Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29
  1. #11

    Quote Originally Posted by H.Wolowitz View Post
    i think mas maayu mag create ug separate thread ani nga topic kay mao mn jd ni unod ug ang "dapat rason" nga ato pili-on ang saktung manok for president para natu

    need ur help for other candidates kay so far kang DU30 ra ako nakit-an hehe pls lang ug reply then ako na paste sa original post para ma-consolidate

    at least ma-compare natu ilang plataporma in one thread lang ba, so sayun ra pag decide

    stick to the topic lang ta mga sir ug mam and discuss objectively their platforms..

    to the mods, if feel ninyu nga dapat ni siya i-merge sa existing thread, okay ra naku hehe

    so aku sugdan...

    Duterte's Platform

    https://www.youtube.com/embed/XDtZRDuDzLM?wmode=opaque

    Poe's Platform

    Platform - Senator Grace Poe GREEN MONITOR

    Roxas' Platform

    Continuity of Daang Matuwid

    Binay's Platform

    8 VP Binay Presidential Platforms that Sound Far Too Good to be True
    Ngano walay kang Miriam?

    My administration will bequeath to the next President a better and stronger nation than what I will inherit from this administration. In 2022, I will turnover to my successor a nation that is more prosperous, a people more united and prouder of their leaders, and political institutions that are more stable.

    I commit to invest in people, in public infrastructure and in political institutions.
    I commit that the Philippine economy will grow faster than ever before, that it will be truly inclusive by making sure that real incomes of workers will increase over time.

    We will achieve the goal of higher and sustained economic growth by investing heavily in public infrastructure. Our roads, bridges, urban transit systems, airports and seaports are crumbling. We need to build them up at par with, if not better than, our ASEAN neighbors.
    We need to prepare our people for a more modern, more competitive global economy. We need to educate them, take care of their health, and feed them so they will become productive members of a growing work force. Only by investing in people can we truly make growth inclusive. Only if the young are educated and healthy can they benefit from growing economic prosperity.

    We will continue to support the Conditional Cash Transfer Program but we will plug the program's leakages. We will also reduce the cost of running the program by involving local authorities in implementing it.

    We need a vibrant and more productive agriculture hand in hand with a strong manufacturing. So we have to invest in agriculture productivity enhancing projects - irrigation, farm-to-market roads, water impounding facilities, post-harvest facilities, new seed varieties and research and development.

    We will invest in political institutions. It's been thirty years since we restored democracy in the Philippines. Yet, political institutions remain shaky. There exist no stable political parties in the real sense of the word. The Filipino people cannot hold accountable a political party for the mistakes of its candidates because it disappears as soon as the offending elected official leave office. This has to be corrected by passing a law authorizing the use of public funds to support dominant political parties.

    I will support the recent Supreme Court decisions on PDAF and the DAP. They espouse the appropriate roles of the President and Congress in the use of public funds. The decisions ought to be supported not resisted.

    When elected, my first act is to have the Freedom of Information Act (FOI) enacted into law. This is an important tool to promote public accountability.
    I will restore meritocracy in government. Political parasites, incompetents, and unproductive workers will have no place in my administration.

    I will recruit the best, the most competent, the most experienced, the most honest men and women to assist me run my administration.

    The Filipino people will feel secure under my administration. They will feel secure at home, on the streets and their place of work. My administration will aggressively fight the war against illegal drugs that proliferate in most cities and towns in the country.

    We will run the government's finances responsively. First, we will reform the 19-year old tax system, making it fairer, more responsive to changes in the economy, simpler to administer, and in sync with our ASEAN-5 competitors.

    Second, we will right-size government. We will start by conducting a swift review of ALL programs and projects of government. A Task Force will be created for each major department as soon as we get elected. We will hit the ground running on Day One (July 1st 2016). But there will be no slowdown in government operations.

    Third, we will keep government deficits manageable by keeping it below three percent of gross domestic product (GDP), even as we aggressively build public infrastructure.

    On her health

    I had just filed my certificate of candidacy at the Commission on Elections and someone wrote an open letter that says, "If you're really healthy, if you're really free from cancer, why don't you show all your medical records to the entire public?" I ask you: Have you seen a provision in the Constitution requiring a candidate to show medical records? There's no such thing.

    But, assuming, for the sake of argument that these records exist and I am willing to turn them over, although with all the concomitant burdens--first, the financial burden; pangalawa, kakalat nang kakalat iyan hanggang sa hindi na natin alam kung alin diyan ang totoo; at pangatlo, para maintindihan ninyo, hindi papayag ang ospital na maglabas ng medical records kung hindi papayag ang pasyente--ano naman ang karapatan ng isang tao na naglalakad diyan sa kalye, at bigla na lang siyang tatanungin, "May medical records ka ba? Kasi mukha kang taong may medical records eh." Papayag ba kayo?

    Isa pa, bakit ang aking medical records magiging paksa ng usapan natin tungkol sa pulitika? Ang pulitika ay tungkol sa peace and order. Ngayon, pilit ako na dinadala sa pulitika. Kapag inilabas ko ang lahat ng medical records ko, hindi na ang well-being ng ating bansa ang pag-uusapan kundi ang well-being ng aking mga kalaban sa pulitika. Kaya, umpisa na lang, ayaw ko dahil, una wala ito sa batas, at, pangalawa, wala itong maidudulot na kagandahan sa ating gobyerno.

    Ako ang nagka-cancer, ako mismo ang nagsabing nagka-cancer ako, at ako mismo ang nagsabi na doon ako sa St. Luke's Global City nagpagamot. Ako rin mismo ang nagsabi na ang doktor ko, ang dating Health Sec. Esperanza Cabral, oncologist si Dr. Gary Lorenzo, pulmonologist si Dr. Ruth Divinagracia.

    Sabi 'wag ako iboto dahil maari akong mamatay. Kung ganoon pala ang ikinakampanya nila, eh ngayon pa lang maari akong mamatay! Puwede ako masagasaan ng bus o jeep diyan sa labas. Gusto lang nila ako siraan! Besides, can't you see me? Can't you see that I can stand straight and I can look you in the eye? What else do you want? Why are you so nasty? What government do you want to grow into if this is your attitude? Magtulungan tayo. Let's have a sense of shared destiny, not shared destruction. 'Yan ang problema sa Pilipinas eh.

    On running alongside Sen. Marcos

    It's not my function to defend [Sen. Marcos]. He should defend himself. I think he is capable of defending himself. He is perfectly capable of intellectualizing the situation he is in.

    He was my student at the U.P. College of Law. I saw Mr. Marcos in class as more than an average student. As his former professor, I just think he does not devote enough time to his homework. He dropped out of class.

    I have not seen prima facie evidence that he killed someone, raped someone, or burned a house, that he violated the Penal Code. Wala namang alegasyon na siya mismo gumawa. Noong Martial Law, maliit pa lang siyang bata.

    There is no allegation that he himself sinned against his neighbor. We are going against what the Bible said: "The sins of the father should not be visited upon the son." I am a church-going Catholic. I weighed these matters very carefully, I assure you. I wrote an entire book on theology and religion, and that's my humble conclusion.

    Bigyan natin siya ng pagkakataon dahil nanalo naman na siyang senador. Nanalo siya--ibig sabihin the greater majority do not have opposition to his being a public servant.

    On Sen. Marcos covering up for Marcos crimes

    That's possible. In fact, the voting might show that it is likely. But unless I see prima facie evidence, I cannot be guided by thoughts that are negative against a fellow man. We cannot punish someone on the basis of suspicion. I can't support that as a lawyer.

    On customs administration

    I understand the present system is chaotic. The many legislation and issuances affecting customs and tariffs have to be codified in one document and it has to be updated in the light of recent trade agreements. Hence, we need this Act.

    Let us not have the illusion that the approval of this Act is a magic bullet that will solve the corruption at the Bureau of Customs. The solution there is to appoint a few good men to run BOC and for Malacanang to stop meddling with BOC. Corruption at the BOC will cease only if not tolerated by Palace officials.

    On tax reforms

    The Philippine tax system is 20 years old. It needs to be overhauled. But major tax reforms are best done at the start of each administration when the President has the clear mandate from the voters. I promise to reform it within six (6) months of my administration.

    The objectives of the reform are: (a) to make the tax system in sync with its ASEAN-5 competitors; (b) to make it administratively simple (c) to make it fairer; and (d) make it responsive and higher yielding in order to finance the increasing needs of a growing economy.

    There will be a lot of benchmarking with other ASEAN-5 peers. For the first three years, my administration will aim to shoot for the average number of steps. On years four to six we should try to be better than our ASEAN-5 neighbors. Cutting red tape at the local government level will be my top priority. Well performing local government units (LGUs) will be rewarded with additional intergovernmental grants.

    Regulations at the Bureau of Customs and the regulatory bodies (ERC, SEC, BSP, DENR, and others) will be reduced drastically.

    On infrastructure investment

    The Philippine government should set aside at least 5% of its resources for public infrastructure for it to catch up with its ASEAN-5 neighbors and to sustain strong growth. Its poor public infrastructure is a major constraint to growth.

    Among the major projects are the following:

    - A modern, international airport
    - An entirely new railway system from Manila to Sorsogon
    - A modern, integrated urban transit system in Metro Manila with lines reaching urban communities in Bulacan, Rizal, Cavite and Laguna
    - One mixed-use government center (with adjacent residential, commercial, and entertainment facilities) in the National Capital Region
    - One mixed-use government center (with adjacent residential, commercial and entertainment facilities) in each of the 17 regions.
    - One major project per region for the 17 regions
    - One major project per province (81 provinces)

    For maximum impact and in response to the greater sense of urgency, these projects will be done simultaneously. Some will be done on pure PPP, some hybrid type (government will finance the construction and then will bid out the management and maintenance of the project after construction), and some by government through the usual public procurement procedure. In order to make the facilities affordable to citizens, the government will not require a premium from winning contractors.

    In fact, in some cases, because of external benefits such as reduced traffic, lower pollution, etc., government subsidy maybe allowed in some of these public infrastructure projects.

    On the financing side, we estimate that we have to allocate an enormous amount ranging from P819 billion in 2017 to P1.3 trillion in 2022. But we cannot build modern infrastructure on the basis of promises alone. It will have to be financed through better tax administration, tax policy reform, and government borrowings.

    On economic liberalization

    The first best solution is to amend the restrictive provisions in the Philippine Constitution which have discouraged the entry of foreign investors into the country. Compared to its ASEAN-6 counterparts, the Philippines has attracted the least Foreign Direct Investments. That is proof enough that we are lagging behind.

    [Speaker Feliciano Belmonte's] proposal is to amend [the provision on foreign ownership] not by amending the Constitution, but by adding certain provisions there: the phrase "as the law might provide." So he is calling for an amendment to the Constitution, but in another way. I don't know if the young people in this country would agree to that proposal, because it places the Constitution at the mercy of politicians. I don't know if the young people today wish for our Constitution to be dictated to by foreigners. All of these have to be studied, possibly by means of a referendum.

    First of all, we have to look at the figures for Foreign Direct Investments. If the figure is rising, then we are doing something right. If not, then there is something we are not doing that some countries have already done. I would say that these will become a subject matter between lawyers who specialize in comparative law--in that way, we will realize, or I hope manage, to make a conclusion on how they were able to increase Foreign Direct Investments in the country.

    Final statement

    The Freedom of Information bill deserves to be passed first if only to enhance transparency and public accountability. The posting of information on the official websites is not a substitute for the FOI bill. What is posted on the website is discretionary. The administrator chooses what information to disclose and what to suppress. With the FOI, concerned parties can ask specific information from department secretaries or agency heads, and the latter are duty bound to comply. That is what the public wants. That is what enhances transparency and accountability--not the selective posting of public information.

    Ladies and gentlemen, come, join hands together, and let us face the future without flinching and with full faith and confidence that God will be our guide in our country.
    https://www.facebook.com/notes/miria...c_location=ufi

  2. #12

    Thumbs up TY Inday messy_meh for a very well enlightening info which i didn't know that, very well said ... are you taking up law?

    Quote Originally Posted by messy_meh View Post
    FYI lang
    Miriam is the author of the Archipelagic Baseline Law which reaffirmed our country’s claims to its territorial waters, including its extended continental shelf, economic zones, and the Kalayaan Islands off Palawan and the Scarborough Shoal in the western seaboard. The law immediately drew “strong opposition and solemn protest” from China.

    Before the passing of this law, the Philippines’ existing baselines, as defined by Republic Act 3046 and amended by RA 5446, are not compliant with the parameters set under UNCLOS. On 10 March 2009, the President of the Philippines Gloria Macapagal Arroyo signed into law Republic Act 9522 in accordance with the deadline set by UN.

    "Before we rush to a baseline bill, lawmakers should first have the benefit of advice from international law experts. Otherwise, to a great extent, we lose our sovereignty over our own internal waters. That would be anomalous, because our archipelago will become an open maritime highway. Filipino fishermen will have to compete in our own waters with foreign fishermen," Senator Santiago said a year before her baseline bill was enacted into law.

    "I cannot defend a bill that will turn over our internal waters to foreigners, and run the high risk of being declared as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court,” continued by Santiago, who is also a constitutional law expert.

    https://www.facebook.com/MDS2016/photos/a.1448594232096653.1073741828.1448236475465762/1674117476210993/?type=3&theater







    Philippine ranking on 'economic freedom' improves
    NOTE: News link courtesy of sunstar.com.ph

  3. #13
    C.I.A. DEMONOCIETY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    9,753
    Blog Entries
    199
    Quote Originally Posted by anggwaponi View Post
    then if si Duterte sab kay iya daw adtuon sa China to talk sa ilang pangagamhanan which i don't think China will back down on there stand sa Spratly Group of Islands
    disadvantage ni digong d cya mosukol sa china

  4. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by anggwaponi View Post
    Philippine ranking on 'economic freedom' improves
    NOTE: News link courtesy of sunstar.com.ph
    Quoted ra na from the link Sir I provided.

  5. #15

    Lightbulb bisan pa dakong Bisaya DU30 pero tungod iyang baruganan, di ko mubotar n'ya ... China should follow/obey UNCLOS

    Quote Originally Posted by DEMONOCIETY View Post
    disadvantage ni digong d cya mosukol sa china






    Duterte open to talks with China, joint exploration at disputed sea
    NOTE: News link courtesy of Inquirer.net
    Last edited by anggwaponi; 02-06-2016 at 07:12 AM. Reason: spell

  6. #16
    Sulayi ninyo Gubat ang China ... kay mao rajud na solution ... kutob ratas isog2x ani ... kanang UNCLOS wajud na effect promise ... way palaban sa mga Amerkano gubat tas China, kanang amerkano dili na makiggubat sa China kay dako kaau na sila Negosyo sa China ....

    Agree nalang ko ni Binay ug Duterte kay sa walay plano ... kay sa mahurot nalang nag invade nila tanan spratley.

    Ug Gusto mo makig Gubat sa China ... pag Open Economy samo parihas sa gibuhat sa China a long time ago, tan-awa na superpower na sila .. kita diri sa Pinas daghan against sa Open Economy ambot ninyo mura mo ug mga Genius ...

    Mao rana solution para ma rich ang country ( Open Economy, kang duterte dili man gani 100%, 70% ra ) unya kaya na mo palit ug panggubat dili mag salig sa Amerkano nga maau pud kaau mo atik ....

    Maau to si Macoy ( marcos) sa una gi claim ang Kalayaan kay ang China ato nga time weak pa kaau ug military ..

    DU30 For President ... bahala bati nawong .. ( nawong raman bashihanan anang uban butaran ) ...

    Ug makig gubat tas China way isa ka adlaw kuha nang Pinas .. pastilan ninyo ... ang atong pagka Nationalismo dili na ma adopt karong panahuna panahun panang Rizal kay ang Kalibotan nag Evolve, ambot unsa napud kahay sunod anang Open Economy ... ( Gubat sa Economiya mo tuo ko ana nahitabo na Karon .. kita mga Pinoy way kabalo ana kay puros ras Salida ABS-CBN gi tan-aw, blind sab kaau ang mga tawo sa Pinas ana kay Close Economy manta, buhatan lang ta ug SM sa mga Oligarch puerting lipaya sa mga amaw na pinoy .. Traffic gud inig opening )

    Ang uban supak kaau anang Open Economy unya mag OFW ad2 manarbaho sa mga Foreign Investor sa singapore, hongkong etc ... mga walay prinsipyo, kaugalingon ray gi tan-aw aning kadaghanan sa Pinoy ...

    Dagko sueldo kay trabaho maoy nangita ug tawo dili tawo maoy nangita sa trabaho ... mao na epekto sa Open Economy unlimited ang Business Opportunity ... unlike sa thingking nga pahimoslan ang natural resouces, sila ray na rich, etc .. loslos na nga reasoning panahon panang Rizal ug Bonifactio nga reasoning ....

    Ang Singapore naa diay Natural Resources .... nga daghan man kaau Foreign Investor did2 ... depende rana sa nagdala ...
    Last edited by amingb; 02-08-2016 at 02:59 PM.

  7. #17
    "Nganu wla man ko sa list. Tsk batia."
    Si D30 dna mo sukol sa China ky d mana mga adik ang China, mga Abno mana Hehehe. Knsa mo sukol sa mga abno. hehe. Ang main kontra ni D30 ang mga Adik. Hehehe
    Last edited by Istudyante-Ni-Pikoy; 02-08-2016 at 02:40 PM.

  8. #18
    Pili lang mo ... sa nagmumura o sa nambubulsa ... ang uban diha maau kaau mo atik gentlemen kaau mo sulti pero naay self interest ang iyaha Bulsa .. parihas sa sila tanan way labot ni Duterte ...

    DU30 For President ...

  9. #19

    Lightbulb atu na bai ;)

    Quote Originally Posted by amingb View Post
    Sulayi ninyo Gubat ang China ... kay mao rajud na solution ... kutob ratas isog2x ani ... kanang UNCLOS wajud na effect promise ... way palaban sa mga Amerkano gubat tas China, kanang amerkano dili na makiggubat sa China kay dako kaau na sila Negosyo sa China ....

    Agree nalang ko ni Binay ug Duterte kay sa walay plano ... kay sa mahurot nalang nag invade nila tanan spratley.

    Ug Gusto mo makig Gubat sa China ... pag Open Economy samo parihas sa gibuhat sa China a long time ago, tan-awa na superpower na sila .. kita diri sa Pinas daghan against sa Open Economy ambot ninyo mura mo ug mga Genius ...

    Mao rana solution para ma rich ang country ( Open Economy, kang duterte dili man gani 100%, 70% ra ) unya kaya na mo palit ug panggubat dili mag salig sa Amerkano nga maau pud kaau mo atik ....

    Maau to si Macoy ( marcos) sa una gi claim ang Kalayaan kay ang China ato nga time weak pa kaau ug military ..

    DU30 For President ... bahala bati nawong .. ( nawong raman bashihanan anang uban butaran ) ...

    Ug makig gubat tas China way isa ka adlaw kuha nang Pinas .. pastilan ninyo ... ang atong pagka Nationalismo dili na ma adopt karong panahuna panahun panang Rizal kay ang Kalibotan nag Evolve, ambot unsa napud kahay sunod anang Open Economy ... ( Gubat sa Economiya mo tuo ko ana nahitabo na Karon .. kita mga Pinoy way kabalo ana kay puros ras Salida ABS-CBN gi tan-aw, blind sab kaau ang mga tawo sa Pinas ana kay Close Economy manta, buhatan lang ta ug SM sa mga Oligarch puerting lipaya sa mga amaw na pinoy .. Traffic gud inig opening )

    Ang uban supak kaau anang Open Economy unya mag OFW ad2 manarbaho sa mga Foreign Investor sa singapore, hongkong etc ... mga walay prinsipyo, kaugalingon ray gi tan-aw aning kadaghanan sa Pinoy ...

    Dagko sueldo kay trabaho maoy nangita ug tawo dili tawo maoy nangita sa trabaho ... mao na epekto sa Open Economy unlimited ang Business Opportunity ... unlike sa thingking nga pahimoslan ang natural resouces, sila ray na rich, etc .. loslos na nga reasoning panahon panang Rizal ug Bonifactio nga reasoning ....

    Ang Singapore naa diay Natural Resources .... nga daghan man kaau Foreign Investor did2 ... depende rana sa nagdala
    ...


    i always totally disagree nga walay mahimo ang Ph just because China is now a superpower


    and though di ni daugon through analysis only that in general pildi o lupig gyud ang PH sa China when it comes to military firepower pero di diha matapos ang tanan


    yes, UNCLOS may have little or no effect at all but if Ph wins it's case then legality-wise advantage na ta


    now, can the UNCLOS decision then be fully implemented to force China to cease and move out of those isles ... i don't think so tungod sa kadako sa gasto na sa ilang pagtukod sa permanent structures. besides, UNCLOS has no police armed o power to go after China for us to retake the isles. however, the Ph is not alone as Vietnam, Malaysia, India, and Japan is also fighting it's claimed all against China


    what it has got to do with our case then? well, IMHO it may take time for Ph to retake or reclaim those isles but kapag may tiyaga may linaga


    i don't believe that by continuing to pursue our case or our sovereign rights on those isles as it's inside of Ph EEZ is not anymore applicable for our being Nationalistic


    i'm not against Open Economy ... what i'm against is China being a signatory to UNCLOS yet China stepped on Philippine-rights because China knows of our military handicapped. so mosugot lang ta o mao ba ni ang ipasabot sa brotherhood-of-nation?


    it has been explained many times we can try to end diplomatic relation with China, as well, boycott China-made products. majority will say nga di na pwede kay tanan daw made-in-China na. well, kun ing-ana gyud atung perception so di gyud pwede


    but in my previous explanation, look at Vietnam, Cuba, Iran, Libya before and now NoKor ... kaya man lagi nila without US. kita pa kaha nga China ra. ako lang na gi "ra" kay i'm sure kun ma wa ang China mas daghan ang magukod puli like India, Japan and SoKor


    we should not set aside our being Nationalistic bahalag naay pakapin ibulsa





    Del Rosario quits DFA, cites health
    NOTE: News link courtesy of Inquirer.net

  10. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by anggwaponi View Post
    i always totally disagree nga walay mahimo ang Ph just because China is now a superpower


    and though di ni daugon through analysis only that in general pildi o lupig gyud ang PH sa China when it comes to military firepower pero di diha matapos ang tanan


    yes, UNCLOS may have little or no effect at all but if Ph wins it's case then legality-wise advantage na ta


    now, can the UNCLOS decision then be fully implemented to force China to cease and move out of those isles ... i don't think so tungod sa kadako sa gasto na sa ilang pagtukod sa permanent structures. besides, UNCLOS has no police armed o power to go after China for us to retake the isles. however, the Ph is not alone as Vietnam, Malaysia, India, and Japan is also fighting it's claimed all against China


    what it has got to do with our case then? well, IMHO it may take time for Ph to retake or reclaim those isles but kapag may tiyaga may linaga


    i don't believe that by continuing to pursue our case or our sovereign rights on those isles as it's inside of Ph EEZ is not anymore applicable for our being Nationalistic


    i'm not against Open Economy ... what i'm against is China being a signatory to UNCLOS yet China stepped on Philippine-rights because China knows of our military handicapped. so mosugot lang ta o mao ba ni ang ipasabot sa brotherhood-of-nation?


    it has been explained many times we can try to end diplomatic relation with China, as well, boycott China-made products. majority will say nga di na pwede kay tanan daw made-in-China na. well, kun ing-ana gyud atung perception so di gyud pwede


    but in my previous explanation, look at Vietnam, Cuba, Iran, Libya before and now NoKor ... kaya man lagi nila without US. kita pa kaha nga China ra. ako lang na gi "ra" kay i'm sure kun ma wa ang China mas daghan ang magukod puli like India, Japan and SoKor


    we should not set aside our being Nationalistic bahalag naay pakapin ibulsa





    Del Rosario quits DFA, cites health
    NOTE: News link courtesy of Inquirer.net
    Ang pangutana diha brad ug kinsay naay Rightful claimants anang Lugara kay they have also the evidence nga ilaha na ... kita pud pinas naa pud ...

    Mag lisod jud ang UNCLOS anang decide ug ma implement ba nanag 200 miles nautical economic zone which China does not Agree anang Tribunal nga wala daw sa ilaha Jurisdiction ...

    Ang ako lang samtang sayo pa Protect the Island nga atong gi Claim ... ang Blema kay nakuha nas China unsaon na nimo pag bawi ug Weak kaau atong Military .. Kanus-a paman tawn ta ma Strong Militarily nga Kawatan man ni atong Goberno puros ra Personal Interest ...

    Agree ko anang Joint Venture ug Bilateral Talks ... kay dili jud na mag daog diha ...

  11.    Advertisement

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

 
  1. 2016 Presidential Election
    By callsyn_bigbird in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-09-2015, 06:37 AM
  2. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 05-13-2015, 06:35 AM
  3. Bong Revilla for 2016 presidential race
    By pepponeskie in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 270
    Last Post: 06-20-2014, 08:49 PM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-11-2010, 08:05 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top