we Land on the Moon?"

Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon? (2001) (TV)

Look at the reviews on this episode in IMDB, made by people who are sensible enough to know better.

BTW to supplement the excellent Clavius.org website, here's the Wikipedia entry on:

Apollo Moon Landing hoax conspiracy theories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

-RODION