Using mobile phones in banks is a Constitutional right

[taga_ipil]

---

By ROD VERADecember 1, 2013 2:36pm

Picture this: You are in line at your local bank, waiting for your turn to pay that darn mobile phone bill.


Atty. Rod Vera
As you read the mysterious charges billed to you, the intolerable ring tone you chose is heard from your pocket. You struggle to answer your phone, making sure the cash doesn’t fall from your other hand. As you swipe your finger sideways on the screen, a guard gives you a dirty look and motions that you can’t answer the phone.

Has this happened to you? If it has, welcome to the club. Well, as for me, I want that club to be extinct

read more

[trinalla]

i think, its for security reason why banks don't allow using celfons.

[Xaxal Eternitum]

i think, its for security reason why banks don't allow using celfons.

Probably to ensure that robbers don't have a way to case the bank readily from the inside.

[salbahis]

By ROD VERADecember 1, 2013 2:36pm

Picture this: You are in line at your local bank, waiting for your turn to pay that darn mobile phone bill.


Atty. Rod Vera
As you read the mysterious charges billed to you, the intolerable ring tone you chose is heard from your pocket. You struggle to answer your phone, making sure the cash doesn’t fall from your other hand. As you swipe your finger sideways on the screen, a guard gives you a dirty look and motions that you can’t answer the phone.

Has this happened to you? If it has, welcome to the club. Well, as for me, I want that club to be extinct

read more

i hope you just posted this and not sharing with your own opinion..

you dont like it? dont go to bank... bank are private institution... di ka kaboot, walay kay pag boot, ug wala kay katungod if mao jud na ila policy...

would you like me to take a sh!t in your house? after all its my constitutional right...

[taga_ipil]

sometimes people just need to read before commenting...

it's obvious I was sharing it.. the lawyer who wrote that column has a point.

clicking the link will direct you to the article written by Atty. Rod De Vera.

and your comparison does not make sense by the way.

read article... and present your argument there.

[R_sQuArEd]

i hope you just posted this and not sharing with your own opinion..

you dont like it? dont go to bank... bank are private institution... di ka kaboot, walay kay pag boot, ug wala kay katungod if mao jud na ila policy...

would you like me to take a sh!t in your house? after all its my constitutional right...

nibasa naka sa article?

[taga_ipil]

^^ hahaha... mo basa palang cguro.. paeta.

[R_sQuArEd]

sometimes people just need to read before commenting...

it's obvious I was sharing it.. the lawyer who wrote that column has a point.

clicking the link will direct you to the article written by Atty. Rod De Vera.

and you comparison does not make sense btw.

read article... and present your argument there.

mao jud ni akong reaction

[ondoy]

ka saba ra kha kau kung daghan ga linya unya ny ga accept ug call tpos ga chika ra ....btw,yman ni abot ug tae?

[<SMILE>]

“The privacy of communication and correspondence shall be inviolable except upon lawful order of the court, or when public safety or order requires otherwise, as prescribed by law.”

I think this provision already clarify the issue.
If the intention of the bank is for safety and order to prevent robbery and probable loss of life,
then it's quite impossible to challenge the ruling.