For Christians(Apostle Paul Believers): Paul, the False Apostle, Ravenous Wolf Prophecy - Ngano nagpauto man mo niya??

[Aittv]

---

waa ngega? ngano naka ingon man ka nga amo ni gi test like history book?

kung gamiton nmo ang common logic na pareha sa isa ka tao -> kunyare kay Saul/Paul ug ang Apostles -> ang i conclude dayon sa isa ka tao kay legit si Paul -> pero kung tanawon ang gospel ni Paul vs sa Apostles -> daghan mga contradiction -> dapat tanawon nimo tanan sides of possibilities kay gagamit ug double meaning ang bible -> unlike kanang history malink nimo ang istorya with minimal errors kay dili complicated ang words.

kuyawa nimo oi...mga muslims ok ra mo ani? wala koy idea about other belief pro dili ko manghilabot nila..
pakit-a kuno kog verse nga nag sulti nga ma empyerno na silaklaro kaayo ni nag buot nasad ka ani

baliktad infavor nuon ko sa ila - basaha usab akong post.

naa nasad ka aning imong kulto pakit-a kog verse...nanaway kang PABLO unya ikaw mag buot2x rasad kag imo...kita kas kas kausaban ni pablo? iyang testemonya kung unsa siya kaniadto hangtud nahimong ministro ni Jesus? unsa man tawag ato dili repentance? ang problema nimo, imbis si Pablo nag sulti sa tibuok kamatuoran, imo na no0n gihimong dautan..diba sa korte ang witness will "Telling all the truth and nothing but the truth" mao nay tinuod nga saksi..walay gitago nga bakak para mailhan huwes kung nagsulti ba ang testisgo sa matuaod

Sorry pero dili ko maliba ana kay before pa nahitabo ang conversion ni Paul nagsulti na si Jesus about unforgivable sin - which Saul did. Kung nagbago si Saul/Paul d nacontradict ang gisulti ni Jesus. Jesus does not lie.

kung ignorante lang ang tawo unya dili himasa sa biblia ma gyud nay paignan ayaw mig dad-a ngadto pagka alaot amaw. kinsa ka nga mogiya kanamo? utro sad kang buta...naghimo- himo baya tuod imong dalan

Matthew 15:14
14 Leave them; they are blind guides.[d] If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit.”

unsa diay tanaw nimo ana literal na gate? Unsa interpretation nimo ana? -pakitai daw ko

and what are those commandments of God ang imong nahibaw-an...isaysay ngari...simpol ra gyud na kaayo


that the reason why we resist your demonic statement here because you are the devil...if you are not then prove me

If I am a devil then I would not waste my time spreading this gospel - the truth.

unsa man to si PABLO wala magpaubos? ug kani imong for asa ni nato mabasa sa biblia? usa ka tawo ra akong nailang ang nigamit ani nga Teaching si Quibuloy unsa man ka? sakop ka niya or ikaw na mismo si Quibuloy

It was hypocrisy. Basaha tong tanan contradiction - mahibalan nagbago si Paul - nagbago iyang strategy.

so far wala pa koy nakita nga ang teaching ni PAUL makadaot...ang akong nakita nga makadaot kani imong gipang yawit..kung tan-aw nimo sayop ko sige PROVE IT HERE!!!

Culto kang dako!!!

I already posted the justification by works(true Apostles) vs works does not justify anyone(Paul). Few words but Pauls doctrine will lead you to hell.

[slabdans]

kung gamiton nmo ang common logic na pareha sa isa ka tao -> kunyare kay Saul/Paul ug ang Apostles -> ang i conclude dayon sa isa ka tao kay legit si Paul -> pero kung tanawon ang gospel ni Paul vs sa Apostles -> daghan mga contradiction -> dapat tanawon nimo tanan sides of possibilities kay gagamit ug double meaning ang bible -> unlike kanang history malink nimo ang istorya with minimal errors kay dili complicated ang words.

unsa may naka contradict sa iyang teaching nga tanan padong man Gihapon sa pagka savior ni Jesus...wala man na siya mag proclaim nga siya sakto..kundi dili si Jesus maoy sakto mao na iya gipang ministry...ang imong Gitan-aw nga errors katong iyang history or testimony kung unsa siya kani-adto..pero wala nimo tan-awa kung gi unsa siya pag-usab sa Dios ug nahimong nga usa ka alagad ni Jesus...si Jesus mismo ang nipili niya ha take note

proverb 3:5

5 Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.

diha nato husayon pina-agi sa biblia

baliktad infavor nuon ko sa ila - basaha usab akong post.

Sorry pero dili ko maliba ana kay before pa nahitabo ang conversion ni Paul nagsulti na si Jesus about unforgivable sin - which Saul did. Kung nagbago si Saul/Paul d nacontradict ang gisulti ni Jesus. Jesus does not lie.

unsa diay tanaw nimo ana literal na gate? Unsa interpretation nimo ana? -pakitai daw ko

If I am a devil then I would not waste my time spreading this gospel - the truth.


It was hypocrisy. Basaha tong tanan contradiction - mahibalan nagbago si Paul - nagbago iyang strategy.

I already posted the justification by works(true Apostles) vs works does not justify anyone(Paul). Few words but Pauls doctrine will lead you to hell.

ipakita kung unsa ang verse...nagpalipat nasad ka..wala tay padongan ani kung puros lang kaugalingon nato nga pagsabot.

[Aittv]

unsa may naka contradict sa iyang teaching nga tanan padong man Gihapon sa pagka savior ni Jesus...wala man na siya mag proclaim nga siya sakto..kundi dili si Jesus maoy sakto mao na iya gipang ministry...ang imong Gitan-aw nga errors katong iyang history or testimony kung unsa siya kani-adto..pero wala nimo tan-awa kung gi unsa siya pag-usab sa Dios ug nahimong nga usa ka alagad ni Jesus...si Jesus mismo ang nipili niya ha take note

Dire ka nagkamalit kung mutuo ka dayon na nagbago na si Paul/Saul. Dapat testingan dyod nimo kung tinood iyang ginasulti - words can be deceptive. Tanawa unsa sya kabakakon:

Acts 9: 7
7 And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man

-So as we can see, Acts verse 7 says that the men who accompanied Paul heard a voice, but saw no man, they saw nobody.

vs
Acts 22 : 9
9 And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me.

-So now as you can see, in Acts 22 Paul says the man saw a light, but heard no voice! In Acts 9 Paul says the men so no man, but heard a voice!

-Lying failed.

Naa pa:
Acts 9 3-7
3 And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven: 4 And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? 5 And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. 6 And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do. 7 And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man

-So few things to note, Paul is on a journey, he then sees a light and hears a voice, this voice is supposedly Jesus. Paul then asks Jesus what do you want me to do? The response by Jesus is for Paul to go to the city and it will be made known to him over there. Now lets read whats Acts 26: 15-18:

15 And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest. 16 But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee; 17 Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee, 18 To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me

-So note the difference, in the first account all Jesus tells him is go to the city to find out what you must do, in this account in Acts 22 we see Jesus already telling Paul what he meant to do! So which one is it? Will Paul know what his purpose is in the city? Or did he already know?

Dli ba ni sya liar? klaro na kaayo ni ha - syaro.

proverb 3:5
5 Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.

This is my past mistake.

diha nato husayon pina-agi sa biblia

ipakita kung unsa ang verse...nagpalipat nasad ka..wala tay padongan ani kung puros lang kaugalingon nato nga pagsabot.

ipost nako sunod kay taas na kaayo

[slabdans]

Acts 9: 7[/SIZE]
7 And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man

-So as we can see, Acts verse 7 says that the men who accompanied Paul heard a voice, but saw no man, they saw nobody.

tan-awa ra gud na imong pagka toytoy...unsa may tan-aw nimo ni Jesus ana nga Time? tawo? Dios na intawn siya diha oi..siya ra ang gipakita ni Jesus ana nga time

tan-awa ang acts 9: 6

6 And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do.

acts9:8

8 And Saul arose from the earth; and when his eyes were opened, he saw no man: but they led him by the hand, and brought him into Damascus.

tan-awa ang word arise and arouse natural wala siyay makita when his eyes were opened..asa man ka mangita ug buta nga makakita? ang mga tawo nga imong gipang mention sa verse 7 literal nga tawo (ug natural nga kanang mga tawhana dili makakita ug maka dungog sa Dios)...travelers nga maoy nagtabang ni paul

vs
Acts 22 : 9
9 And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me.

[SIZE=2]-So now as you can see, in Acts 22 Paul says the man saw a light, but heard no voice! In Acts 9 Paul says the men so no man, but heard a voice!

-Lying failed.

Acts 22:9

9 Now those who were with me saw the light but did not understand[c] the voice of the one who was speaking to me.

sa ako ng gisulti Dios na Jesus ana nga time...tan-awa ha..the word those who where with me kato tawon ng mga tawo nga iyang kuyog pag adto sa Damascus para e persecute ang mga opostoles...managlahi tong mga tawo nga nitabang niya sa ACTS 9:8 mga travelers to sila

and this frove that you are the liar here

Naa pa:
Acts 9 3-7
3 And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven: 4 And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? 5 And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. 6 And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do. 7 And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man

-So few things to note, Paul is on a journey, he then sees a light and hears a voice, this voice is supposedly Jesus. Paul then asks Jesus what do you want me to do? The response by Jesus is for Paul to go to the city and it will be made known to him over there. Now lets read whats Acts 26: 15-18:

15 And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest. 16 But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee; 17 Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee, 18 To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me

-So note the difference, in the first account all Jesus tells him is go to the city to find out what you must do, in this account in Acts 22 we see Jesus already telling Paul what he meant to do! So which one is it? Will Paul know what his purpose is in the city? Or did he already know?

Dli ba ni sya liar? klaro na kaayo ni ha - syaro.

This is my past mistake.

ipost nako sunod kay taas na kaayo

tan-awa ha para makasabot ka

Acts 9:11-16

10 Now there was a disciple at Damascus named Ananias. The Lord said to him in a vision, “Ananias.” And he said, “Here I am, Lord.”

11 And the Lord said to him, “Rise and go to the street called Straight, and at the house of Judas look for a man of Tarsus named Saul, for behold, he is praying,

12 and he has seen in a vision a man named Ananias come in and lay his hands on him so that he might regain his sight.” (si pablo ang gihisgutan ani)

13 But Ananias answered, “Lord, I have heard from many about this man, how much evil he has done to your saints at Jerusalem.

14 And here he has authority from the chief priests to bind all who call on your name.”

15 But the Lord said to him, “Go, for he is a chosen instrument of mine to carry my name before the Gentiles and kings and the children of Israel.

tan-awa ug maayo

acts 9:10 The Lord said to him in a vision

acts 9:11 -gisugo si Ananias sa Dios Rise and go to the street called Straight, and at the house of Judas look for a man of Tarsus named Saul

acts 9:12 12 and he has seen in a vision a man named Ananias come in and lay his hands on him so that he might regain his sight.”

sa verse 12 si paul na gihisgutan diha, unsa ang vision ang gipasabot? "damgo na" si Ananias nakakita kang Pablo pinaagi sa damgo ug si Pablo usab naka kita kang Ananias pina agi lang sa damgo, para pagpamatuod nga kana nga vision damgo..naa ang word RISE

acts 9:13-14 -nibalibad paman gani si Ananias tungod sa ka hanggaw aning Pablo pero sa

acts 9:15 Go, for he is a chosen instrument of mine to carry my name

gi insist gyud na mismo sa Dios

pagka sukwahi nalang gyud sa imong pagtuo nga kina palanado na daan ni Paul

[Aittv]

tan-awa ra gud na imong pagka toytoy...unsa may tan-aw nimo ni Jesus ana nga Time? tawo? Dios na intawn siya diha oi..siya ra ang gipakita ni Jesus ana nga time

Ang problema ani Jesus already warned the apostles na dili na sya magpakita hantod sa iyang second coming. Tapos kalit nalang magpakita kay Saul/Paul - who made an unforgivable sin?

Matthew 24: 23-27
23 At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or, ‘There he is!’ do not believe it. 24 For false messiahs and false prophets/teachers will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. 25 See, I have told you ahead of time.

26 “So if anyone tells you, ‘There he is, out in the wilderness,’ do not go out; or, ‘Here he is, in the inner rooms,’ do not believe it. 27 For as lightning that comes from the east is visible even in the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man.

tan-awa ang acts 9: 6

6 And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do.

acts9:8

8 And Saul arose from the earth; and when his eyes were opened, he saw no man: but they led him by the hand, and brought him into Damascus.

tan-awa ang word arise and arouse natural wala siyay makita when his eyes were opened..asa man ka mangita ug buta nga makakita? ang mga tawo nga imong gipang mention sa verse 7 literal nga tawo (ug natural nga kanang mga tawhana dili makakita ug maka dungog sa Dios)...travelers nga maoy nagtabang ni paul


Acts 22:9

9 Now those who were with me saw the light but did not understand[c] the voice of the one who was speaking to me.

sa ako ng gisulti Dios na Jesus ana nga time...tan-awa ha..the word those who where with me kato tawon ng mga tawo nga iyang kuyog pag adto sa Damascus para e persecute ang mga opostoles...managlahi tong mga tawo nga nitabang niya sa ACTS 9:8 mga travelers to sila

and this frove that you are the liar here

Okay - malamang mali ko or mali ka depende sa translation.

tan-awa ha para makasabot ka

Acts 9:11-16

10 Now there was a disciple at Damascus named Ananias. The Lord said to him in a vision, “Ananias.” And he said, “Here I am, Lord.”

11 And the Lord said to him, “Rise and go to the street called Straight, and at the house of Judas look for a man of Tarsus named Saul, for behold, he is praying,

12 and he has seen in a vision a man named Ananias come in and lay his hands on him so that he might regain his sight.” (si pablo ang gihisgutan ani)

13 But Ananias answered, “Lord, I have heard from many about this man, how much evil he has done to your saints at Jerusalem.

14 And here he has authority from the chief priests to bind all who call on your name.”

15 But the Lord said to him, “Go, for he is a chosen instrument of mine to carry my name before the Gentiles and kings and the children of Israel.

tan-awa ug maayo

acts 9:10 The Lord said to him in a vision

acts 9:11 -gisugo si Ananias sa Dios Rise and go to the street called Straight, and at the house of Judas look for a man of Tarsus named Saul

acts 9:12 12 and he has seen in a vision a man named Ananias come in and lay his hands on him so that he might regain his sight.”

sa verse 12 si paul na gihisgutan diha, unsa ang vision ang gipasabot? "damgo na" si Ananias nakakita kang Pablo pinaagi sa damgo ug si Pablo usab naka kita kang Ananias pina agi lang sa damgo, para pagpamatuod nga kana nga vision damgo..naa ang word RISE

acts 9:13-14 -nibalibad paman gani si Ananias tungod sa ka hanggaw aning Pablo pero sa

acts 9:15 Go, for he is a chosen instrument of mine to carry my name

gi insist gyud na mismo sa Dios

pagka sukwahi nalang gyud sa imong pagtuo nga kina palanado na daan ni Paul

Cge tama ka dire but I have questions:
Does Jesus blind people - I did not see this in his miracles - is blinding people Holy?
Why would Jesus forgive Saul/Paul a blasphemer of the Holy Spirit - and make him an instrument for the Gentiles?
How did Saul/Paul carry Jesus name when he is preaching a contradictory doctrine from Jesus?

[slabdans]

@Aittv ugma lang ko buntag reply ani ha kay 12midnight na..11ra ako curfew baya naa paka time para ma edit nimo ni hehehe pagka dalia ra gihapon ni lutsan..sa book of matthew lang gihapon paksit ka hehehe

Ang problema ani Jesus already warned the apostles na dili na sya magpakita hantod sa iyang second coming. Tapos kalit nalang magpakita kay Saul/Paul - who made an unforgivable sin?

Matthew 24: 23-27
23 At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or, ‘There he is!’ do not believe it. 24 For false messiahs and false prophets/teachers will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. 25 See, I have told you ahead of time.

26 “So if anyone tells you, ‘There he is, out in the wilderness,’ do not go out; or, ‘Here he is, in the inner rooms,’ do not believe it. 27 For as lightning that comes from the east is visible even in the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man.

Okay - malamang mali ko or mali ka depende sa translation.

Cge tama ka dire but I have questions:
Does Jesus blind people - I did not see this in his miracles - is blinding people Holy?
Why would Jesus forgive Saul/Paul a blasphemer of the Holy Spirit - and make him an instrument for the Gentiles?
How did Saul/Paul carry Jesus name when he is preaching a contradictory doctrine from Jesus?

[H.Wolowitz]

ot: hehe basta in.ani nga mga thread kay usa ra jd ang padulngan - CLOSED

[WengIA]

bai TS. tan-awon sa nato ang sitwayon ha.. ang 12 ka apotoles nga nakawitness jud sa pagkayab ni Christ direkta to sila nga disples ni christ meaning direkta silang naka learn diha sa pagtulon-an ni Cristo og gisugo nga ispread ang Good News. og karon tan-awa ang sitwasyon ni Paul. Si Paul gitawag sa will sa Ginoo. klaro kaayo ng He is a Chosen instrument of mine (Jesus) to carry my name.. karon tan-awon nato dili direktang naka learn si Paul diha kang Cristo tungod kay wala na si Christ physically sa dihang na convert sya into Christianity. So meaning kinahanglan mag rely si Paul sa iyang knowledge inubanan sa Giya sa Pangalan ni Cristo cuz wala siya direkta naka Learn kang Christ.unya mangutana ka nganong si Paul Gipili sa Ginoo nga instrumento para sa iyang Pangalan? bright kaayo ang Ginoo TS. kahibalo ang Ginoo kung unsa ka banggiitang tao Si Pablo nga kaya niyang irely ang iyang kaalam para sa kahimayaan sa Pangalan ni Cristo tungod kay dili sya direkta nga disciiple ni Cristo Unya karon unsay gi expect nimo kang Paul? nga magkaparehas sila og pagtulon-an gayod sa mga apostoles?mangita kag proweba? girebuke niya si Apostle Peter diba? For God's sake dili jud na magkaparehas. pero ang unod TS sa pagtulon-an si Kristo ang gipatigbabaw. Hinumdomi TS nga dako kaayog kalambigitan si Paul sa Apostolic Ages. siya ang gitawag nga Apostle of Gentiles ..mangutana ka ngano? tungod kay siya ang naay dakong katakos nga makapakalat sa Pagtulon-an ni Kristo diha sa mga Gentiles sama nato.

[Aittv]

bai TS. tan-awon sa nato ang sitwayon ha.. ang 12 ka apotoles nga nakawitness jud sa pagkayab ni Christ direkta to sila nga disples ni christ meaning direkta silang naka learn diha sa pagtulon-an ni Cristo og gisugo nga ispread ang Good News. og karon tan-awa ang sitwasyon ni Paul. Si Paul gitawag sa will sa Ginoo. klaro kaayo ng He is a Chosen instrument of mine (Jesus) to carry my name.. karon tan-awon nato dili direktang naka learn si Paul diha kang Cristo tungod kay wala na si Christ physically sa dihang na convert sya into Christianity. So meaning kinahanglan mag rely si Paul sa iyang knowledge inubanan sa Giya sa Pangalan ni Cristo cuz wala siya direkta naka Learn kang Christ.unya mangutana ka nganong si Paul Gipili sa Ginoo nga instrumento para sa iyang Pangalan? bright kaayo ang Ginoo TS. kahibalo ang Ginoo kung unsa ka banggiitang tao Si Pablo nga kaya niyang irely ang iyang kaalam para sa kahimayaan sa Pangalan ni Cristo tungod kay dili sya direkta nga disciiple ni Cristo Unya karon unsay gi expect nimo kang Paul? nga magkaparehas sila og pagtulon-an gayod sa mga apostoles?mangita kag proweba? girebuke niya si Apostle Peter diba? For God's sake dili jud na magkaparehas. pero ang unod TS sa pagtulon-an si Kristo ang gipatigbabaw. Hinumdomi TS nga dako kaayog kalambigitan si Paul sa Apostolic Ages. siya ang gitawag nga Apostle of Gentiles ..mangutana ka ngano? tungod kay siya ang naay dakong katakos nga makapakalat sa Pagtulon-an ni Kristo diha sa mga Gentiles sama nato.

Ang problema ngano daghan man doctrina si Paul na ga contradict sa mga teachings ni Jesus ug sa apostles. Actually kung gamiton nato imong logic - tanan Zealots/Anti-Christ nalang unta ang gi tirahan niya ug milagro tapos gipili unta niya tong mga nephilim sa Noahs flood - ngano si Noah pa iyang gipili.

Noah was chosen because he was the most righteous man on earth.(Genesis 7:1). God choose sheep/lost sheep not psychopathic killers/blasphemer and a heartless pharisee.

[WengIA]

@Attiv: Bai kung ingon ana imong concept kang Paul nga ni contradict siya sa pagtulon-an ni Cristo.. sama ra pud ka niingon nga si Jesus Christ ni Contradict pud sa pagtulon-an sa iyang amahan..balansehon sa nato ha... si Paul lagi bai mabutang na sya nga Godsend ngadto sa mga Gentiles sa pagtulon-an ni Cristo karon mangutana ko kung contradict pa ang iyang pagtulon-an ..wala ba niabot sa ato ang pagtulon-an ni Cristo? perteng pagkaabuta kung contradict pa na wa na nato gisunod ang pagtulon-an ni Cristo pud. og dili jud na makahatag og kaayohan ang pagtulon-an ni Paul ngadto sa mga Gentile sa mata sa Ginoo .Wala lang jud kang kasabot sa Purpose nga gihatag sa Ginoo diha kang Paul mao nay pagkatinuod. ang 12 ka apostoles lahi sila og Purpose og si Paul lahi pud og Purpose. walay contradictory nga nahitabo brod attiv it is just nga lahi na lang ang pamaagi og aprroach sa pagtulon-an. mao nay giingon bai nga kung lahi na gani ang saserdote lahi na jud pud na ang pagdumala.pero mao rang istoryha para ra gihapon sa kahimayaan sa Pangalan ni Cristo. Ang calling ni Paul bai lahi ra sa calling sa 12 ka apostoles. ngano niabot man nuon ka sa Noah's Flood nga lahi man ilang sitwasyon simang ra kaayo na. ay kog ingna mas bright pa kas Ginoo bai? magbuot man nuon ka kinsay pilion Niya nga siya may mas bright pa kay sa nato.