ako question nimo is this. the issue on hand where natagak ang bata sa SM, did this really happen? or is this just a simple theoritical arguement?
if this is the latter, then i would expect silly replies from people who find gratification in oral arguements.
i, on the other hand, am talking about what's real, not some silly line of reasoning or following this logic or some other similar rubbish.
so in essence, you're telling everyone that kani mga posts sa istorya.net kay bugal2x ra tanan? that tanan arguements theoritical lang & things really didin't happen?
sure oi
panganak sa, niya badlonga dayon ang bata nga nagkiat. pugngi kuno ang bata magkiat. tanawn nato.






Reply With Quote
