Nganong UP Diliman raman ang recognized university sa australia?

[kalihi_kid]

---

state university man ...........

[<tag>]

Mao ni ang gsulti nga kuwang ra gyud ang "Tops Again"

[rebarinstaller]

Imo kinahanglan is authorization to work by way of a Professional License sa location imo gi trabahoan. Whether Australia, US o Canada. And to get the Prof License, need ka educational background and exam if naa. Problema lang is e assess na sa country imo padulngan if ang imo course sa Pinas is equivalent ba sa educational requirement nila sa specific industry.

Case in point: Graduate and Board passer, ECE from USC. Trying to get Prof Engr License sa States for either electronics Engr of Communications Engr. Pag assessment sa iya TOR, equivalent siya sa 4 yr Bachelor Degree sa US for Electrical Engineering. So, dile match sa iya course. pwed xa mu apply for jobs sa Electrical na requiring Electrical Engr Educ. And pwed xa mu kuha Engineer in Training na position, which could lead up to Professional Engr license after 3 yrs experience sa Electrical Engr field.

Back sa topic sa TS, an assessment sa TOR ra mka sulti if ma recognized ba jud sa host country imo education sa Pinas. I doubt UP ra jud.

http://www.aohuamigration.com/english/List%20of%20Recognised%20Overseas%20Institutions.p hp

[rebarinstaller]

Mao ni ang gsulti nga kuwang ra gyud ang "Tops Again"

We can also research sa worldcertification.org kung naa ba ang CIT. Echeck pod sa abet.org kung naa ba ang CIT...wala gani ang USC hahaha

- - - Updated - - -

Mygad jud? hahaha...speechless bai...mag hunahuna sa ko ug unsay maau ereply. ugma nako moreply ky padung na me uli sa campo...hehehe

Di lang ta maglalis ani bai kung naay thesis or non-thesis. hehehe.

[St_Michael]

http://www.aohuamigration.com/english/List%20of%20Recognised%20Overseas%20Institutions.p hp

Ok got it. Salamat sa link. Here is my thoughts and I would stick to the question sa title sa thread which is why only UP is recognized sa Australia.

My though is not because UP is the best PH school offering Engineering or only they pass the standards sa Australia, but the reason why sila ra accredited is UP lang ang nag apply ug accreditation certificate sa Australia. Its just like mga certification sa schools. Even if high quality ka, if wala ka nag pa certify, dile ka e recognize. Maybe other schools should follow suit sa UP and apply for accreditation sa ila courses. Maybe it would need some adjustments sa curricula but in the end, if they could say that they are certified and recognized in Australia (or any other country) it would be a good for their students and their marketing also.

Ang problema lang sd TS kay if more than 2 years na ka ni gradute sa school, even if ma add pa sila sa recognized list, dile ghapon magamit imo education applying for working visa (sa Australia na case lang).

[<SMILE>]

There are six international agreements governing mutual recognition of engineering qualifications and professional competence. In each of these agreements countries/economies who wish to participate may apply for membership, and if accepted become members or signatories to the agreement. In broad principle, each country/economy must meet its own costs, and the body making application must verify that it is the appropriate representative body for that country/economy.


Agreements covering tertiary qualifications in engineering
There are three agreements covering mutual recognition in respect of tertiary-level qualifications in engineering:

The Washington Accord signed in 1989 was the first - it recognises substantial equivalence in the accreditation of qualifications in professional engineering, normally of four years duration.

The Sydney Accord commenced in 2001 and recognises substantial equivalence in the accreditation of qualifications in engineering technology, normally of three years duration.

The Dublin Accord is an agreement for substantial equivalence in the accreditation of tertiary qualifications in technician engineering, normally of two years duration. It commenced in 2002.


Agreements covering competence standards for practising engineers
The other three agreements cover recognition of equivalence at the practising engineer level i.e. it is individual people, not qualifications that are seen to meet the benchmark standard. The concept of these agreements is that a person recognised in one country as reaching the agreed international standard of competence should only be minimally assessed (primarily for local knowledge) prior to obtaining registration in another country that is party to the agreement.

The oldest such agreement is the APEC Engineer agreement which commenced in 1999. This has Government support in the participating APEC economies. The representative organization in each economy creates a "register" of those engineers wishing to be recognised as meeting the generic international standard. Other economies should give credit when such an engineer seeks to have his or her competence recognised. The Agreement is largely administered between engineering bodies, but there can be Government representation and substantive changes need to be signed off at governmental APEC Agreement level.

The International Professional Engineers agreement commenced in 2001. It operates the same competence standard as the APEC Engineer agreement but any country/economy may join. The parties to the agreement are largely engineering bodies. There are intentions to draw IPEA and APEC closer together.
International Engineering Agreements