L.A. Lakers

[The_JACKAL]

Not sure if I'll be happy for the win or be sad about it but it was a nice blowout game by the Lakers over the Knicks. If the Lakers can keep the pick I'd rather let them trade it for a not-so-old vet that can help this team turn things around specially in terms of how to win the game.

[Quilluaz]

Not sure if I'll be happy for the win or be sad about it but it was a nice blowout game by the Lakers over the Knicks. If the Lakers can keep the pick I'd rather let them trade it for a not-so-old vet that can help this team turn things around specially in terms of how to win the game.

hahaha. two tanking teams playing each other. boring game.

anyway, this years top pick is definitely worth keeping. The draft class is deep. Have you seen Malink Monk play? the kid has a great case for the number 1 pick.

[The_JACKAL]

hahaha. two tanking teams playing each other. boring game.

anyway, this years top pick is definitely worth keeping. The draft class is deep. Have you seen Malink Monk play? the kid has a great case for the number 1 pick.

Honestly wala pa jud ko nakakita nila but I'll start right after the playoffs I've heard a few names but Monk is not on the list so far but Ill include him

[Quilluaz]

Honestly wala pa jud ko nakakita nila but I'll start right after the playoffs I've heard a few names but Monk is not on the list so far but Ill include him

My money is still on Markelle Fultz though. Monk has been making a lot of noise lately.

[Disturbing Calm]

hahaha. two tanking teams playing each other. boring game.

anyway, this years top pick is definitely worth keeping. The draft class is deep. Have you seen Malink Monk play? the kid has a great case for the number 1 pick.

the kid is a natural scorer and very athletic but his wingspan is a nah, terrence ross 2.0 in my eyes. markelle fultz, lonzo ball, josh jackson, dennis smith jr. and jason taytum would be my top 5 prospect this year.

[Quilluaz]

the kid is a natural scorer and very athletic but his wingspan is a nah, terrence ross 2.0 in my eyes. markelle fultz, lonzo ball, josh jackson, dennis smith jr. and jason taytum would be my top 5 prospect this year.

my money is on Markelle Fultz. Im also high on Dennis Smith Jr.

sa ako lang pud ni. Im really skeptical about Lonzo Ball's game. I dont really see how it translates into the NBA. The weaknesses are just glaring.

I think Ball will have a fine NBA career. But he needs to change a lot about his game if he wants to be a superstar. I could be wrong though.

[fish]

my money is on Markelle Fultz. Im also high on Dennis Smith Jr.

sa ako lang pud ni. Im really skeptical about Lonzo Ball's game. I dont really see how it translates into the NBA. The weaknesses are just glaring.

I think Ball will have a fine NBA career. But he needs to change a lot about his game if he wants to be a superstar. I could be wrong though.

the only glaring problem with lonzo ball is how he shoots the ball --- very awkward... he uses his right hand, yet he flicks the ball from his left shoulder. hehehe!

other than that, i don't think there is a major problem with him.... he is very athletic, he looks like jason kidd when he is running with the ball, he looks like steph curry with his crossover, he is a better defender than steph curry...

although fultz is a very strong player... he looks like a combination of harden and john wall.

[Quilluaz]

the only glaring problem with lonzo ball is how he shoots the ball --- very awkward... he uses his right hand, yet he flicks the ball from his left shoulder. hehehe!

other than that, i don't think there is a major problem with him.... he is very athletic, he looks like jason kidd when he is running with the ball, he looks like steph curry with his crossover, he is a better defender than steph curry...

although fultz is a very strong player... he looks like a combination of harden and john wall.

on the contrary, I dont think his stroke is a problem.

In my opinion. sa ako sad nabantayan through research and watching him play.

1.Balls major weakness is his inability to create or attack the rim off pick and roll plays. especially when the guard goes over the screen. he mostly just passes it to a teammate, doesnt shoot midrange jumpers or attack a mismatched center. So his halfcourt play in the NBA is still suspect.

2. He struggles finishing when challenged and shies away from contact.

3.He is not a better defender than Steph. how can you tell? Lonzo hasnt played an NBA game yet. it remains to be seen.
Lonzo is a decent team defender. He is pretty terrible one on one though.

Why Lonzo Ball isn't the surefire NBA superstar people seem to think he is - CBSSports.com
recently mao ni akong nabasahan na article backed up with stats and facts.

Anyway, it doesnt mean Lonzo is not good. And he can definitely improve his weaknesses and I could be horribly wrong about him. THis is simply my opinion on him

[Disturbing Calm]

my money is on Markelle Fultz. Im also high on Dennis Smith Jr.

sa ako lang pud ni. Im really skeptical about Lonzo Ball's game. I dont really see how it translates into the NBA. The weaknesses are just glaring.

I think Ball will have a fine NBA career. But he needs to change a lot about his game if he wants to be a superstar. I could be wrong though.

but after watching ucla vs washingston game, although washington is a bad team but lonzo has the drive and the passion compared to fultz. it's like he really wanted that game and match up to prove a point. markelle had a good stats but if you watched the game, you can tell he's passive and doesn't have the "it" factor to take over the game but then again i was just basing my opinion after watching the game. but if i were to take between the two right now, i would still take fultz but lonzo is not far behind.

[Quilluaz]

but after watching ucla vs washingston game, although washington is a bad team but lonzo has the drive and the passion compared to fultz. it's like he really wanted that game and match up to prove a point. markelle had a good stats but if you watched the game, you can tell he's passive and doesn't have the "it" factor to take over the game but then again i was just basing my opinion after watching the game. but if i were to take between the two right now, i would still take fultz but lonzo is not far behind.

I didnt really put too much bearing on that game to be honest. The talent level of Balls team is just so much better compared to Fultz's team.

Fultz's team is so bad that they're even a long shot to make it to the NIT. Thats how bad his team is. His coach is even worse. His coach plays two traditional bigs most of the time. Clogging the lanes and not providing enough space for Fultz to operate, but despite that and despite Fultz being the center of the defensive teams attraction, he still manages to put up numbers.

Anyway, If I was a betting man I'd bet on Fultz's game translating better into the pro game. Makita ra nya ni nato next season once they play in the NBA.