US Supreme Court rules in favor of same-s3x marriage nationwide

[amingb]

---

for me i dont gve a fck if mag unay ang pareha.... we all have freewill... everyone should respect it... regardless if against sa ilaha belief... as long as wala gitamakan ilahang tawhanong katungod... religious rights is not a human rights...

it shouldn't be an issue if we only know how to respect free will..

But mao lagi bro .. mawala ang respetar nimo sa tawo nga ingon ana ... respect pud sila ug dili me ganahan nila as long as no crime committed ...

[bleedingboi]

being gay is not a sin, it's the act and not the person.
bisag bayot siya pero nagpakabuhi siya as lalaki, then wala siya makasala sa iyang pagka-bayot.

I know a gay who works two jobs while studying in college. Sleeps only 4 hours per day, to provide food for his family and allowance for his younger sis.
This gay is more manly and much respected than a jobless, lazy drunkard who thinks he's too good-looking to get a blue-collar job, or too masculine to do laundry.

[salbahis]

But mao lagi bro .. mawala ang respetar nimo sa tawo nga ingon ana ... respect pud sila ug dili me ganahan nila as long as no crime committed ...

ani raman gud para nako.. if di ka ganahan sa usa ka taw... you can keep it... its your right not to like it... you can say it but not in a way nga murag agresibo... always constructive dili destructive... sa mga LGBT pud ug sawayon... pasagdi... dili na need mo baws... lay mahimo ra nang away.... usahay mga OA raman sad gud ning taga LGBT... discrimination dayon... pagka toy2 nalang... grow up sad tawn mo oy... just because LGBT is politically protected doesnt mean being a douche is a privillege... pasagdi if naa mo saway kay normal na sa usa ka society... unless if there is a crime commited...

criticism is not a crime... it should be lesson, an eye opener... it should accepted constructively not destructively... criticism is a POV

the maturity of a person can sometimes be measured how it handles criticism... immature people tend to accept criticism as destructive criticism...

[dulasnom]

I know a gay who works two jobs while studying in college. Sleeps only 4 hours per day, to provide food for his family and allowance for his younger sis.
This gay is more manly and much respected than a jobless, lazy drunkard who thinks he's too good-looking to get a blue-collar job, or too masculine to do laundry.

i respect and would always respect him for what he did.

[akoLoloNinja]

i dont understand whats the fuzz is all about. The court ruling is not about religion or for the LGBT to get married in church. Its for LGBT to enjoy the same benefit as husband/wife gets on marriage, eg. mahimong dependent sa insurance, conjugal properties ug uban pa. You shouldnt drag your religion to this matter and LGBT dont to drag it into religious issue kay civic man ni. Kung dli mosugot ang pare nga kaslon mo sa simbahan wa moy mahimo kay religious ceremony naman na. Ug kamong mga regilious people to be against it kay katungod man sad na nla. Ayaw i-impose inyong belief ngadto nila.

[amingb]

ani raman gud para nako.. if di ka ganahan sa usa ka taw... you can keep it... its your right not to like it... you can say it but not in a way nga murag agresibo... always constructive dili destructive... sa mga LGBT pud ug sawayon... pasagdi... dili na need mo baws... lay mahimo ra nang away....

the maturity of a person can sometimes be measured how it handles criticism... immature people tend to accept criticism as destructive criticism...

Dili man ka e criticize ug tarong jud ka pagkatawo respetaran man jud ka bisan unsa paka ... ang problema man gud naa man gud instinct ning mga straight people nga dili jud maka uyon anang homosexuality nga binuhatan aning mga homosexual nga tawo like anang issue nga same *** marriage or pervertions ...

As a straight person dijud ko ganahan anang nagbuhat ana ma wala akong respetar ...

- - - Updated - - -

i dont understand whats the fuzz is all about. The court ruling is not about religion or for the LGBT to get married in church. Its for LGBT to enjoy the same benefit as husband/wife gets on marriage, eg. mahimong dependent sa insurance, conjugal properties ug uban pa. You shouldnt drag your religion to this matter and LGBT dont to drag it into religious issue kay civic man ni. Kung dli mosugot ang pare nga kaslon mo sa simbahan wa moy mahimo kay religious ceremony naman na. Ug kamong mga regilious people to be against it kay katungod man sad na nla. Ayaw i-impose inyong belief ngadto nila.

Mo trigger man jud sa Religion bro ... kay against the law of nature naman nang gibuhat nila, concern lang me ...

[akoLoloNinja]

Dili man ka e criticize ug tarong jud ka pagkatawo respetaran man jud ka bisan unsa paka ... ang problema man gud naa man gud instinct ning mga straight people nga dili jud maka uyon anang homosexuality nga binuhatan aning mga homosexual nga tawo like anang issue nga same *** marriage or pervertions ...

As a straight person dijud ko ganahan anang nagbuhat ana ma wala akong respetar ...

- - - Updated - - -



Mo trigger man jud sa Religion bro ... kay against the law of nature naman nang gibuhat nila, concern lang me ...

Bro unsa man nang law of nature?
Nganong kung maghisgot man dayn ug Same *** Marriage kay ang acts man dayon sa *** ang atong masud sa hunahuna dayon? Dli diay pwed companionship lang ug ang legal benefits sa marriage couple?
Besides If they are of legal age, what they do their body parts during their intimate moments kinahanglan pa diay nato hilabtan. Ug unsay gusto nlang buhaton nla duha ila nana. Pariha ra na sa banag asawa nga maghimo ug ORAL ***. Kung ang babay ug lalaki max ORAL *** okey ra, dli against sa religion.? Just let them be.

[amingb]

Bro unsa man nang law of nature?
Nganong kung maghisgot man dayn ug Same *** Marriage kay ang acts man dayon sa *** ang atong masud sa hunahuna dayon? Dli diay pwed companionship lang ug ang legal benefits sa marriage couple?
Besides when they are of legal age, what they do their body parts during their intimate moments kinahanglan pa diay nato hilabtan. Ug unsay gusto nlang buhaton nla duha ila nana. Pariha ra na sa tua banag asawa nga maghimo ug ORAL ***. Kung ang babay ug lalaki max ORAL *** okey ra, dli na against sa religion. Just let them be.

Ang Natural Law kay marriage is For Men and Women ... kana ilaha gi buhat kay perversions ( alteration of something from its original course, meaning, or state to a distortion or corruption of what was first intended )

Dili ka makaingon ug companionship lang or legal benefits bro kay part lang na sa ilahang struggle kuno but ang purpose jud is lust ... remember sodom ang gomorrah bro nga gi burned sa Ginoo sa kana nga binuhatan ...

Okay ra ang Oral ug bisan unsa nga form ug sexual activities as long as Legally Married ( for men and women nga couple )

[Romeojin]

And seriously guys, being gay is a sin? What is this, a backwater country who stones people to death and burn suspected witches? To be frank, I am a bit of a homophobe (only towards the guy to guy though, girl to girl s f*cking awesome in my book... just not the butch type please), but calling homosexuality a sin is a bit idiotic. Sin itself was defined in a book which was created by man, and what's more, a fairytale book. So technically, a sin, unless defined by law itself, is juz a matter of opinion created by another man being forcefully imposed to everyone else. So unless anyone can find proof that being gay is a sin other than a fairytale book, lets not be a redneck.

your passport, birth certificate, baptismal certificate etc are fairy tales please do something about it, rather than disrespecting a religion here.

Respect rajud ang problema diri. For me it doesn't matter if you married a dog as long as you didn't step on my rights and vice versa. OA ra kaayo ang uban. Times changed.Adapt or be left behind.

OT: Desperately praying nga naay mag pinusilay ron bahin aning Binay.

RESPECT ? what do you know of respect Nef ?

1. you once posted people in Manila should die.
2. now you praying for death.
3. you got banned for disrespecting a Mod.

Please dont use that word.

Boss disagree ko nimo sa term Homosexuality ang meaning ana is Parihas ug *** for sexual or romantic relationship most likely, not necessarily nga gay or lesbian kay na bias na ang Ginoo ana ... its equal to all nga ning commit anang butanga ... mao na ang pagsabot nako sa gi ingon sa Bible ... mao na nahitabo sa Sodom and Gomorrah .. nag unay na ( ma bayot or ma dili ) mao gi silutan sa Ginoo.


Unlike mo ingon ta ug Homosexual people kana kay it refers to lesbian and gay .....

Naa pud biya nga ma attract ka ug same *** bisan dili ka homosexual ..

"Not all of the terms that have been used to describe same-*** sexuality are synonyms for the modern term homosexuality"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Termin..._homosexuality

Like I said naay group justified it that way.

For me, urge palang they need to resist it not to be controlled by it and also it influence others esp the minors.

[akoLoloNinja]

Ang Natural Law kay marriage is For Men and Women ... kana ilaha gi buhat kay perversions ( alteration of something from its original course, meaning, or state to a distortion or corruption of what was first intended )

Dili ka makaingon ug companionship lang or legal benefits bro kay part lang na sa ilahang struggle kuno but ang purpose jud is lust ... remember sodom ang gomorrah bro nga gi burned sa Ginoo sa kana nga binuhatan ...

Okay ra ang Oral ug bisan unsa nga form ug sexual activities as long as Legally Married ( for men and women nga couple )

And that has just changed. Matud pa sa ruling sa US SC. Its now legal for LGBT too.
Ug kabahin sa biga-biga, dli pre-requisite ang marriage aron magbiga biga pro. they can make do with with that bisag dli pa cla legally married. thats moot.