End of the world THEORY

[Archer912]

---

Nice info..

[dc_sigbin]

naa pod diay mga scientists aning istorya.. hehe.. nindot ni na topic, nice observations, atleast naay basis through theories etc.. mao ni scientific thinking , unlike uban topics diha na puros imaginary thinking

[unswa]

Ang scientitst ani nga theory brader gi ban kay weirdo kuno ug pangutok.So ayaw namo pag scientist2x aron dili ma ban. Be dramatic and emotional nalang ta ani.

[vern]

You realize that we have a pretty good understanding of gravity right? This has never happened in the past and will never happen in the future. At least not the way you theorize. Math sure is swell.

[unswa]

You realize that we have a pretty good understanding of gravity right? This has never happened in the past and will never happen in the future. At least not the way you theorize. Math sure is swell.

The question is: Do our scientist really know what transpires 65B years ago? They can't even put a real answer what happened to the dinosaurs. And even today with our "modern" technology, we didn't even know 95% of the ocean and its depths.

It could be that 65B years ago, Earth's distance to the sun is not the same today. Maybe life starts to flourish when there is a balance between heat and cold - distance could be the factor.

It is a theory nevertheless but I strongly believe the distance between earth and sun started life.

[Zeit Geist]

This wont happen, in fact as time goes by people will evolve and also planets or even everything. Humans are not the only one who has a life even the planets has his own life force. Nikolai Kardashev has his own theories of this , The Kardashev Scale defined three levels of civilizations, based on the order of magnitude of power available to them. Its inevitable that as time pass by we can control the powers we have on our planet as well on our solar system.

[vern]

The question is: Do our scientist really know what transpires 65B years ago? They can't even put a real answer what happened to the dinosaurs. And even today with our "modern" technology, we didn't even know 95% of the ocean and its depths.

It could be that 65B years ago, Earth's distance to the sun is not the same today. Maybe life starts to flourish when there is a balance between heat and cold - distance could be the factor.

It is a theory nevertheless but I strongly believe the distance between earth and sun started life.

Seriously? The universe we are in did not exist 65 billion years ago. Our planet's orbit can be calculated to billions of years ago. That is how math works. That is how equations work. We can essentially roll back time by looking at Earth's or any other planet's orbit today and calculating what it was in the past. You are under the assumption that we know less than we do. None of the things that have been stated is a mystery. It has nothing but "what ifs". No math. No science. We don't know about most of the Earth's oceans because not everything has been discovered. The theory on gravity has existed for hundreds of years. Of course the distance between the Earth and Sun started life. No one here came up with that. They even have a name for it ... it's called the Goldilocks Zone. But this theory with all this orbit migration mumbo jumbo has no basis. It isn't even a theory when you have no calculations to back it up.

[unswa]

Seriously? The universe we are in did not exist 65 billion years ago. Our planet's orbit can be calculated to billions of years ago. That is how math works. That is how equations work. We can essentially roll back time by looking at Earth's or any other planet's orbit today and calculating what it was in the past. You are under the assumption that we know less than we do. None of the things that have been stated is a mystery. It has nothing but "what ifs". No math. No science. We don't know about most of the Earth's oceans because not everything has been discovered. The theory on gravity has existed for hundreds of years. Of course the distance between the Earth and Sun started life. No one here came up with that. They even have a name for it ... it's called the Goldilocks Zone. But this theory with all this orbit migration mumbo jumbo has no basis. It isn't even a theory when you have no calculations to back it up.

So Theory of Evolution isn't a theory since there's no mathematical calculations involved in it.

[vern]

So Theory of Evolution isn't a theory since there's no mathematical calculations involved in it.

The theory of evolution has observation and countless research in archaeology, biology, geology, climatology among others behind it. The weight of science is behind evolution. What does this theory have? All it needs is already known mathematics to have any weight. It doesn't have that.

[carmicael]

For your assertion to be a valid scientific theory similar to evolution, it must have well-substantiated evidence to support it. It should be able to explain something using the scientific method. It must be capable of repetitive testing and must be able to make accurate predictions. Does your assertion have these characteristics? Care to elaborate?

Discrediting the theory and nature of gravity is something that can shake the scientific community. The theory of gravity is pretty well understood by now. If your idea is in fact a theory and not just a plain assertion, gather evidence, perform testing, and present it in a scientific journal and claim your nobel prize.