only a parent will know the feeling so if wala ka ma-igo, then chances are, you're not a parent, hence mura wala lang sa imo. and if you read my post on page 10 on this thread, i said naa pagkuwang ang parents but somewhat nalain ko because there were people who put the majority of the blame sa parents.
Most people here nga mo blame sa parents kai 100% walai anak! Agree??
Have you seen the news lately about the boy? Gi gastohan na sa SM ang tanan expenses nga niabot daw og P200K+. If that's the case, ang SM ni angkon na sa liability sa nahitabo kai kung mo blame pa sila sa parents, mag huwat ni sila pasakahan og kaso. Ka dako na anang kantidad nga kwarta nya dghan pa na follow up medications, etc. This just means naa jui lapses ang SM. Kita parents we will do our best bya to protect our kids pero its not in our hands na if ang environment mismo puts a danger to your child.
Igo lang jud ang mga pride.... Pasagdan man gud ang bata
Naa man gud sa SM nahitabo sa gastohan jud na nila
[QUOTE=Little_Mermaid88;16345240]
If you can't say anything good, don't say anything at all. Just because you can, doesn't mean you have to.
Your contribution to this thread is INSENSITIVE at best.
You never had a kid that you took care of since day 1, so if we parents need a credible advice, it wouldn't be from you.
Your blame statement a.k.a. "advice" is needles madam.
excuse meh!! kung sa ako nahitabo na, I DONT need SM to support me financially ako pa hinuon na isagpa sa ilang nawng ang kwarta kung gasto ra ila panagutan. Of course I will demand jud for an investigation from the supplier sa glass to the contractor to the engineer of SM para wa nai ma biktima sunod.. You're such a pathetic creature. Mura lang ka nilabay ani nga thread para makisawsaw and say something not nice.
Its a good gesture by sm. A negative public opinion is very costly for a business. However, it was a preventable accident if there was a more active supervision by the parents or the guardian at that time. Of course one may argue that sm shouldve provided a more durable protection for its shoppers. For the last 20 years, this is the first incdent for that particular scenario, and i am quite sure SM will take swift action to review its facilities... it was an unfortunate accident, but everything seems to be taken care of. Suing SM is unnecessary...
say what?! dios ko miyo! it's clear as day you're not a parent. if naa naka anak, niya naa mahitabo niya, only God can stop you from doing anything for your child.
these kinds of comments are hollow & mostly based on what you think is correct. but for us nga parents na, with hard earned experience & knowledge, kataw-anan kaayo ni.
mark my words, when you become parents yourself & you will know exactly how it feels to be in our shoes right now then ma-realize pud ninyo nga dili sayon, when you remember this topic at that point in your life, maka-ingon jud mo, winay buot jud to ako gisulti sa kani nga thread.
main point lang ani, don't make any negative statement on the parents of this child if wala mo inyo kaugalingon anak coz wala mo kabalo how it feels being a parent.
I share @emow's points. You people should be enough on who's to blame. Did you hear or read any statements from the parents that SM and management are solely the ones to blame? I bet you will never ever hear it. Yet some are suggesting here that parents should file a lawsuit. That's impractical because both parties, parents and SM, share 100% negligence for this accident.
Similar Threads |
|