Is Evolutionist Science worth believing?

[Alel]

---

mao ba, so kung maka prove ko ug magic motoo ka nga naay Ginoo nga nag create aning kalibotana? saman?

magic man kaha meaning kanang mga paranormal.

^_^...Maka-katawa man ko oie...hehe...Jologz, are you here?...^_^

Anyways, I dont believe in the magic that you mentioned- that is as in paranormal.

Why?

First of all, because I dont see any reason or any proof that proves it's existence.

Secondly, I know magic. And in knowing it, I know it is non-existent.

I do believe in magic - but a different one as cosmos is concerned.

But in magic as in the paranormal? Nopes...


And to the topic:

The Darwin Theory of Evolution is for me is worth believing. It is too scientific to be not believable. It is worth believing.

And to about theories:

Even though theories are not absolutely proven, you cant debunk it as false. And the more you cant endorse the opposite as true!

Think a bit more logical.

Peace.


Alel

[SPIKE_CSA]

^_^...Maka-katawa man ko oie...hehe...Jologz, are you here?...^_^

Anyways, I dont believe in the magic that you mentioned- that is as in paranormal.

Why?

First of all, because I dont see any reason or any proof that proves it's existence.

Secondly, I know magic. And in knowing it, I know it is non-existent.

I do believe in magic - but a different one as cosmos is concerned.

But in magic as in the paranormal? Nopes...


And to the topic:

The Darwin Theory of Evolution is for me is worth believing. It is too scientific to be not believable. It is worth believing.

And to about theories:

Even though theories are not absolutely proven, you cant debunk it as false. And the more you cant endorse the opposite as true!

Think a bit more logical.

Peace.


Alel

hahaha scientific ang darwinian evolution? hehehe funny...

I dont believe in darwinian evolution for the very reason that a SINGLE-CELLED organism did not possess all genetic information for a human, so in order for humans to have ultimately evolved from a primitive single-celled organism a lot of genetic information had to added along the way.

ug until karon wala pa gyud known way for entirely new genetic information to be added to a genome.

and that is scientific and no one can deny that maski kinsa nga scientist.. maski si Charles darwin pa hahahaha

gilaliman lng mo ug gikan ta sa usa ka INORGANIC MATTER nya nahimong SINGLE CELLED ORGANISM then nahimong FISH to AMPHIBIAN, to REPTILE to MAMMAL?

e provide kuno na ninyo diri mga evolutionists beh nga ang single celled organism contains ALL THE GENETIC INFORMATION FOR A HUMAN.. hehehe

[Lord_Ac]

A simple minded guy wouldn't definitely understand.. No matter how much one explains it. I find it stupid, foolish, and ignorant to look at the bible as scientific.

[Alel]

hahaha scientific ang darwinian evolution? hehehe funny...

I dont believe in darwinian evolution for the very reason that a SINGLE-CELLED organism did not possess all genetic information for a human, so in order for humans to have ultimately evolved from a primitive single-celled organism a lot of genetic information had to added along the way.

ug until karon wala pa gyud known way for entirely new genetic information to be added to a genome.

and that is scientific and no one can deny that maski kinsa nga scientist.. maski si Charles darwin pa hahahaha

gilaliman lng mo ug gikan ta sa usa ka INORGANIC MATTER nya nahimong SINGLE CELLED ORGANISM then nahimong FISH to AMPHIBIAN, to REPTILE to MAMMAL?

e provide kuno na ninyo diri mga evolutionists beh nga ang single celled organism contains ALL THE GENETIC INFORMATION FOR A HUMAN.. hehehe

So I assume that you propose nga all living organisms appeared at once?...I think it would sound more magical then. Weird.

How do babies form? Doesnt it come from single-celled organisms? In fact it does.

Ever heard of the sperm cell? How about the egg cell?

Does the word fertilization sound something new? How about fetus?


Living, single-cell organisms have the ability to grow. To multiply. To interact with others. They convert energy into matter - they convert energy into their own replica. (Refer to Einstein's Law of Conservation of Mass and Energy. Then research on Metabolism. )

And, there are only 2 types of cells. Animal cells & plant cells. Animal cells never compose a plant. Nor plant cells compose an animal.

And mind you, inorganic matter are not made of cells. They are made of atoms. Not cells.

And first of all, the Darwin Theory did not mention that the living organism once was a non-living one.

And genetic information was never added explicitly to a genome. They evolve with them. The thing is that we humans cant recreate that. Only nature can. Through the transpiring ecology of the organisms' environment.
It is better to first study what is the objective of organic evolution is to understand what this whole thing means.


Alel

[Sinyalan]

@ yikes! este spikes

You are really showing your ignorance pre. Darwin's theory of evolution is not scientific... evolution is not scientific... and still you believe that we came from apes.... I don't why pre if you read all the topics here. Rodsky pointed good views and yet here you're still showing ignorance. Soriano now is acientist! It's full circle now... circle of old beliefs. hence, and dating daan na name.

[Oakboy]

dako gyud ug possibility hilabi na ug mag cross breed ang insik ug ang negro ug ma expose pud siya sa heat...
although dako pud ug factor ang genes sa tao pero through the years dako jud ug possiblity nga ang mga descendants anang insika ma negro pud..
and that takes a long long period of time..

ato sang klarohon haron dili ta mo layo a pangutana ha "Is Evolutionist Science worth believing? yes or no? and why?
toink "Cross Breed?" evolution tingali atong gi hisgutan dire..laktod pagka sulti ang mga descendants ni noah kai gikan sa pagka "ungoy"?
naa ni sa bible hatagi kuno ko og verse? I hope rcruman makatabang pud hatag og verse ini..
ang imong gi sulti nga ang insik mahimong negro through time kon e butang sa africa..that example simply shows the Evolution theory, karon mo ingon ka
dili ka motuo og evolution..ano ba talaga kuya, adam and eve? israelites mohimong igorot?



Re: Is Evolutionist Science worth believing?

[Alel]

ato sang klarohon haron dili ta mo layo a pangutana ha "Is Evolutionist Science worth believing? yes or no? and why?
toink "Cross Breed?" evolution tingali atong gi hisgutan dire..laktod pagka sulti ang mga descendants ni noah kai gikan sa pagka "ungoy"?
naa ni sa bible hatagi kuno ko og verse? I hope rcruman makatabang pud hatag og verse ini..

Do we HAVE TO quote the Bible to prove a point??

When it comes to the Evolution Theory, there are lots of other books and resources that are more credible than the Bible!

Bible is not the ultimate book!

Alel

[Oakboy]

Do we HAVE TO quote the Bible to prove a point??

When it comes to the Evolution Theory, there are lots of other books and resources that are more credible than the Bible!

Bible is not the ultimate book!

Alel

not only books naa daghan dire sa net..mao gyud..
ako ranang gi sumbalik nga pangutana "hatagi kuno ko og verse sa bible" kai mao nay sagad gamiton nga question sa ADD dre..
hehehehe!

[Alel]

not only books naa daghan dire sa net..mao gyud..
ako ranang gi sumbalik nga pangutana "hatagi kuno ko og verse sa bible" kai mao nay sagad gamiton nga question sa ADD dre..
hehehehe!

Ay, Sorry...I'm barking up the wrong tree...hehehehe

Anyways,

Nonesense na kaayo usahay sa nga perme Bible lang ang basehan. Murag ang Bible ra kunohay ang tubag sa tanan. Murag ang Bible rajud ang angay tuuhan. Dili nalang ta mutuo sa Dictionary ani kung mao ni kalakiha...Wierd..

Alel

[Oakboy]

mao gyudna, there are other books like "al-Qur'an, bhagavad gita etc..."