Nuclear Energy Source? What do you think?

[æRLO]

you are exgerating, most of the example you gave are using technologies before the 90's nuclear power plant are now safer using current technology!!!... with that kind of mentality we will never move forward but instead we are going backward....

its like you are saying that our enginers are stupid, because any nuclear power plant here will not be stable....

IM FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY...

exaggerating? take a look at what happened recently in Japan, 2010 pa intawn to. Bisan 50-decade old or state-of-the-art technology, fission is dangerous if ma-unstable. Was that an exaggeration? Bisan gani mga countries like United Kingdom, Sweden ug United States, naay several incidence of minor accidents with regards to compromised reactors in the 2000s--imu pang pasaligon sa capabilities sa Pilipinas? We don't have the money to afford and maintain one. We have one in Bataan since the 70s, never used it--because naa sa earthquake prone zone ang Pilipinas. Can we afford transportation, processing, storage, disposal of nuclear materials? Can we prevent it from terrorist exploitation?

[chris_bern]

if we are going to have a NUCLEAR PLANT here in the philippines it will indeed lessen the cost of electricity. but regarding our financial capabilities to handle NUCLEAR plants in safety is a thing that our government is not yet capable of.

indeed we have pinoy engineers that can handle efficiently a nuclear plant in the near future.. but if in times of natural calamities such as earthquakes, tsunami's or worst very strong typhoons are we sufficient enough? ayaw ingna na pugson na pud nato ato gobyerno na mangutang sa WORLD BANK or IMF para lang mapohonan ang mahimo solusyon ana.

but if we are now economically stable to the point that our fellow pinoy workers will not opt to work abroad anymore because they feel they are financially secured here in our country then maybe pwede na siguro na magtukod ato gobyerno ana..

[bad_juju]

i would go for nuclear energy jud, since minimal ra kaau ang air pollution compared sa fossil fuels and mo barato jud ang kuryente ani since dako man xag output... ang concern lang nako is asa xa ibutang nga di xa maapektuhan ug earthqaukes or typhoons..

[bim27142]

coal or natural gas nalang ta ani oi, hehehe... d jud mada og mo sugal ta sa nuclear... lisud na basin ma mutant na tang tanan diri sa pilipinas!

[salbahis]

exaggerating? take a look at what happened recently in Japan, 2010 pa intawn to. Bisan 50-decade old or state-of-the-art technology, fission is dangerous if ma-unstable. Was that an exaggeration? Bisan gani mga countries like United Kingdom, Sweden ug United States, naay several incidence of minor accidents with regards to compromised reactors in the 2000s--imu pang pasaligon sa capabilities sa Pilipinas? We don't have the money to afford and maintain one. We have one in Bataan since the 70s, never used it--because naa sa earthquake prone zone ang Pilipinas. Can we afford transportation, processing, storage, disposal of nuclear materials? Can we prevent it from terrorist exploitation?

NBP was never used because of political reason....

[Eve's Apple Project]

daghan man pwede nato makuhaan og power..i am for this but unahon sa nato ang uban ways. Wind, Solar & even Tidal energy (or combination of the 3).

[rics zalved]

bitaw sayang gyud atong Bataan Nuclear Power Plant, barato ra unta kuryente nato ron.. tsk tsk tsk..

[anggwaponi]

--- updating ---





DOE pushes study on nuclear energy
NOTE: News link courtesy of MSN.com

[rickflag]

NBP was never used because of political reason....

So true, that is the lasting legacy of Cory. Now we have one of the most expensive electricity in southeast asia.

[bettafishenthusiast]

wla jd lain solution as of now sa ato shortage sa electricity kundi nuclear energy nya ato source karn dli jd enough para sa development sa future,.