The Chemical Attack & Massacre of Damascus

[godwhacker]

Commonsense tells me that Assad is not stupid enough to use chemical weapons.
1)Syrian Arab Army is winning the war.
2)UN Inspectors just arrived in Damascus.

Its just the West is so desperate to make a justification! Just to please Israel and the house of Saud which is financing the Alqaeda linked jihadist.

Last May Al-Nusra front was caught with sarin gas in Turkey.

And lastly there is no evidence that Assad's forces is the one who used the chemical weapons and Obama jumped on the gun directly because his redline was crossed?

Thats why UK MPs rejected the idea of joining with the US. And France it seems wont participate either.

Blow to Cameron's authority as MPs rule out British assault on Syria | Politics | theguardian.com

according to a report, it was saudi's prince bandar who gave the chemical to the mercenaries they are financing. unfortunately, due to mishandling of the chemicals by ignorant persons, it exploded and killed people. syrian government became the scapegoat...

Saudi Prince Bandar behind chemical attack in Syria: Report

[pak88]

Murag madayon man gyapon ang limited airstrikes sa U.S. maski wala support from other nations. Its defenses will be worse than the Iraq war during the last war since the Syrian army can't even hold the whole country together. It has obsolete air defenses just like Iraq had and if it collapses during the airstrikes, the country will possibly be another quagmire with a fundamentalist Muslim leadership in charge.

[bleedingboi]

according to a report, it was saudi's prince bandar who gave the chemical to the mercenaries they are financing. unfortunately, due to mishandling of the chemicals by ignorant persons, it exploded and killed people. syrian government became the scapegoat...

Saudi Prince Bandar behind chemical attack in Syria: Report

I really do not believe what these links say.

Press TV has been the subject of several controversies, including allegations of anti-Semitism and anti-Sunnism. The station forms the propaganda arm of the Iranian government. It has been criticized for its anti-Americanism and uncritical embrace of conspiracy theories.

This is the same station that said Bush and Bin Laden were cousins. And the Bildenberg group roasted human babies and coated them with gold before being served as dinner. Ridiculous, right?

[godwhacker]

I really do not believe what these links say.

Press TV has been the subject of several controversies, including allegations of anti-Semitism and anti-Sunnism. The station forms the propaganda arm of the Iranian government. It has been criticized for its anti-Americanism and uncritical embrace of conspiracy theories.

This is the same station that said Bush and Bin Laden were cousins. And the Bildenberg group roasted human babies and coated them with gold before being served as dinner. Ridiculous, right?

and you want me to believe in CNN? lols

[newbie.86]

guys ..........befor mo mag lalis diha ug mau .... read this first

Arab Spring: Death to humanity | Arab News

you can also include FOX (faux) news, BBC, and other major networks. they have turned into nothing but "state propaganda" similar to the government owned stations in China and north korea. remember they were the ones who exaggereated the reports on WMD during the bush admin.

just one advice -- listen to all sides BUT believe little.
i know both parties are hiding a lot from the common masses.
both parties are not telling everything and im sure of that.

- - - Updated - - -

though i disagree, i think the US will push through with a "limited" and narrow strike against syria.

[æRLO]

you can also include FOX (faux) news, BBC, and other major networks. they have turned into nothing but "state propaganda" similar to the government owned stations in China and north korea. remember they were the ones who exaggereated the reports on WMD during the bush admin.

just one advice -- listen to all sides BUT believe little.
i know both parties are hiding a lot from the common masses.
both parties are not telling everything and im sure of that.

- - - Updated - - -

though i disagree, i think the US will push through with a "limited" and narrow strike against syria.

so are we supposed to get our news from the old lady down the street that charges 5 pesos for her sessions?

It's okay to gather your news from ANY media...mainstream, underground, etc. just as long as you take them with a grain of salt.
people criticized Al Jazeera for anti-semitism, people criticized BBC for being too pro-west, people criticized FOX News for being too right-wing, and then CNN and MSNBC for holding liberal bias. Yes, they certainly do have biases...but doesn't mean everything of what they report is not true. That's where your discerning and comprehending abilities come into play.

[blu bizcuitz]

UN Inspection Team leaves Syria, let's wait for the results.

[Renz8]

I agree there is no way that these powers will have a direct confrontation. Its more on a proxy war.
US/UK/France will ideally use cruise missiles from ships and subs to destroy air defence and command structure. Just like what Clinton did against former US buddy Saddam Hussein in the peak of Lewinsky scandal.

Regarding the Chinese Embassy bombing in Belgrade, its not accidental. It was a CIA airstrike request.



Wow. Make sure to read what i have suggested before making an opinion. Don't rely too much on mainstream media.
If you're really interested in geopolitics arena then have some time to read and analyze on what went wrong.

Been reading geopolitics for way too long but you on the other hand is out of touch w/reality you want to live in a perfect world go to sleep&keep dreaming............

[newbie.86]

ha ?!?! what are you trying to say ?? that i won't believe in any news network nor even a word from an arab !!??

HA?!?!? Basahag kunog tarong akong gi post. Pataka raman ka og interpret.

#readingcomprehension101

and we should believe in you

whatever floats your boat.

goodluck!

- - - Updated - - -

so are we supposed to get our news from the old lady down the street that charges 5 pesos for her sessions?

yes you sure can -- but NO. read my post again.

It's okay to gather your news from ANY media...mainstream, underground, etc. just as long as you take them with a grain of salt.

Right on.

people criticized Al Jazeera for anti-semitism, people criticized BBC for being too pro-west, people criticized FOX News for being too right-wing, and then CNN and MSNBC for holding liberal bias. Yes, they certainly do have biases...but doesn't mean everything of what they report is not true. That's where your discerning and comprehending abilities come into play.

Yep... like i said -- listen to all sides BUT believe little. Cross-referencing is a form of intelligence.