Religion or NO Religion?

[porbidaman]

---

@quantum, diara ang tubag migo...
If evolution is real why are there still monkeys? › Ask an Expert (ABC Science)

[battouter]

this arguement is so over rated. we are not living at those chaotic times it is our past so we must stop living in the past, past is past thats it. people back then are not as advance as it is today why blame the past? i agree with you it is wrong to kill. but dont look at the religion as a whole, tan-awa nalang kada tao ug unsay binuhatan pasagdi na unsay iyahang reilihiyon, theist ba or atheist, walay pili. ug kabalo sad ko sa mga binuhatan sa mga dagko sa simbahan aware kaayo ko ana pero dili pasabot nga ma wala akoang pagtoo sa ginoo.

you must be kidding, look up irag and syria. mass killings in the name of religion because ironically, one sect of the same religion disagrees with the others interpretation.

let's make things clear, we are living still in chaotic times.

[battouter]

to clear things up, evolution has been backed by "scientific theory" which different from just a "theory".

if people still believe in the creation myth. i must say, the so called god who created all things must really, really like beetles, seeing that there are 400,000 species of it this earth.

[slabs4]

to clear things up, evolution has been backed by "scientific theory" which different from just a "theory".

if people still believe in the creation myth. i must say, the so called god who created all things must really, really like beetles, seeing that there are 400,000 species of it this earth.

ok back up by THEORY copy that

[Vedder]

ok back up by THEORY copy that

Pa englishx2 dayun o para ingnon naay utok.

Ikaw gihapon ang pinaka-bugo diri sa istorya.net hahahaha

[battouter]

ok back up by THEORY copy that

correction SCIENTIFIC THEORY not THEORY. there is a major difference with the two.

A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation. As with most (if not all) forms of scientific knowledge, scientific theories are inductive in nature and aim for predictive power and explanatory force.

[Vedder]

Maypag e translate na nimog bisaya kay mag lisod nag sabot ug english.

[slabs4]

Pa englishx2 dayun o para ingnon naay utok.

Ikaw gihapon ang pinaka-bugo diri sa istorya.net hahahaha

maypa tubagon nimo ng pangutana ni noy tapos!

- - - Updated - - -

correction SCIENTIFIC THEORY not THEORY. there is a major difference with the two.

As with most (if not all) forms of scientific knowledge -unsa di ie ang ubang forms? belief rasad?

mura man sad ug gikan sa atheistsm padung sa agnostic atheistsm

[anubiz]

you must be kidding, look up irag and syria. mass killings in the name of religion because ironically, one sect of the same religion disagrees with the others interpretation.

let's make things clear, we are living still in chaotic times.

dili ko mag kig lalis about iraq and syria naa mas lawm pa nga rason ana dili rana sa relihiyon. part of it yes pero dili gyud na mao ang rason.

[Vedder]

maypa tubagon nimo ng pangutana ni noy tapos!

- - - Updated - - -


As with most (if not all) forms of scientific knowledge -unsa di ie ang ubang forms? belief rasad?

mura man sad ug gikan sa atheistsm padung sa agnostic atheistsm

Atheistsm? ATHEISTSM? ATHEISTSM?

HAHAHAHAHAHA PAGKA BUGO HAHAHAHAHAHA