Palit namo ani ASUS ROG Swift PG278Q, Nag tan.aw kos CES 2014 sa ASUS

[M.A.D.]

---

wow nindota aning narrow bezel monitors oi sakto kaayo para pang tri or quad monitor setup para daytrading.

puhon kung dako nako ug kta palit kog monitor na narrow bezel.

[lloyd_joy]

^ kun narrow bezel lang ang gipangita bro... naa'y daghan barato na offerings ang AOC... hehehe...

[LordZhen]

This monitor is not IPS. I was expecting something better. I'm kinda disappointed. US $799 is an awful price for a TN, even with all features (1440p and G-Sync).

i agree, much better gihapon ang asus pb278q p.l.s monitor ani

[harhar]

This monitor is not IPS. I was expecting something better. I'm kinda disappointed. US $799 is an awful price for a TN, even with all features (1440p and G-Sync).

Mao ni ilang gi rason...


Why is the display TN rather than IPS/PVA/MVA, etc?

Not all TN’s are made the same: the premium panel used in the PG278Q is of very high quality. IPS panels (and their derivatives like PVA/MVA etc) are not suitable for a multitude of reasons: 1) the response rate is simply not fast enough to react to the active change in refresh rate and 2) They cannot reliably achieve >60Hz without significantly affecting the quality of the image. IGZO technology (and LTPS – low temperature polysilicon – likewise) – yields 100′s of times faster electron mobility versus standard amorphous silicon panels – and thus can provide a response rate comparable to TN (up to 60Hz currently), but, however desirable this technology is, it is still currently cost prohibitively for many PC gaming enthusiasts in 2014, which is why ROG has used a better price performance, high quality TN panel.

[LordZhen]

Mao ni ilang gi rason...


Why is the display TN rather than IPS/PVA/MVA, etc?

Not all TN’s are made the same: the premium panel used in the PG278Q is of very high quality. IPS panels (and their derivatives like PVA/MVA etc) are not suitable for a multitude of reasons: 1) the response rate is simply not fast enough to react to the active change in refresh rate and 2) They cannot reliably achieve >60Hz without significantly affecting the quality of the image. IGZO technology (and LTPS – low temperature polysilicon – likewise) – yields 100′s of times faster electron mobility versus standard amorphous silicon panels – and thus can provide a response rate comparable to TN (up to 60Hz currently), but, however desirable this technology is, it is still currently cost prohibitively for many PC gaming enthusiasts in 2014, which is why ROG has used a better price performance, high quality TN panel.

again advertisement, and then again keep using ROG to make the price higher, for a TN the price is just awfully high

[Archfear]

ROG is the only way to carry this to market... What happened to you ROG? You're supposed to be on the side of the gamers... giving ubersome feature though in a premium price but this is not it.. hehe..