Religion or NO Religion?

[pakinimo]

---

daghan laging ebidensiya pero useless

Funny lage kaau ka sir. Istoryan raman guro ka regular cebuano nia naa kay GUTS mosulti nga ang evidence sa evolution USELESS. hehehehehe. Kahibaw ka unsa ng natural selection sir?

we are talking kung diin ta gikan dili kung na-unsa na ta,
patubaga kuno bisan kinsa pang maayong laki nga scientist diha kung makatubag ba sila sa akong pangutana.
Asa gikan ang materyales nga ginihanglan para sa big bang.
tubaga gyud na ninyo kay Science man kaha inyong basehan,
kay kung dili mo katubag aw believers lang diay gihapon mo.
then mga Pari ug pastor na ninyo ang mga scientists.

Kana imong pangutana sir ORIGINS na, and dli pana ma tubag accurately sa science as of now. Hehehe d nimo madawat nga naay mga butang nga wa ta kahibaw? Mao diay sure na kaau ka and napuno nakas answers gkan sa imong libro nga karaan hehehe.

Ipanglabay nalang ng mga scientist nia ikaw nalang puli sir kay sure naman ka sa imong mga nahibaw an

- - - Updated - - -

“an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection.”
<< Albert Einstein, Ideas and Opinions—The World As I See It (New York: Bonanza, 1931), 40. >>

British scientist, Edmund Whittaker attributed the beginning of our universe to “Divine will constituting Nature from nothingness.”
<< Robert Jastrow, God and the Astronomers, (London: W. W. Norton, 1992), 103 >>

Scientist Robert Jastrow as compelled by the evidence to admit, “Now we see how the astronomical evidence leads to a biblical view of the origin of the world.”

<< Robert Jastrow, God and the Astronomers, (London: W. W. Norton, 1992), 14 >>

Are scientists now convinced that a Creator has left his “fingerprints” on the universe?

“There must be religious overtones. But I think most scientists prefer to shy away from the religious side of it.”[ohn Boslough, Stephen Hawking’s Universe (New York: Avon, 1989), 109.]

As an agnostic, Jastrow had no Christian agenda behind his conclusions. However, he freely acknowledges the compelling case for a Creator. Jastrow writes of the shock and despair experienced by scientists who thought they had squeezed God out of their world.

For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries. [27 <<Jastrow 107>> ]

Puro ramani assertion my friend. What's your point? hehehehehe

[<SMILE>]

Funny kaau ka sir.
1. Science doesnt even spend much time about the origins kay wa ta kahibaw ana and lisud na sya hibaw-on.
2. There are things nga wa mi kahibaw and unsure mi. Ayaw mi ingna nga CERTAIN mi sa among convictions. Hehe. D man mi pareha ninyo nga SURE NA SURE pusta kinabuhi pa kay sure najud bsag wai ebidensya hehehehe


Kung ganahan ka makabalo kung asa gkan ang tawo based on darwinian evolution, pag google sir kay taas kaau na nga process daghan kag kinahanglan masabtan ana. D mani pareha sa inyong blibliya nga pila ra ka sentence ang explanation hehe puros wai ebide


Pagbasa sa ug NATURAL SELECTION sir aron makasabot ka sa basis sa evolution. Kusug kaau mo manaway sa evolution nia wa gani diay mo kahibaw unsa na hehehehe



LOGICAL FALLACY.
heheheheheh

naay mga butang nga d ma explain as of now

But dli na pasabot nga magic2x na sya. Ayaw mi parehasa ninyo.hehehehe

,
Unya nganong makaingon man ka nga gikan ta sa Science kung mao na,
maorag ikaw man tingale ang funny.
Char2x ra diay na ang inyoha, NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF.

- - - Updated - - -

[pakinimo]

,
Unya nganong makaingon man ka nga gikan ta sa Science kung mao na,
maorag ikaw man tingale ang funny.
Char2x ra diay na ang inyoha, NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF.

Sir palihog daw kog quote kung asa dapit nisulti ko nga gikan tas bacteria. hehehe
Pataka raka sulti ganiha ra. hehe

Kuyawa nimo sir noh, imong question ganiha:
Asa diay gkan ang bacteria

karon:
Asa man diay gikan ang tawo, wa man diay moi ebidensya nga gkan sa bacteria.

hehehe usab2x man diay ning imoha, pati ikaw naglibug. Huna hunaa sa sir ayaw e twist imong ipang sulti kay maapil mig kalibug ana

Dugaya nimo kasabot sir. Darwin explained how man came to be, not how the origin of man came to be.

Currently, science doesnt explain how things began, but rather what happened after.

Kuwang kaau kag basa sir mao na resulta puros raka patakag sturya ehehehe

- - - Updated - - -
@<SMILE>

dalia maka likay oh, wa man lage response sa akong last post hehehe balik2x raman imo gisulti ganiha wa man ka mirespond through argument

[<SMILE>]

Sir palihog daw kog quote kung asa dapit nisulti ko nga gikan tas bacteria. hehehe
Pataka raka sulti ganiha ra. hehe

Kuyawa nimo sir noh, imong question ganiha:
Asa diay gkan ang bacteria

karon:
Asa man diay gikan ang tawo, wa man diay moi ebidensya nga gkan sa bacteria.

hehehe usab2x man diay ning imoha, pati ikaw naglibug. Huna hunaa sa sir ayaw e twist imong ipang sulti kay maapil mig kalibug ana

Dugaya nimo kasabot sir. Darwin explained how man came to be, not how the origin of man came to be.

Currently, science doesnt explain how things began, but rather what happened after.

Kuwang kaau kag basa sir mao na resulta puros raka patakag sturya ehehehe

- - - Updated - - -
@<SMILE>

dalia maka likay oh, wa man lage response sa akong last post hehehe balik2x raman imo gisulti ganiha wa man ka mirespond through argument

Palusot pud ay, okay in Scientific studies diin man diay kuno ta gikan.
Gi-magic lang diay ang unggoy. Then looking backwards as what is being asked in this thread, we would end up in the creation of the Universe from where Science deduced where we came from originally. Then my question follows nga bisan unsaon dili gyud nimo matubag.

- - - Updated - - -

Sir palihog daw kog quote kung asa dapit nisulti ko nga gikan tas bacteria. hehehe
Pataka raka sulti ganiha ra. hehe

Kuyawa nimo sir noh, imong question ganiha:
Asa diay gkan ang bacteria

karon:
Asa man diay gikan ang tawo, wa man diay moi ebidensya nga gkan sa bacteria.

hehehe usab2x man diay ning imoha, pati ikaw naglibug. Huna hunaa sa sir ayaw e twist imong ipang sulti kay maapil mig kalibug ana

Dugaya nimo kasabot sir. Darwin explained how man came to be, not how the origin of man came to be.

Currently, science doesnt explain how things began, but rather what happened after.

Kuwang kaau kag basa sir mao na resulta puros raka patakag sturya ehehehe

- - - Updated - - -
@<SMILE>

dalia maka likay oh, wa man lage response sa akong last post hehehe balik2x raman imo gisulti ganiha wa man ka mirespond through argument

Palusot pud ay, okay in Scientific studies diin man diay kuno ta gikan.
Gi-magic lang diay ang unggoy. Then looking backwards as what is being asked in this thread, we would end up in the creation of the Universe from where Science deduced where we came from originally. Then my question follows nga bisan unsaon dili gyud nimo matubag.

[pakinimo]

Palusot pud ay,

Kami sir d mi mag palusot para lang maka daog d pareha ninyo, kay kami mudawat mi nga naay mga butang nga wa mahibaw-an. hehehehe

okay in Scientific studies diin man diay kuno ta gikan.

sir e analyze kuno balik imong gpang sturya ganiha

Imong pangutana: asa ta gkan
darwin says, the ultimate origin of life is the bacteria

nia ngutana ka asa gkan ang bacteria ---> lahi napod ni sya
Science may or may not explain asa gkan ang first formation of life, wa ko kbw if natubag nana or wala.

Nonetheless, it is irrelevant to evolution. Kita naka sa imong nonsense nga question sir?
Bsag matubag na or di imong pangutana kung asa gkan ang bacteria, dli na magpausab nga gkan ta sa evolution according to science. Bsan pag gkan nas lubot sa bato ng bacteria or lubot sa imong ginoo, d ghapon mausab ang explanation sa evolution.

Gi-magic lang diay ang unggoy. Then looking backwards as what is being asked in this thread, we would end up in the creation of the Universe from where Science deduced where we came from originally. Then my question follows nga bisan unsaon dili gyud nimo matubag.

Hisgot nsad kag unggoy, unsa diay imong pag sabot sir, ang modern humans gikan sa unggoy? Mao na imong pagsabot sa evolution sah?

[quantum]

Im sorry to spoil you sir but NO SCIENTIST AGREES AS THE BIBLE PORTRAYS IT.

Kana maoy ASSERTION. sir nimo.

Puro ramani assertion my friend. What's your point? hehehehehe

Those words were coming straight from your dieties, the scientists. Even Darwin's theory to me is only an assertion.

Assertion - a confident and forceful statement of fact or belief.

My point? It is very clear as daylight from the quotes i've copy-pasted. I thought all along you know so much as you seem to portray yourself as such?

[<SMILE>]

Kami sir d mi mag palusot para lang maka daog d pareha ninyo, kay kami mudawat mi nga naay mga butang nga wa mahibaw-an. hehehehe

sir e analyze kuno balik imong gpang sturya ganiha

Imong pangutana: asa ta gkan
darwin says, the ultimate origin of life is the bacteria

nia ngutana ka asa gkan ang bacteria ---> lahi napod ni sya
Science may or may not explain asa gkan ang first formation of life, wa ko kbw if natubag nana or wala.

Nonetheless, it is irrelevant to evolution. Kita naka sa imong nonsense nga question sir?
Bsag matubag na or di imong pangutana kung asa gkan ang bacteria, dli na magpausab nga gkan ta sa evolution according to science. Bsan pag gkan nas lubot sa bato ng bacteria or lubot sa imong ginoo, d ghapon mausab ang explanation sa evolution.


Hisgot nsad kag unggoy, unsa diay imong pag sabot sir, ang modern humans gikan sa unggoy? Mao na imong pagsabot sa evolution sah?

mao diay nga na-atheist ka kay kutob ra ra man gud kas evolution.
e-broad ang imong huna2x or else gusto lang gyud ka ug discussion nga medyo pabor.

okay, Naa koy pangutana,
Asa man ang missing link?
Then do not answer me hypothetically I want verifiable scientific proof.
Science man kaha NO religion man kaha.


If you still don't know what a missing link is, don't worry. No one knows what a missing link is, because they are missing! We've never seen one. They're still missing. Evolution depends on innumerable missing links, each of which lived in the unobserved past and have gone extinct, replaced by their evermore evolved descendants.
What's a Missing Link?

[crono+death ward]

[pakinimo]

mao diay nga na-atheist ka kay kutob ra ra man gud kas evolution.
e-broad ang imong huna2x or else gusto lang gyud ka ug discussion nga medyo pabor.

imo nasad ge link ang atheism ug science
eehhehehehe
wa sad diay ka kahibaw unsa ng atheism

tanan nalang nimo gi hisgotan dinhi ikaw mismo wa kahibaw sa imong gi yawit hehehe suicide

okay, Naa koy pangutana,
Asa man ang missing link?
Then do not answer me hypothetically I want verifiable scientific proof.
Science man kaha NO religion man kaha.

hehehe since wala pa nakit-an ang "missing link" pagsabot sad nimo wala giud na sya nag exist?

as of now sir, wa ghpon kay gi present nga argument para mu attempt ug challenge nako. Puros raka assertion. hehehehe wa pagiud ka kahibaw sa imong gipang sulti.

mention pakag unggoy, sunod sir sturya gali ka dapat kahibaw ka sa imong gisturyahan dli kay dungog2x lang. hehehe

- - - Updated - - -
@<SMILE>

hala sir, wa sad cguro ka kbw sa difference sa ARGUMENT ug ASSERTION? basin nag libog raka ba mao na wa kai klaro ehehehe

basa2x sad ug evolution ug natural selection sir before nimo e question kay imong mga pangutana walay sense

[crono+death ward]

[IMG]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-9_91hWMxCUs/UGdopFYxPOI/AAAAAAAAAE8/Jjtxdlse2YA*******486696_506614732684947_1762234789_n.jpg[/IMG]