
Originally Posted by
Tattva
Not all is repeatable. hehe

I never said that you must trust me? tsk tsk. Thats how you interpret my argument? wow it is a pure misrepresentation, i can call it a lie,false witnessing. What i said is "Who knows that after 500yrs from now science can find the complete explanation". Just like the way they discovered microevolution. Just like the way they discovered that the earth is not the center of the universe, refuting the LIES and DOUBTS of some religious people. You know these religious people said that there is no evidence for evolution and some years before that they used to say that the earth is the center of the universe, tsk tsk. Science proved them wrong.
Diverting strategy? how?
ooops...In this life there are misrepresentations and true presentations. It so happened my friend that your brand of evolution is on the" MIS-representation" side.
FYI i have already read what evolution is and in fact i have gone to a creationist site as well. Anyways thank you for your advise. But one thing is for sure...chemical evolution and organic evolution is not at all EVOLUTION.
And no they are not dropping what they cant prove but obviously they are dropping what evolution is not. Just trying to give a clear picture negating the misrepresentations made by the other groups.
yah who knows is not science, so if it is not science what it is then? faith and if it is faith the basis of which is what? trusting you and your maybe after 500 years...... so in the final analysis............ who is a false witness and a big lie then? of course |YOU, the one that manipulate words and suggest a possibility after 500 years!
i have faith and I admit it. you? meditation and science? and you say proof? all you are assumptions and hope that what we see in microevolution within the context of minimal genetic changes you suggested a large scale change and assume the possibilitities of it with the known scientific facts!
in medicine --- a drug that is tested in a small scale popultion and found to be beificail is not an assurance that it is benificial in the field it claims. a large scale study will prove it! because there are a lot of small scale population studey that differ in the large scale population. that is why assumption is a dangerous thing!
so who's lying now? making assumptions? withput the facts? see now? so cosmic and chemical elements where created by GOD and only living form evolved? hahaha, what a lame evolutionist you are. tell me you don't have any explanation how the cosmic bodies where formed? how the elements of the periodic table was formed? and the laws that govern the universe where did it came from. if not evolution then where?
|GOD created them. hahaha. a confused evolutionist!
ow please! spare me the hypocracy! you giving a clear picture? of what? you are not even decided if you are an evolutionist or just a half-half. half evolutionist-- half what? meditation?
make up your mind!