Strong faith in God BUT Losing hope to Religions

[slabs7]

---

believing in barack obama is not faith....we have not verified barack obama personally but we know he exists because there are a lot of evidence...Tvs, newspapers, books, magazines, radios etc...no need for us to verify him personally...same applies with the rock layers..

on the other hand, god the creator of universe...the uncaused cause... the perfect one..beyond space and time.- this is an extraordinary claim therefor requiring you to provide extraordinary evidence...faith is not an evidence to prove your G0d

naabot man kang obama...stick ta sa imong punto kay perte na nalyoa sa atong lagpot....evolution ta pre evolution...lahi ang ang istorya sa kaso ug lahi ang istorya mahitungod sa sinugdanan sa kinabuhi...creation atong topic...wala ta diri maghisgot ug crime...pagka lagpasa sa imong tama ui...unsa may gitira nimo

hatagi mi ug proof ana imong gipangyawyaw

[yhokz101]

If there is one thing when having a discussion with the like of you, is that whenever they present something scientific in nature with given evidence then they will also rightfully ask real evidence of something not in scientific in nature. Of course we dont exactly expect them to fully understand our terms since to begin with they have rejected before you can even explain to them.

[yhokz101]

O asa na imung reply sa akong post?

Likay man lagi? Ulaw mag binugo noh?

BUGONG UTO-UTONG IGNORANTENG TANGANG KRISTIYANO.

There is no point discussing with such a closed and arrogant person like you. Ako nalay mauwaw para nmo sa imong batasan.. Whatever we would say you disregard. To what point? Its like talking to a fool.. I will not go down to your stupidity.

[Santa Mama]

If there is one thing when having a discussion with the like of you, is that whenever they present something scientific in nature with given evidence then they will also rightfully ask real evidence of something not in scientific in nature. Of course we dont exactly expect them to fully understand our terms since to begin with they have rejected before you can even explain to them.

of course we reject your bible as your evidence of the creator of the universe... bible/quran/ hindu scriptures, etc... those are not evidence of the creator of the universe..

extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence...

your book is just an ordinary evidence therefor is not a proof of your extraordinary claim

[BeginnerME]

Migo, ang ako gipasabot nga evolution is more on changes sa isa ka specie into something better dili kana mahimo ug laing mananap. Akong sample kay from Nigroto (human) -> Cebuanong Gwapo Ako (human).

Kung wla mag mention ug apelike or man-like specie, unsa diay? okay2x (tree of life "aka common ancestors" -> hominids -> human). Cge balik ta sa combined effect of mutations, environmental changes, and natural selection nga mahitabo billion of years thus called Evolution. Paabot ta nga naay mugawas nga laing tao dili gikan sa tao.

Cge ato kuno suwayan nya I-fastforward nato ang evolution after billion years possible cguro na napod mugawas nga specie nga derived from man "man-like" pero dili tao. Atong tawgon sa ngan nga "humanitodilitao"
Posible cguro no? Sakto ba ako pagsabot sa Evolution, logical ba ni?

So, after billion years possible nga matinood c NightCrawler-like from X-men "for the sake of argument lang"? Possible dili? Ay fictional character man diay ni cya, Sorry. dili ni tinood or matinood.

akong gi re-quote akong post kay wla pa matubag.
@AntiBugo
@porbidaman
@Santa Mama

[slabs7]

O asa na imung reply sa akong post?

Likay man lagi? Ulaw mag binugo noh?

BUGONG UTO-UTONG IGNORANTENG TANGANG KRISTIYANO.

tua nasad tag tingorha na ka account gamit...dili mi mailad ana yads

abi kay napiit na iyang @Santa Mama tua siya nigamit sa iyang @AntiBugo aron pakapdayon gihapon

[yhokz101]

of course we reject your bible as your evidence of the creator of the universe... bible/quran/ hindu scriptures, etc... those are not evidence of the creator of the universe..

extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence...

your book is just an ordinary evidence therefor is not a proof of your extraordinary claim

Katigo man diay ka mo tubag ug sakto, kahibaw ka dli na kinahanglan mag name calling kay mo reflect ra pd na nmo.

So mao lage to begin with ang reference if mo mention nag God asa man diay ang pinaka source written document ana, db ang bible? Then if in the first place dili mo acknowledge or even try to say what if ang claims nila tinuod but in a way na dli same pag prove sa science, yet. No, I know dli na nmo buhaton. At the very instant mo quote o refer and usa ka tao sa bible or from links na involving spirituality inyu naman e rject. In short, we can agree to disagree on this. All I can say is believing in something that there is a supreme being (not necessarily the christian God), is not ignorance.