FORMER DICTATOR to be buried in "LIBINGAN NG MGA BAYANI"

[Theko]

---

Butthurt ng mu ButtIn nga istorya ky offended siya even if wla siyay apil sa arguement..:P

extreme example? okay..haha.. why would you compare a 1930s event with a 1980s..the entire issues are completely different...nya imo pud logic ky? "ky mi ingon man sila..mu tuo nlng pud ko" Logic..did not say he is innocent what i've been searching is where is the proof, ky sa PCGG and ombudsman for 30 years and 900 cases against were "dismissed".

It's not worthy to give you a reference material kung morality ra imong argumento

I'm sorry, I didnt know you were having a private conversation. After all, you were talking using public means. Hehe.

Issues are different but the logic used is the same. For you, no conviction=complete innocence.

Unsa man imung gibasa na cases sir ug g.unsa man nimo pag search? Kay first page pa gani mao ni ako nakit.an:

Marcoses lose US appeal | INQUIRER.net

I'm beginning to think shady na imo sources

[Theko]

Di pa ba diay obvious Gipa obvious pa jud nimo haha


Libre ra bitao mu tou pero dra ra kutob.. "chismis"..naay na recover obviously because Keynesian Economics was used in his time. asa man ka kita niya nga ni commit siya ug crimes or violence mismo ky akong makita sa pictures,video etc. ky mga military ug police raman..mu ingon ka nga siya ang ng declare sa martial law?..that's not how i read the academic meaning of martial law itself

Dara pa ai: StAR - Stolen Asset Recovery Initiative - Corruption Cases - Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos (Switzerland)

Sus, ka.chismoso diay aning WB ui.

Edit: Ang SG pud diay, chismis ra kutob:

http://www.rappler.com/nation/47220-...os-swiss-funds

[RainRiku]

I'm sorry, I didnt know you were having a private conversation. After all, you were talking using public means. Hehe.

Issues are different but the logic used is the same. For you, no conviction=complete innocence.

Unsa man imung gibasa na cases sir ug g.unsa man nimo pag search? Kay first page pa gani mao ni ako nakit.an:

Marcoses lose US appeal | INQUIRER.net

I'm beginning to think shady na imo sources

Butthurt maybe a bit harsh word i beg your pardon..haha

Kabalo npd guro ka asa ang info. PCGG and Ombudsman. It's has been on the news for decades, thier cases.

Here sir for the cases: (karon lng ni nko na search mao ni akong keyword "900 cases marcos" )
Imelda Marcos and her road to vindication | News | GMA News Online

no conviction="complete" innocence..i did not even say it..been searching but all blames ra sa akong makita

wa nay mas shady sa imong source, INQUIRER.net :P ..did not even click it..haha

[Theko]

Butthurt maybe a bit harsh word i beg your pardon..haha

Kabalo npd guro ka asa ang info. PCGG and Ombudsman. It's has been on the news for decades, thier cases.

Here sir for the cases: (karon lng ni nko na search mao ni akong keyword "900 cases marcos" )
Imelda Marcos and her road to vindication | News | GMA News Online

no conviction="complete" innocence..i did not even say it..been searching but all blames ra sa akong makita

wa nay mas shady sa imong source, INQUIRER.net :P ..did not even click it..haha

All blames? Even if you dont believe INQ, if you search the case they were referring to kay you will find out the truth.

Really, imo source against a US ruling, against a World Bank report, against a SG court ruling kay story sa GMA? Shady indeed! So even with all my sources, imo pa i.deny na nangawat jud si Marcos and ni.commit siya'g crimes against the Philippines based on a GMA story? Wow.

[obelisk]

Di man tu fact sir, alleged ra tu kang Hitler based on your definition of what "alleged" means. Bisan pag naay war wa man gihapon ni stop ang jurisdiction sa mga courts, especially the international courts existing at that time. Ergo, Marcos and Hitler are both heroes.

You can check this link para kang Hitler The Holocaust - World War II - HISTORY.com . There is real proof and statements from Hitler himself regarding the killing of jews.

Kang Marcos kay naa lagi court pero wala may resulta. Pila na ka dekada ning agi, wala gihapon na convict. So if naa dyod real proof like Hitler's reign, then convicted na unta na sya.

[Theko]

You can check this link para kang Hitler The Holocaust - World War II - HISTORY.com . There is real proof and statements from Hitler himself regarding the killing of jews.

Kang Marcos kay naa lagi court pero wala may resulta. Pila na ka dekada ning agi, wala gihapon na convict. So if naa dyod real proof like Hitler's reign, then convicted na unta na sya.

Kang Marcos sir bag.o rako ni.post sa resulta sa court cases. Ni.follow rako sa imo logic, na tungod kay "alleged" ra tu tanan, dili tu tinuod na nahitabo jud. Kang Marcos bitaw, ni.claim pud ka na "alleged" ra tu.

Edit: Confession is not binding if not done in open court.

[RainRiku]

All blames? Even if you dont belive INQ, if you search the case they were referring to kay you will find out the truth.

Really, imo source against a US ruling, against a World Bank report, against a SG court ruling kay story sa GMA? Shady indeed! So even with all my sources, imo pa i.deny na nangawat jud si Marcos and ni.commit siya'g crimes against the Philippines based on a GMA story? Wow.

Do you even read?..haha.."Here sir for the cases: (karon lng ni nko na search mao ni akong keyword "900 cases marcos" haha EZ )"

So even with all my sources

Where? INQ.Net nah..

[Theko]

Do you even read?..haha.."Here sir for the cases: (karon lng ni nko na search mao ni akong keyword "900 cases marcos" haha EZ )"
Where? INQ.Net nah..

Hehe ka.dali ra i.google anang case nga g.mention ngara ui. Grabeh na pud. hehe or hadluk lang jud ka ma.proven wrong? Kay imung g.post ngari na sources GMA STORY rajud ug google keywords against WB, US ug Singapore rulings.

Kani lang sir, para di mausik atu time. Bisan pag niingun na ang US, SG, ug WB na nangawat si Marcos, deny ra gihapon ka?

[RainRiku]

Dara pa ai: StAR - Stolen Asset Recovery Initiative - Corruption Cases - Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos (Switzerland)

Sus, ka.chismoso diay aning WB ui.

Edit: Ang SG pud diay, chismis ra kutob:

PCGG welcomes Singapore court decision on Marcos' Swiss funds

Like what i say na recorver dba..keynesian economics gani..kapila naman na gi argue sa court..nya asa naman na run?

[Theko]

Like what i say na recorver dba..keynesian economics gani..kapila naman na gi argue sa court..nya asa naman na run?

Haha g.argue sa court and na.CONVICT na gani Naa pa gani ngara na di na siya pwede mu step in American soil. Lahi cguro imo quantum of evidence na kailangan sir noh: "THEORETICAL proof beyond reasonable doubt", kay ang na.prove sa US ug SG beyond reasonable doubt raman without taking into account the theory of John Keynes