Asa lage bradier
Taasas istorya.. simple ra kaayo ang panguta.. Pila nani ka thread pulos ra sigeg ad hominem.
I present na lage dayon kay aron at discussan..
Unsa man imong pasabot? Ang kang Diokno?? I think gi tubag nana nako sa lain nga poster if imong ma trace diri..
Maybe if imong tanawon ang akong previous posts naa didto ang akong tubag...
Sige para maklaro ni nato.. sugdan natos sugod..
The fact is I'm trying to start ug tarong nga discussion here, but all I get is pabuta2x and imputation. Kapoya nimo ika storya oe. haha
Sige sugod ta..
Kung mo sugot ka.. ani..
Whether or not corrupt si Diokno because of what Andaya told about him? ...
Mao na imong pasabot? Kapoy pud kaayo bradier ako pa mangita ug evidence on the contrary nga ikaw man ang nag accuse.
The fact is ikaw man ang nag accuse ikaw unta ang mag present ug facts.
Unya ako na nuon ang papangita-on nimo? hahaha
I don't think that is how discussions/debates works.
Pero I'll give you the benefit of the doubt as one of the senior more experienced members here.
"Whether or not corrupt si Diokno because of what Andaya told about him? ... "
So sugot ka ani??
If sugot ka.. then as the accuser please present some facts regarding his corruption..
please lang para maka move forward ta, kapoy kaayo mag basa sa imong responses nga ad hominems. Else, I will also be forced to counter your ad hominems and as experienced members here, we wouldn't like that don't we?