
Originally Posted by
firestarter
Actually kaning imong gi ingon nga "equal justice", mao na ang gitawag ug "equal protection" sa atong Constitution.
Naay discussion ana sa mga katiguwangan, and whether one likes it or not. It is never fair for all. Medyo elitista ang decision sa korte ani, in ruling nga ang equal protection applies to different classes.
Meaning, there is the same treatment to the same class. The is the grim reality.
Ani, take for example, naay pobre nga si Juan naay kaso involving drugs, then dia si Peter Lim nga naay case involving drugs. Sample lang ni.
Equal Protection of the law, would require both to have lawyers to represent them in court. However, Equal Protection does not transcend to societal classes, kay si Peter Lim nabutang man sa Class A society because he has the money, while Juan who belongs to the Class C or D society.
Peter Lim can afford all the top notch law firms there is available that money can afford, however, Juan could not because of monetary limits. Diha ra kutob ang equal protection.
Mao nang gitawag ug "The same treatment for the same class". HOWEVER, this does not mean because pobre i EJK lang diretso. There is always that due process, and due process applies to everyone.
Karon balik ko sa common argument, kay nagtuyok2x naman gyud ta ani. Unya mo balik naman pud ni sa "kung pobre EJK, kung Datu Due Process", so atong i base sa example.
Si Jaguar diay, tumba man, si Espinosa diay, Ang mga Parojinogs, si Mayor Ampatuan nangatumba man, si Richard King tumba man, and these are mga datu ug mga powerful. Tumba man gihapon.
Maong mobalik ta sa sulti ni digong nga naay mga Mayors, Police, Judges and even Generals nga involved ani, and these people are well protected, it takes a special kind of operation para ani nila.
Dili lang pud bisan kinsa nga police ang motira aning mga tawhana.