The Roman Catholic Church~ Questions

[NapoleonBlownapart]

---

Again, Dili ta mu assume na naa jud "Jesus Christ" na gi crucify, kay walay written documents from the romans na naay gi crucify na "Jesus Christ"

Unsay wala nga naa man mga record nila ni Tacitus.. LOL

[R.Forster]

Unsay wala nga naa man mga record nila ni Tacitus.. LOL

Kapila na ko cgeg balik balik ani, dili gihapon na reliable nang mga documents ni tacitus because evidence suggest that there is a big possibilty that it has been forged throughout the centuries, for example the one who "discovered" the Annals of Tacitus was a man named Poggio Bracciolini who worked as a "writer" and a "scholar" for the pope during the Middle Ages.

[R.Forster]

O SioDenz asa na imung reply ani? ayaw ug cgeg tago tago diha. NGA NGA?

Grammar Police


The Proof of Jesus is Not only Based on Document.

The Proof of the Reference of Jesus are based from the Research of Archeologist Not Priest or Pastors. The Findings are already published in some Well respected scientific community and media Outfit. so WRONG again..

sample:

A team of scientists led by renowned French marine archaeologist Franck Goddio recently announced that they have found a bowl, dating to between the late 2nd century B.C. and the early 1st century A.D., that is engraved with what they believe could be the world's first known reference to Christ. ...
-Discovery News published in NBCNEWS website..

Here's another Publication from Institute of Creation Research:
...
The new artifact is an ossuary, a medium-sized box in which human bones were placed for permanent burial after the flesh had all decayed away. This practice was employed for only a brief period of time from about B.C. 20 to A.D. 70. The box is made of a soft, chalky, limestone, common to the area. The contents have long since vanished.

Most remarkably, an inscription has been etched into the side which reads, "James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus" in the Aramaic script of the time. Careful studies, including scrutiny under a scanning electron microscope show the inscription to be genuine. The patina, or oxidized surface equally covers both box and the interior of the etched letters. The recognized expert on such matters, Dr. Andre Lemaire, concludes: "I am pleased to report that in my judgment it is genuinely ancient and not a fake."
...

If Coming from People with PHD and Archeologist - i dont think you are Qualified to say "Its unverified and possibly tampered"

- - - Updated - - -



See Sample Above...

Those data came from People with PHD and Published in Some Biggest name in Media Industry. The Evidence came from PEOPLE in Scientific Community. And they are NOT only documents, They Have ARTIFACTS..

We let the Scientific Community Break it down to you...

Dili gihapon na irrefutable evidence nang gipang post nimo, like the bowl:

While not discounting the Jesus Christ interpretation, other researchers have offered different possible interpretations for the engraving, which was made on the thin-walled ceramic bowl after it was fired, since slip was removed during the process.

Bert Smith, a professor of classical archaeology and art at Oxford University, suggests the engraving might be a dedication, or present, made by a certain "Chrestos" belonging to a possible religious association called Ogoistais.

Klaus Hallof, director of the Institute of Greek inscriptions at the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy, added that if Smith's interpretation proves valid, the word "Ogoistais" could then be connected to known religious groups that worshipped early Greek and Egyptian gods and goddesses, such as Hermes, Athena and Isis.

Nga Nga gihapon ka?

And dugay na kabalo ang scientifc community na gi peke ra tong "James Ossuary" which contained the words ""James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus""

Authenticity of the inscription has been challenged. The Israeli Antiquities Authority (IAA) determined in 2003 that the inscriptions were forged at a much later date. In December 2004, Oded Golan was charged with 44 counts of forgery, fraud and deception, including forgery of the Ossuary inscription.

Nga Nga gihapon?

Gi gamit pa ninyo ang pangalan sa Scientific Community sa inyung mga kamangmangan.

[SioDenz]

O SioDenz asa na imung reply ani? ayaw ug cgeg tago tago diha. NGA NGA?

Dili gihapon na irrefutable evidence nang gipang post nimo, like the bowl:

basaha daw ni unsa nsay imung ikasulti?

Evidence For Jesus

But we already know unsa imu reply - TAMPERED..

Cge kag hisgot ug irrefutable evidence - Pero the evidence nga imung Gipang hambog imu rang gibasa sa Buhat sa ubang tawo nga wa gani ka nabuhat imung verification..

[NapoleonBlownapart]

Kapila na ko cgeg balik balik ani, dili gihapon na reliable nang mga documents ni tacitus because evidence suggest that there is a big possibilty that it has been forged throughout the centuries, for example the one who "discovered" the Annals of Tacitus was a man named Poggio Bracciolini who worked as a "writer" and a "scholar" for the pope during the Middle Ages.

Nya asa man nang evidence nimo? ipakita na.. puro ra man na laway imo lage.. evidence suggest evidence suggest nya wa d.i toy ebidensya.. Ngano d.i ug sya ang nakadiscover? tampered d.i dayon.. kana imoha lagi "possibility".. speculation ra jud na.. abi nako ug "fact" ra imo tuhoan.. basin tinood ug fact na para nimo kay basta pabor sa imong belief fact na tingali na nimo

[R.Forster]

basaha daw ni unsa nsay imung ikasulti?

Evidence For Jesus

But we already know unsa imu reply - TAMPERED..

Cge kag hisgot ug irrefutable evidence - Pero the evidence nga imung Gipang hambog imu rang gibasa sa Buhat sa ubang tawo nga wa gani ka nabuhat imung verification..

Laughing out loud at the website:

Many people refer to us as “Christians,” but we consider ourselves followers of Jesus.

http://www.allaboutarchaeology.org/common/aboutus.htm

Again balik ta sa "James Ossuary" gi kasuhan ang nag forge ato so dili ni theory lang but a fact na gi peke ang imung ginapanghambog na "James Ossuary"

Ikaw ra ang nanghambog unya post post dayun ug "James Ossuary" as an evidence for christ, unya gi counteran tika na gi kasuhan ang naka discover ato kay gi forge ang nakasulat na "James, The Brother of Jesus, Son of Josph" asa na imung rebuttal ani?

Golan had taken a genuine but common ossuary inscribed with the words “James, son of Joseph,” and added the words “brother of Jesus,” turning it into a find of global importance and vast worth. Then, according to the charge, he manufactured a fake patina — the thin film of grime that typically accumulates over centuries — and applied it to the new inscription to make it seem ancient.

Nga Nga gihapon?



- - - Updated - - -

Nya asa man nang evidence nimo? ipakita na.. puro ra man na laway imo lage.. evidence suggest evidence suggest nya wa d.i toy ebidensya.. Ngano d.i ug sya ang nakadiscover? tampered d.i dayon.. kana imoha lagi "possibility".. speculation ra jud na.. abi nako ug "fact" ra imo tuhoan..

Fact ra jud akong tuohan, karon kay dili mana fact nang mga ebidensiya ninyo na naay Jesus Christ, aw dili jud ko mu tuo ana.

Pariha anang "James Ossuary" o gi peke ra diay.

[NapoleonBlownapart]

Fact ra jud akong tuohan, karon kay dili mana fact nang mga ebidensiya ninyo na naay Jesus Christ, aw dili jud ko mu tuo ana.

Pariha anang "James Ossuary" o gi peke ra diay.

Asa man imong ebidensya nga gi tampered? speculation ra man na.. ngano motuo ka ana? hahaha

[R.Forster]

Dili lang ang "James Ossuary" ang peke, pati nasad ang shroud of turin na gi basehan sa mga katoliko sa nawong ni "Jesus Christ" daw kuno.

After years of discussion, the Holy See permitted radiocarbon dating on portions of a swatch taken from a corner of the shroud. Independent tests in 1988 at the University of Oxford, the University of Arizona, and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology concluded with 95% confidence that the shroud material dated to 1260–1390 AD.p

NGA NGA NAPUD?

[battouter]

metal kaayo si jeesus, part. bungot og long hair pay imo ay... wa koy blema ni jeesus.

[NapoleonBlownapart]

Dili lang ang "James Ossuary" ang peke, pati nasad ang shroud of turin na gi basehan sa mga katoliko sa nawong ni "Jesus Christ" daw kuno.





NGA NGA NAPUD?

Isda.. isda mo diha