Is Evolutionist Science worth believing?

[Tattva]

---

not at all. ang larvae I am reffering to are the maggots which all flies will have to undergo such stage before they all become adult flies.

so kung walay naay evidence sir, woould it be a sound judgment to interpolate and draw a conclusion based on unproven theory?

Ok. So beyond it what else is there? i mean what evidence are still there beyond "the larvae"?

whatever it is, beyond it wala nay evidence. So dili puede mo formulate ang science on something nga dili nila ma observe.


Unproven theory? like life came from chemicals and energies? Actually sir naa silay sound theory.

[Hellblazer]

let's call it a draw na lang. ('c',)

[NASYO]

evolution is an incomplete word..

put "R" before EVOLUTION..

That's the right word..

[Hellblazer]

viva la revolution na na bro. ('c',)

[NASYO]

yup.. REVOLUTION..

[Hellblazer]

rebellion ang nindot. ('c',)

[NASYO]

mura'g lagpas na ang rebellion bro..

REVOLUTION within ourselves lang una..

Sugdan nato sa ato kaugalingon..

first move, try listening to "IMAGINE"

[Hellblazer]

are you the incarnation of john lennon or something? ('c',)

[Tattva]

see sir. the argument are always based on the possibility of a complete genetic mutation given the billion of years. which requires a lot of Faith there. it is not evidence, but rather a suggestion of a possibility, and that is not acceptable at all.

if you talk about mutating genes of organism, don't you think they could have done that in the lab already. a different specie is not a different kind. it is still the same kind with some few changes --- a bigger built, a smaller eyes, a larger wing, a stronger horn, etc, etc. but it is still of the sam ekind. a dog is still a dog, a cat is still a cat. and these mutations have limitations.

we have not seen a single cell amoeba becoming a multi-cellular organism, never, you know why sir, because experiments in the lab showed destruction of the mutated specie. that is what i am talking about.

a specie will give rise to another specie of the same kind. still a bird, still a dog, still a fish.

not that a specie will give rise to another specie of an entirely different kind (macroevolution) --- not possible, never shown, no evidence.

A billion of years is not an assumption sir. Gradual changes have been observed and small changes can be big.

This is science explaning the past no need for lab. This is science explaning the FACT in order to form a theory.


Sir im sorry but i have never heard any experimentations conducted to prove this claim you made---->"we have not seen a single cell amoeba becoming a multi-cellular organism, never, you know why sir, because experiments in the lab showed destruction of the mutated specie. that is what i am talking about."

so sir if you have any link or documents pls cite it...i want to be sure then i'll answer you.


Sir there is a question on my previous post about the fly? can you pls answer it.

[NASYO]

nope, i'm just a listener..

and I know that John Lennon is not the only one who needs world peace..

How bout you HELLBLAZER?