Page 11 of 48 FirstFirst ... 89101112131421 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 474
  1. #101

    Quote Originally Posted by Brownman_politiks View Post
    you really have to prove yourself to me bai nga sweto ka kay im not buying your pretensions. obvious kaayo sa imong mga post nga taphaw imo pagsabot sa federalism kay si google ra imong teacher.

    stop fooling yourself, you are no expert, be humble.
    I never said Im an expert, ikaw ra man gud tig "label" Mo label man gani ka winner ka. I dont need to prove myself. ikaw man angay mag be humble dinha. ayaw baleha ang storya.

    You may not post propaganda materials here.
    You may not post anything political into non-political threads (this includes lame references / jokes) unless you can directly link it with the circumstances involved.
    When posting articles about current events or news, please, please cite your sources (e.g. website links, book names, page numbers, etc.)! We're no tabloid but we're also no CNN/AFP either. So let's keep everything in the middle; cite your sources for any news or current events that you post.
    its clear rule here is to back up your sources... hence Im obliged unlike you na sige magpataka (not a single link). Di man gani concern nimo ang Financial consideration about federalism when that is the biggest consideration on any talks of federalism.

    Like I said kapila na gi discuss ang federalism dire, your main points na answered na nako na, balik2x na. So unlike you i wont have hard time sleeping lol cause for me its just a matter of recalling. Nasa financial aspects na gani ako mga posts.

  2. #102
    Quote Originally Posted by Romeojin View Post
    I never said Im an expert, ikaw ra man gud tig "label" Mo label man gani ka winner ka. I dont need to prove myself. ikaw man angay mag be humble dinha. ayaw baleha ang storya.



    its clear rule here is to back up your sources... hence Im obliged unlike you na sige magpataka (not a single link). Di man gani concern nimo ang Financial consideration about federalism when that is the biggest consideration on any talks of federalism.

    Like I said kapila na gi discuss ang federalism dire, your main points na answered na nako na, balik2x na. So unlike you i wont have hard time sleeping lol cause for me its just a matter of recalling. Nasa financial aspects na gani ako mga posts.
    go ahead convince me pa... LOL


    I think you should take your medication na.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by iron_dick View Post
    dili ko ka sulti kng unsa ang dapat i-customize ky dili man ko mangbabalaod.. what i mean is a tweaking sa federal law kanang mo fit nato..

    well u said na naa ta innovate na product diba.. do u think competitive na? diba dili ky kita mismo mga pinoy dili man mo support even ang govt ky ang problem dili man ganahan og innovation so ang mentality ky dili open minded.. in short crab mentality ba.

    we can change everything if we're open minded and kill our crab mentality attitude
    sakto ka di ta ka sulti unsay e customize kay wa pa man, unya na kung naa na.

    magsabot ra unya ang states og ang gobyerno kung unsa ang SHARED/CONCURRENT POWERS nila. sabot pod sila unsay ilang mga exclusvie powers. depende na na nila. and if there are conflicting nga provisions, magsabot sila sa mechanism unsaon pag resolve.

  3. #103
    ang imung argument ROMEOJIN nga dili kaya ang financial nga ASPETO sa federalism sa rason nga gamay ra ilang income....
    kabalo diay ka pila ilang income ug kabalo ka pila ilang ma expenses just incase federalism will push through..

    judgmental raman kaayo nga MO INGON KA dili nila kaya mo barog sa ilang kaugalingon tungod kay matawag nimu ug pobre ang ilang PROVINCE..

  4. #104
    [QUOTE=Brownman_politiks;17535281]go ahead convince me pa... LOL


    I think you should take your medication na.

    - - - Updated - - -



    sakto ka di ta ka sulti unsay e customize kay wa pa man, unya na kung naa na.

    magsabot ra unya ang states og ang gobyerno kung unsa ang SHARED/CONCURRENT POWERS nila. sabot pod sila unsay ilang mga exclusvie powers. depende na na nila. and if there are conflicting nga provisions, magsabot sila sa mechanism unsaon pag resolve.[/QUO

    HEHEHE........

  5. #105
    Nindot unta nang plano ni duterte federalismo pro ang mga congressman mosupak ani dili sila mobutar ni rudy kay mawagtang man ilang trabaho ug pangwarta so no chances makadaug si rudy ug mao nay iyang plataporma

  6. #106
    I like duterte 's idea. Federalism.

  7. #107
    Quote Originally Posted by ROCK2X View Post
    ang imung argument ROMEOJIN nga dili kaya ang financial nga ASPETO sa federalism sa rason nga gamay ra ilang income....
    kabalo diay ka pila ilang income ug kabalo ka pila ilang ma expenses just incase federalism will push through..

    judgmental raman kaayo nga MO INGON KA dili nila kaya mo barog sa ilang kaugalingon tungod kay matawag nimu ug pobre ang ilang PROVINCE..
    pangutana ana kahibaw ba ka unsa ng federalism ? give me links which shows mas cheaper to run a federalism than the current one.

    kana lang daan magtukod ka ug new STATE SC kada state gasto na kaayo na. Plus suweldo ug benefits (pila na ka milyon) sa huwes, staff; building maintenance; operating expenses another gasto and thats the judicial side palang na sa federalism. naa pa other redundancy on other departments.

    maypa i.explain nimo in details na kaya gasto with federalism. Dili lang puro sugar coated words, sunod walay thorough explanations.

  8. #108
    Quote Originally Posted by Romeojin View Post
    pangutana ana kahibaw ba ka unsa ng federalism ? give me links which shows mas cheaper to run a federalism than the current one.

    kana lang daan magtukod ka ug new STATE SC kada state gasto na kaayo na. Plus suweldo ug benefits (pila na ka milyon) sa huwes, staff; building maintenance; operating expenses another gasto and thats the judicial side palang na sa federalism. naa pa other redundancy on other departments.

    maypa i.explain nimo in details na kaya gasto with federalism. Dili lang puro sugar coated words, sunod walay thorough explanations.
    mag question gani ka sa gasto pasabot wa jud ka kasabot kung unsa ng federalism. hahaha.

    - - - Updated - - -

    ultimo gani ang pag construct sa balaod matud pa nimo di puede magka pareho ang balaod sa state og federal state kay ma defeat ang purpose sa federalism. hahahaha.

    stop pretending, swallow your pride and admit kutob ra ka sa google.

  9. #109
    Quote Originally Posted by Romeojin View Post
    pangutana ana kahibaw ba ka unsa ng federalism ? give me links which shows mas cheaper to run a federalism than the current one.

    kana lang daan magtukod ka ug new STATE SC kada state gasto na kaayo na. Plus suweldo ug benefits (pila na ka milyon) sa huwes, staff; building maintenance; operating expenses another gasto and thats the judicial side palang na sa federalism. naa pa other redundancy on other departments.

    maypa i.explain nimo in details na kaya gasto with federalism. Dili lang puro sugar coated words, sunod walay thorough explanations.
    kaya rana sa kada state mag tukod ug ilahang STATE SC, dili man sad cla mag tukod ug STATE SC nga pareha sa mga dagko2x nga province like sa DAVAO or CEBU kung gamay ra ilang PROVINCE gamay rasad ilang STATE SC. maka cover rana sa cla sa ilang expenses kay ilang kwarta sa JDF ilaha naman lang dili na nila iremit sa supreme court didto sa metro manila, so mao na ilang gamiton to maintain sa ilang STATE SC..

    kung sa tan aw nimu dili kaya sa mga gagmay nga province... pag hatag kuno ug DATA kung pila ma expenses sa ilang STATE sa pagpadagan sa federalism unya pila ilang income. huna2x raman gud na nimu nga dili kaya sa mga gagmay nga province...imu cguro pag sabot kung pila ang expenses sa CEBU sa pag padagan sa federalism mao sad ang expenses sa mga gagmay nga province.........

  10. #110
    Quote Originally Posted by Brownman_politiks View Post
    mag question gani ka sa gasto pasabot wa jud ka kasabot kung unsa ng federalism. hahaha.
    the fact wa ka ka prove until now kanang kaya financially puro lang sugar coating words, ikaw wa gyud kahibaw the topic on hand.

    ibalik nato ang link ni salbahis ... Financing federalism

    What is obvious is that there will be three levels of taxes—federal, state and local government. The matter of financing cannot be ignored “for later.” It has to be part of the ongoing debates.


    ultimo gani ang pag construct sa balaod matud pa nimo di puede magka pareho ang balaod sa state og federal state kay ma defeat ang purpose sa federalism. hahahaha.
    FYI someone pointed out mag.federalism ta with the same laws we have now; meaning NO individual STATE laws, thats why I said it defeats the purpose of federalism. sabta tawon dong oi.



    stop pretending, swallow your pride and admit kutob ra ka sa google.
    ikaw kutob ra sa istorya (as if correct) without backing your words hence maglisod ka tulog with all unanswered rebutals

  11.    Advertisement

Page 11 of 48 FirstFirst ... 89101112131421 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

 
  1. Davao City Mayor Rodrigo "Digong" R. Duterte's speech @ the ATF
    By LytSlpr in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 05-17-2019, 11:21 AM
  2. MERGED: FEDERALISM
    By jonciocon in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 347
    Last Post: 11-10-2009, 01:32 PM
  3. Five Regions Will Survive Federalism
    By Wind Shear in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 11-10-2009, 10:43 AM
  4. The secret between Woods and Federer.
    By LytSlpr in forum Sports & Recreation
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-03-2007, 08:36 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-06-2006, 07:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top