Is Evolutionist Science worth believing?

[kalanrakas]

---

to those who believe that gravity is still a theory, don't you think the crown regency building near fuente osmeña is quite tempting to prove the "theory"? hala, layat!

[boomer]

gravity is also a theory...

Gravity WAS also a theory, But its been proven already by science..

Remember Newtons Law? the Law of Gravity? - Its no longer a theory

my bad, its already a LAW.

Isaac Newton's Newtonian law of gravitation is a famous example of an established law that was later found not to be universal—it does not hold in experiments involving motion at speeds close to the speed of light or in close proximity of strong gravitational fields. Outside these conditions, Newton's Laws remain an excellent model of motion and gravity. Since general relativity accounts for all the same phenomena that Newton's Laws do and more, general relativity is now regarded as a more comprehensive theory.

Its good if it was a honest mistake but conspiring to make it look like real science adding bones from animals, manipulating evidence or should i say tampering, tsk tsk. Thats not REAL SCIENCE thats evil science.


you know i can post the hoaxes committed by your evolutionist priests right here.

I think you are following the wrong people.

very misleading napod, evolution priests!? its not even a religion.

unfortunately these self correcting measures is non evident in "religion/religious" affairs....taking outdated text claiming that any inconsistencies with observed evidence are just "tests of faith." Or claim "irreducible complexity," which is just another way of saying "I'm too stupid/lazy to try and understand it so I'm just gonna say 'God did it.'"

[brown_dog]

That is why science is good. It is self correcting. It sifts out the "bad data" from the good. Science acknowledges it's mistakes and points out some fossils were indeed faked. But that's the beauty of it--unless you are self-correcting, you will never improve.

-RODION

And to think of it you have to assume that there is a possibility that what you believe is a Hoax. Since Evolutionist Science is Self correcting and changing everytime. And for one thing No evolutionist scientist has been able to created a single sinthetic living leaf. From the history of mankind. So they are about I don't know how much probably a trillionth of a percent that scientist knows of the whole truth about this universe. So you spent your life believing in unproven truth as long as its acceptable to the society.

Humans vs. Chimpanzees.
Evolutionists say that the chimpanzee is the closest living relative to humans. For two decades (1984–2004), evolutionists and the media claimed that human DNA is about 99% similar to chimpanzee DNA. These statements had little scientific justification, because they were made before anyone had completed sequencing human DNA and long before sequencing chimpanzee DNA had begun.

Chimpanzee and human DNA have now been completely sequenced and rigorously compared. The differences, which total about 4%, are far greater and more complicated than evolutionists suspected.g Those differences include about “thirty-five million single-nucleotide changes, five million insertions/deletions, and various chromosomal rearrangements.”h Although its only 4%, a huge DNA chasm separates humans from chimpanzees.

Finally, evolutionary trees, based on the outward appearance of organisms, can now be compared with the organisms’ genetic information. They conflict in major ways.

[rcruman]

LOL I follow what I believe, not some other people's views and/or beliefs. Unlike you, I totally accept coming from an ape, I have no problems with it. After having observed the capabilities of primates and their potential and capacity for logic and reasoning, I am actually proud of having been descended from apes. You don't have to enumerate the hoaxes--I believe for myself, and not based on other people's claims--I have my own analytical mind which tells me what is logically acceptable or not. So it's ok

RODION

then how come there's still apes? dapat nag-evolve na tanan.

Peace!

[Sinyalan]

mao ba, so kung maka prove ko ug magic motoo ka nga naay Ginoo nga nag create aning kalibotana? saman?
Good luck on proving magic!

magic man kaha meaning kanang mga paranormal.
Paranormal is magic? - maybe you are referring to anomalous phenomenon mao nga you think that's magic.

How about proving something that you can "magically" create a human being without the use of science? Can you do that? How about teleporting yourself without the use of science, just like "abracadabra" or "hocus-pocus" or better yet waving a wand. Can you do that?


concerning sa imong question..."where do we go?" imo na ng kaugalingung desisyon sir. Basat ayaw lang ipugos nga sakto ka nya sayup mi. kay mamugos man sab ko nga sakto mi. hehehe.
It's a question not a decision... you're twisting it. Ug wala ko mamugos pre... it's up to you if you think namugus ko. Do you think that "where do we go" was a sort of pugsanay? I think you got it wrong.

[IdontCare]

my bad, its already a LAW.
very misleading napod, evolution priests!? its not even a religion.

unfortunately these self correcting measures is non evident in "religion/religious" affairs....taking outdated text claiming that any inconsistencies with observed evidence are just "tests of faith." Or claim "irreducible complexity," which is just another way of saying "I'm too stupid/lazy to try and understand it so I'm just gonna say 'God did it.'"

oh im sorry but that was just a joke. Evolutionist priest was a joke.


oh yes it is evident, as you can see the theologies are evolving making it more accurate and biblical.

Butwe dont changed the bible because that is our evidence, unlike other people out there tampering with the evidence just to prove that they are correct, thats sad.

[IdontCare]

mao ba, so kung maka prove ko ug magic motoo ka nga naay Ginoo nga nag create aning kalibotana? saman?
Good luck on proving magic!

magic man kaha meaning kanang mga paranormal.
Paranormal is magic? - maybe you are referring to anomalous phenomenon mao nga you think that's magic.

How about proving something that you can "magically" create a human being without the use of science? Can you do that? How about teleporting yourself without the use of science, just like "abracadabra" or "hocus-pocus" or better yet waving a wand. Can you do that?


concerning sa imong question..."where do we go?" imo na ng kaugalingung desisyon sir. Basat ayaw lang ipugos nga sakto ka nya sayup mi. kay mamugos man sab ko nga sakto mi. hehehe.
It's a question not a decision... you're twisting it. Ug wala ko mamugos pre... it's up to you if you think namugus ko. Do you think that "where do we go" was a sort of pugsanay? I think you got it wrong.

tubaga sa, unsa man ni siya oi. Motoo ba ka kuhng ma prove nako nga tinood ng magic motoo ka nga naay Ginoo kay magduda man gud ta nimo kusog ra ba kaau ka molimod.


So magic is not paranormal? hahahahaha

making a human being w/o the use of science hmmm as if science can create a human being. Teleporting w/o the use of science as if science have created a time machine.


Here is a thinker...a brainless organism was able to produce a philosopher, thats magic and illogical.

God an intelligent being was able to produce a philosopher hmmm magical yes, but logical as well.


An Intelligent Designer maka produce ug intelligent design

A brainless organism maka produce ug intelligent design?

asa may mas logical ani?


your turn to wave your magic wand.

[rodsky]

then how come there's still apes? dapat nag-evolve na tanan.

Peace!

Here is a good analogy to explain this. Take a look at the branches of a tree. Don't tell me if magtubo ang bag-ong sanga sa tree, mamatay na dayon ang pikas nga sanga? It doesn't necessarily mean that if there is a new branch in the evolutionary tree, the old branches must die...they will follow their own evolutionary path. Again, please read and digest carefully--kani ra man ang kinahanglan para makasabot sa theory of evolution--nothing else.

Astronomer Carl Sagan is the best person to explain this in a very straightforward and layman's terms manner. Here is an example of one of his lectures. Very nicely explained.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYzx6...eature=related

-RODION

[Sinyalan]

tubaga sa, unsa man ni siya oi. Motoo ba ka kuhng ma prove nako nga tinood ng magic motoo ka nga naay Ginoo kay magduda man gud ta nimo kusog ra ba kaau ka molimod.
hahhaha... nibasa ka sa akong tubag pre? I said, "Good luck on proving magic". Unsa pa man diay imong gusto? Nga dili man ko motoo ug magic.

So magic is not paranormal? hahahahaha
Sige kuno ug naa kay ikahatag nga not related to paranormal activity nga totally magic gyud.

making a human being w/o the use of science hmmm as if science can create a human being. Teleporting w/o the use of science as if science have created a time machine.
Unsa man tawn ni oi, wa man tingali ko mo sulti ug tape recorder... naglibog naman tawn ka pre. gituyok ra man nimo akong statements. Ingna lang gud nga dili mahino nimo. tapos. end of story.

Here is a thinker...a brainless organism was able to produce a philosopher, thats magic and illogical.
hahahaha... here's a thinker, that's scientific phenomenon not magic. Organisms - science identified that not magic. hehehehe...

God an intelligent being was able to produce a philosopher hmmm magical yes, but logical as well.
So says the bible... hahahahaha... here's another thinker pre, if your god is so intelligent... did he describe how the body works? Did god gave you all the specific functions what your body is all about? wa man tingali sa. If you argue that kong isuwat tanan sa bibliya - mobaga ug maayo.... naa man lagi medical books nga pirting bagaa nga mas baga pa sa bibliya.

An Intelligent Designer maka produce ug intelligent design
--- so as the bible says, este the creationist mind think about it kasi there is no counter-productive arguement against evolution science. As the creationist would always argue. intelligent design... let's borrow rcruman's favorite words... naay verse sa bible ang words nga "intelligent design"?

A brainless organism maka produce ug intelligent design?
Pre, you keep repeating yourself... there is no argument on this except read the top portion.

asa may mas logical ani?
you're equating logic to your intelligent design? hehehehe... nice, you need more logic. hehehehehe...

your turn to wave your magic wand.
hey, don't ask me... it's your stand to prove magic in the first place. Besisdes, I think I asked you to wave your wand first... Remember?

[Sinyalan]

@ RODION

That's a good video pre...