FORMER DICTATOR to be buried in "LIBINGAN NG MGA BAYANI"

[RainRiku]

---

Hehe ka.dali ra i.google anang case nga g.mention ngara ui. Grabeh na pud. hehe or hadluk lang jud ka ma.proven wrong? Kay imung g.post ngari na sources GMA STORY rajud ug google keywords against WB, US ug Singapore rulings.

Kani lang sir, para di mausik atu time. Bisan pag niingun na ang US, SG, ug WB na nangawat si Marcos, deny ra gihapon ka?

Ara lng na kutob istorya? nganong wla man na gi file pila ka ka tuig ni labay? hadlok or basin mahimo ra sila ug amaw kung naa na sa court..haha

diay libro sa tinoud nga economista oh..basa2 pud gamay "The Roots of the Philippines Enonomic Troubles" - Ramon H. Myers
ayaw mu pailad anang economista nga naas UP unya nka daog ug Lopez nga award ky kabalo na mo..

[Theko]

Ara lng na kutob istorya? nganong wla man na gi file pila ka ka tuig ni labay? hadlok or basin mahimo ra sila ug amaw kung naa na sa court..haha

diay libro sa tinoud nga economista oh..basa2 pud gamay "The Roots of the Philippines Enonomic Troubles" - Ramon H. Myers
ayaw mu pailad anang economista nga naas UP unya nka daog ug Lopez nga award ky kabalo na mo..

Unsai ngara ra kutob ang istorya? Katung US ruling g.hinay2 naman tu ug implement.. Deny pa. hehe No thank you sir, books regarding the Philippine economy tend to favor one side over the other. Ako g.basa na libro sir kay sa CFA level 1 ug level 2 economics and applications para sure na way bias. Naa kuy PDF if ganahan ka. hehe.

[obelisk]

Kang Marcos sir bag.o rako ni.post sa resulta sa court cases. Ni.follow rako sa imo logic, na tungod kay "alleged" ra tu tanan, dili tu tinuod na nahitabo jud. Kang Marcos bitaw, ni.claim pud ka na "alleged" ra tu.

Edit: Confession is not binding if not done in open court.

Alleged sir meaning wala pa na prove. gisagol nimo imung logic na if alleged kay false diritso.

Confession is not binding but proof is proof which cannot be denied.

[Theko]

Alleged sir meaning wala pa na prove. gisagol nimo imung logic na if alleged kay false diritso.

Confession is not binding but proof is proof which cannot be denied.

Wala pa na prove. Asa man na nimo i.prove para it stops being an allegation? Sa court. Like Marcos, Hitler was never convicted during his lifetime. Therefore, silang duha kay "allegedly" evil ra.

[RainRiku]

Unsai ngara ra kutob ang istorya? Katung US ruling g.hinay2 naman tu ug implement.. Deny pa. hehe No thank you sir, books regarding the Philippine economy tend to favor one side over the other. Ako g.basa na libro sir kay sa CFA level 1 ug level 2 economics and applications para sure na way bias. Naa kuy PDF if ganahan ka. hehe.

"Katung US ruling g.hinay2 naman tu ug implement"..grabe ra pud kahinay oi pila na ga tuig na ni labay..HAHAHAHA
He is not even a Filipino sir..
kana ipa tudlo na nimo sa economista dd2 sa UP ky sa ilang mga article naa sa internet puro morality/adjectives wla ni sunod bisan Eco 101 102..

[Theko]

"Katung US ruling g.hinay2 naman tu ug implement"..grabe ra pud kahinay oi pila na ga tuid ni labay..HAHAHAHA
He is not even a Filipino sir..
kana ipa tudlo na nimo sa economista dd2 sa UP ky sa ilang mga article naa sa internet puro morality/adjectives wla ni sunod bisan Eco 101 102..

G.contempt na gani sir kay ang Marcoses di jud mu give in. And that contempt ruling kay relatively recent raman. So you could say na yes, g.implement jud.

He is not Filipino but the data he used CAN be skewed. It would be better to form your own interpretations stop taking his word for it and form your own ideas. Enlighten yourself and take the CFA exam. (shameless plug)

Appalling to believe na even with court convictions ang mga tao ngari mu.deny gihapon sa facts.

[RainRiku]

If you are talking of philippine economy on Marcos Era..dli ra siya ang ng padagan ato..pero inyo gi blame siya ra..well..haha

Ongping, Sicat ug si Virata

https://books.google.com.sg/books?id...virata&f=false

[RainRiku]

G.contempt na gani sir kay ang Marcoses di jud mu give in. And that contempt ruling kay relatively recent raman. So you could say na yes, g.implement jud.

He is not Filipino but the data he used CAN be skewed. It would be better to form your own interpretations stop taking his word for it and form your own ideas. Enlighten yourself and take the CFA exam. (shameless plug)

Appalling to believe na even with court convictions ang mga tao ngari mu.deny gihapon sa facts.

Di jud mu give in..right.. its like blaming a 25 year old person from its birth to present..


Well i would still believe this person base on economics,
Ramon H. Myers | Hoover Institution (RIP though)
than this oplok here
Emmanuel S. de Dios | UP School of Economics

[obelisk]

Wala pa na prove. Asa man na nimo i.prove para it stops being an allegation? Sa court. Like Marcos, Hitler was never convicted during his lifetime. Therefore, silang duha kay "allegedly" evil ra.

It stops being an allegation if there is Proof. Types of legal evidence include testimony, documentary evidence, and physical evidence. Hence, in Hitler's case, documentary, testimony and physical evidence are seen. Hence, dili na dyod allegation.

[The_JACKAL]

^^ Di mo maghuman ana boss, your just waiting your time on him. Wala na sya or sila mabuhat ana kay SC na nag ingon nga pwede na malubong si Marcos didto. Pasagda-i na sila kay mo undang rana