Religion or NO Religion?

[pakinimo]

---

Unsa mai d nimu tuhuan? Ang Ang Ginoo sa Biblia nag sulti; ayaw pangawat, ayaw pangabit, ayaw pagpatay. Kung d ka mo too niya it means nga pwidi raka mubuhat ani.

Logical fallacy

Pero imuha sad na mego. Lainlain man ta ug panglantaw sa unahan.

Pero mao pod ni akoa e ingon nimu dili tanang religion tinuod, naai uban ginigusyo,

2 Corinthians 2:17
Unlike so many, we do not peddle the word of God for profit. On the contrary, in Christ we speak before God with sincerity, as those sent from God.

Naa pod uban dili sugo sa Ginoo kundi Sugo sa Tao.

Mar 7:7-8
7 Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. 8 For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups:and many other such like things ye do.

assertion

[SioDenz]

Exactly There is no tool to verify that therefore that kind of "evidence" is not valid to begin with

Mao diay nay Concept sa Science if way tool maka quantify or verify Dili Valid?

So since ang Science Wala may TOOL para maka Determine EXACTLY Where and When Earthquake will start, Means Ang pag abot sa earthquake Dili Valid? So Limitation sa Earthquake kay ang Science way tool?

So sa year 1500 hundred, since wala pa may TOOL to Quantify the Element Oxygen - Meaning Dili Valid ang Oxygen atu nga time? So based atu na TIME dili FACT ang oxygen kay di man or wala may TOOL para ma Quantify?

[porbidaman]

Ay na bahala ka ug d ka motoo. If its Good for you not to believe imuha na.
Kanus a lang na diskobre nga ang earth lingin? Ang bahin sa fingerprints?
Sa biblia dugai na nasuwat.

Unsa mai d nimu tuhuan? Ang Ang Ginoo sa Biblia nag sulti; ayaw pangawat, ayaw pangabit, ayaw pagpatay. Kung d ka mo too niya it means nga pwidi raka mubuhat ani.

Pero imuha sad na mego. Lainlain man ta ug panglantaw sa unahan.

Pero mao pod ni akoa e ingon nimu dili tanang religion tinuod, naai uban ginigusyo,

2 Corinthians 2:17
Unlike so many, we do not peddle the word of God for profit. On the contrary, in Christ we speak before God with sincerity, as those sent from God.

Naa pod uban dili sugo sa Ginoo kundi Sugo sa Tao.

Mar 7:7-8
7 Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. 8 For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups:and many other such like things ye do.

Nasuwat diay sa bible migo nga lingin ang kalibutan? di ba flat man ilang gito-ohan? what about sa fingerprints migo nga kita tanan lahi-lahi man jud ug fingerprints?

[SioDenz]

Hahay, likay napud ka Siodz, asa imo ebidensya? Spirit diay? dats wild imagination Siodz aka DELUSION Hehehehe...

maayu lang ta ani ug adlib nya pangutan on sa iyang Bases di na mutubag..

Balikon nko ha..

If ang imung Criteria sa FACT is Hear, See, and Touch.. maka Qualify ba as FACT ang Big bang Theory nimu?

[chimcham]

depende ra na sa imong faith..

[pakinimo]

Mao diay nay Concept sa Science if way tool maka quantify or verify Dili Valid?

So since ang Science Wala may TOOL para maka Determine EXACTLY Where and When Earthquake will start, Means Ang pag abot sa earthquake Dili Valid? So Limitation sa Earthquake kay ang Science way tool?

So sa year 1500 hundred, since wala pa may TOOL to Quantify the Element Oxygen - Meaning Dili Valid ang Oxygen atu nga time? So based atu na TIME dili FACT ang oxygen kay di man or wala may TOOL para ma Quantify?

hehehe wa ka kasabot sio. Kung imong evidence dli ma verify through science dli na valid.

Ang earthquake dli ma predict pero ma verify na and evident kaau na nga nag exist using seismometers.

It doesnt have to be quantified to be verifiable. Evidence can be present but not yet measurable.

[porbidaman]

maayu lang ta ani ug adlib nya pangutan on sa iyang Bases di na mutubag..

Balikon nko ha..

If ang imung Criteria sa FACT is Hear, See, and Touch.. maka Qualify ba as FACT ang Big bang Theory nimu?

What a STUPID question? ay naku ebidensya diay nimo kai espiritu, ang makatubag ra jud ana siodz kai psychiatrist

[Weiland]

Hehe. Kana, wa na jud thread nga in-ani sa istorya. Bitaw mga bai, let's keep this thread healthy lng.

Are you also open to the idea nga walay ginoo?

[emailroy2002]

I'm a faithful but just asking..

Can lawyers become lawyers without praying?
Can doctors become doctors without praying?
Can nurses and other professions be acheived without prayers?
Can prayers bring the sun and not rain when prayed for?

balik ta sa imong question..

all professionals can be successful without even praying bro, they use science and had work hard to achieve it... reading the bible is not essential tool to be a successful professional.


prayers can't bring sun, rain, or anything... you are not Mosses, biblical scriptures said he only did it once...(but not sure if he did it secretly at home)

[Weiland]

You don't need religion to achieve anything.