US Supreme Court rules in favor of same-s3x marriage nationwide

[NapoleonBlownapart]

For me, what is right and what is wrong is based on wether it promotes human welfare or not. Clearly, this same-s3x marriage is a move for human equality.

Well my friend you have a different view on "human welfare" because you already said it's no problem for you if anyone wants to marry a dog so I'll just stop because there's no point. LOL I can't argue with you on that.

BTW, naa koy pahimangno sa mga religious zealots dri: Morality is defined by society not by gods or deities. Please remember there are godless people but live in accordance to what is right/wrong in the society. Kay ug mo ingon mog nag base inyong morality sa bible then it OK to have a slave.

No, there were slaves in the bible but it doesn't mean it promotes it. You're on a sinking boat my friend. Relativism is senseless. There are societies that think it's ok to eat another human being. Since morality is defined by society then for you it should be ok because to them it's ok.

[NapoleonBlownapart]

"I'm just saying it's wrong." How so? Be specific and try not to bring up religion as it's just a human-made-up ideology deluding people.

Biologically it's wrong. By common sense it's wrong. The rectum is not their to accept a p***. It doesn't have a purpose. Marriage is instituted so that a man and a woman, by coming together, can start their own family thus "preserving" human kind naturally. SSM cannot do that.

I think Dr. Brown gave a convincing argument against SSM. I encourage you to check the link I posted above.

[NapoleonBlownapart]

Tan-awa ra.. hilig lage jud nig suon2 ning Pinoy.. https://sg.news.yahoo.com/sc-orders-...000000577.html

[johnjob]

Naa mi silingan na bayot unya naay asawa naa pud silay anak usa ,gwapa ra ba ug asawa ug sakto gyud sa height.Responsable pud magdala ug make-up kit while naggunit sa iyang anak samtang ihatod sa asawa.

[dulasnom]

Tan-awa ra.. hilig lage jud nig suon2 ning Pinoy.. https://sg.news.yahoo.com/sc-orders-...000000577.html

sus jud ning atong mga pulitiko, sakay daun sa uso.
pagka-daghan problema sa atong nasud nga dapat unta unahon.
haaahaaaiiii.........

[bleedingboi]

Naa mi silingan na bayot unya naay asawa naa pud silay anak usa ,gwapa ra ba ug asawa ug sakto gyud sa height.Responsable pud magdala ug make-up kit while naggunit sa iyang anak samtang ihatod sa asawa.

Pwede ka maka-bargain ani bai. Buy 1 take 1.

"You use me, and I'll use your wife".

[johnjob]

Pwede ka maka-bargain ani bai. Buy 1 take 1.

"You use me, and I'll use your wife".

Delikado na sir kay duna pa ra bay 2 bilin na bala seniorita sa akoa asawa hehehe. bitaw sakristan man na bataa sa una dre amua kapilya ,maglakaw k-ay gyud nahibong gani mi sa akoa pares.

[yhokz101]

In an empathetic way you shouldn't force someone to change his/her gender when he/she is already happy with it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Leelah_Alcorn

Then it boils down to choices.. and the state of happiness also resides on your decision to be happy or not. Even if you will not conform to the norms in the society and tend to go with how and doing things that makes you happy, there's always something behind your mind that tells you whether your decision/acts is morally correct or wrong. The difference is that some people are very good on convincing their self otherwise.

[Romeojin]

I tend to disagree on this. How do you explain anak sa amo silingan 7 yo palang bayot na. Di man siya pod influenced kay way bayot sa ila family. That's why though I'm straight, I never condemn this people. It's not their fault they were born that way. I have known lots of gays and lesbians and they are successful in their chosen careers and really nice individuals. Aren't we being hypocritical then, when adultery and concubinage is also against the law and yet so many of us are practicing it. It seems like a normal or macho thing to do.

being third *** is a choice. they tend to prefer being third ***.

kanang gay gene had never been throughly proven. If it isnt genetic then clearly mental.
There is no scientific theory could prove that someone is born gay.

There is a law against adultery clearly someone have to sue them doesnt make an observant hypocritical, wa man ta labot ana

hypocritical pa kanang mga pro same *** marriage pero di kadawat makit.an sila kung mag PDA sila di ba mao man ang point ng mga anti basin ma change ang social norm hehehe.

[Romeojin]

Did i ever mentioned about being smart? please read.

"dont say they are a great country" i never mentioned about the country being great, every country has it's flows and allowing same-s ex marriage is a start of an improvement for the US and sooner people will wake up and accept people like them that society considers "unusual".

"in terms of equality base on the decision won by the slimmest of margin." So you're saying if there are more people against the "slimmest margin" they should win even if it's the wrong side? if the "slimmest margin" is in right side that should prevail.

For conversion/reparative therapy check this out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Leelah_Alcorn

Surely by saying that, doesnt make people here ignorant so watch your words.
Sooner the US will wake up having the social norms of ancient Greece

I meant the "US SC 5-4 ruling" that allow same *** marriage, that is won with the slimmest of margin.
One judge even said that the decision had nothing to do with the Constitution; clearly some of the judge were biased on their decision.

Since the test subject committed suicide does it makes therapy a wrong practice ? i doubt the therapy went smoothly as well, he committed suicide cause depression.
We cant blame parents if they send their children into therapy, cause even gay would say they had mental illness.
Its the same concept of placing/confining people with mental illness at the mental hospital/institution so they can be treated or put out of harms way.

"Pro same *** marriage wants to paint a picture that 3rd *** individuals are hopeless to change." Do they need to change their gender? Oh i have a teacher who's gay and supports charity for cancer, poor people, etc. Should he change? or should you?

"pedophilia gene" really? that shouldn't be there because it's definitely not a gender. Think about trying to find a cure for cancer how long does it take? in my personal experience having homosexual friends i can tell they just can't change it. And why are you trying to sound like being someone who's not inside the "male" and "female" gender is wrong? It's all about where the person feels comfortable being himself and being happy.

Cmon dont twist the argument, I didnt implied they change for the worst I meant they should act straight or at least keep it low; being LGBT is a choice. I do tolerate gays/lesbian I got 3rd *** friends as well, even they believe too much na ang same *** marriage; Philippine society is tolerant with gay/lesbian compared to the US who you deem a nation of equality , we had low incident of LGBT violence.

It doesnt make the scientific research youve been saying is correct, cause like you said it takes time as well. Through times those study you said had been proven wrong.

But Im telling you the gay gene research is a dead end, cause there are cases of twins that one became gay and one became straight. that defies genetics basis of being LGBT is innate.

- - - Updated - - -

OT: Respect is earned. It's a long way process. Why should I respect these idiots in Manila who sell their votes? Maayo unta tog sila ray magkalisud, apiktado raba jud tanan.

A saying: Ug wala kay respeto sa akong nasud then wala pud kay makuhang respeto sa akoa.

I still don't get it unsay apekto ni sa akoa ang same-s3x marriage. Murag wala jud koy mahunaan. Last thing pud diay, wala jud namugos nako nga mag katoliko or unsa.

you never practice what you preached.

As if pud naa ra sa Manila ang vote buying