Aquino wants Arroyo, other 'big fish' jailed - report

[omar50071]

Bro Apollo24, ang gusto nilang Romeojin ug monroy nga ma husgahan una sa hukmanan si GMA before nimo cya ingnon na corrupt.
Gusto nila parehas sa kaso ni ERAP nga naa nay desisyon sa korte. Pero ang wala nila masabti nga wala man ta sa korte, naa man ta sa forum, we do not present facts in the internet, we only give our opinions based on data coming from media or personal experience. Mag sakit man gud ilang dughan duha kay sa akong tan-aw mga die hard fanatics mana silang potot!

[monroy]

Well you don't know me at all then, OMAR. Many of my posts have been highly critical of Arroyo. I even think she is guilty. But like I said, thinking she is guilty is different from calling her guilty or proclaiming the evidence against her is strong, even if you haven't personally seen the evidence yourself. And of course, we're going to adapt court lingo and standard of evidence, because this thread in this forum is discussing a CASE THAT IS IN COURT. Does the title say "Aquino wants Arroyo subject to public stoning and death by mob violence?" No fool, it says "Aquino wants Arroyo JAILED" and to jail someone for good you require a COURT decision which requires a high standard of evidence than just "oh I think she's guilty, because ABS-CBN told me so or his highness Noynoy said so"

Look I'm not gonna waste any more time on this. This thread has clearly been infested with *****s of the highest order.

[Romeojin]

kung bata ko ikaw tiguwang na way buot

di guilty si GMA like you concur which means di siya corrupt. kay wa pa verdict. nganong nag sige man ka corrupt sa entire forum ? ? ha kasabot na ka?


ingon diay ko dili pareho priso(detain) ang hospital arrest ? ? ikaw hinuon nag-ingon tungod "strong evidence" di siya kagawas. kapila na ingnan from other thread tungod sa "non-bailable" ang reason. ako tawon nag-una anang "non-bailable" gi follow lang nimo kay ulaw man gud.

tagai kami link na strong ang evidence ?

kanang radaza ongoing na case na. di nimo i compare sa cases na dili pa ongoing or wa pa preliminary. once na ongoing dinha na mahibaw-an ang strength sa case. alangan moingon ang lawyer ni Radaza na strong ang evidence against niya when wa pa nagstart

[Apollo24]

OT: Sori Mods for OT.. I'm hoping lang na maksabot na tawon ni sila kay I do believe na bisan unsa kagahi sa ulo mohumok ra jud na madugay... Sama sa usa ka Batong Bantilis na bisan sa iyang kagahi pero sa inanay na tulo sa ulan maupos ra gihapon... Pero kung tan-aw nimo Mods sobra rako then I'm willing to accept the infraction...
OnT: Lisora pasabton woi.... Ang ka Radaza gi dismiss sa Sandiganbayan kay weak daw ang mga supporting documents na produce... Ang ilang GMA ug Gwen Garcia ni prosper ilang kaso so lig-on ang tan-aw sa Ombudsman ug Sandiganbayan.. Mao na nakaingon ko na lig-on ang mga ebidensya kay ni prosper naman.....
Kusog ko moingon na Corrupt si GMA ug Gwen Garcia tungod sa finding sa Ombudsman na naay probable cause sa Corruption na ilang nahimo.. ​Pero wala moy nabasa na comment nako na nigamit ko ug Convicted or Guilty silang duha tungod sa Technicality ana na term na ang Korte na ang may final say....
Tungod sa strong na mga ebidences then naabot sa taas ang kaso ni GMA ug dili sya kagawas tungod kay Plunder man na.... Mao na gipriso....

[æRLO]

Bro Apollo24, ang gusto nilang Romeojin ug monroy nga ma husgahan una sa hukmanan si GMA before nimo cya ingnon na corrupt.
Gusto nila parehas sa kaso ni ERAP nga naa nay desisyon sa korte. Pero ang wala nila masabti nga wala man ta sa korte, naa man ta sa forum, we do not present facts in the internet, we only give our opinions based on data coming from media or personal experience. Mag sakit man gud ilang dughan duha kay sa akong tan-aw mga die hard fanatics mana silang potot!

yes, and the counter-argument is that it is taking far too long too conjure, err I mean gather the alleged evidences. It seriously shouldn't take that long to put a case this high-profile into the courts. But It's been 3 years. Here's the only facts that matter...

The administration is very anti-defendant (GMA), throwing everything it can to slander the defendant outside the court. Railroading the case shouldn't be a problem, granted there is substantial evidence. It shouldn't take this long, this case should have been in the courts at least over a year ago if it is true that the prosecutors have "gross" amounts of "strong" evidences at their disposal, as it was proclaimed. Seriously, make this sh*t happen--I want to know if GMA is truly guilty or truly innocent of these allegations thrown upon her. At this point in time, anyone who says, with complete certainty, that she is either or, is worthy of being called a dunce.

I suppose that there are individuals who like to render their verdicts before the trial has even materialized--in other words nag tagna2x. Don't put yourselves in a situation where you will have to eat your own words.

[Apollo24]

so, naay posibilidad nga mahuman na lang iyang term, suspects gihapon ang mga nagbuhat ato nga krimen?

Sakto gyud ka sir... Kay naa man gud tay gitawag na Due Process wala may shortcut.... ingon pa nila Justice Delay, Justice Deny ... Consuelo lang sa mga Biktima kay gipriso naman na sila .. Ang biktima sa mga Ampatuan ang mga relatives sa ilang gipamatay...Ang biktima ni GMA kita mismo.... Mao na dugay kaayo ma resolve ang mga kaso tungod sa Due process na taas kaayo...

[<SMILE>]

The people can make their own interpretation of what was revealed,
but the final decision goes to the court.
It's quite difficult to penalize personalities with such influence,
they have the means to defend themselves.

[omar50071]

Well you don't know me at all then, OMAR. Many of my posts have been highly critical of Arroyo. I even think she is guilty. But like I said, thinking she is guilty is different from calling her guilty or proclaiming the evidence against her is strong, even if you haven't personally seen the evidence yourself. And of course, we're going to adapt court lingo and standard of evidence, because this thread in this forum is discussing a CASE THAT IS IN COURT. Does the title say "Aquino wants Arroyo subject to public stoning and death by mob violence?" No fool, it says "Aquino wants Arroyo JAILED" and to jail someone for good you require a COURT decision which requires a high standard of evidence than just "oh I think she's guilty, because ABS-CBN told me so or his highness Noynoy said so"

Ato klarohon be, you think GMA is guilty and deserves time in jail, but does not wanna call her guilty unless proven in court, right? I dunno man, i think you are being technical about it. You must have some reason behind in thinking she is guilty (dont worry, evidence not necessary). Calling her guilty in the forums is not all the same as guilty in court, its just public opinion, so please don't go haywire about it.

The title says:
"Aquino wants Arroyo JAILED" which is also similar to "omar50071 wants Arroyo JAILED" or "Apollo24 wants Arroyo JAILED". How do you think we are gonna do that? Yes you are right, by gathering substantial evidence, in which among the three of us, only Aquino has the capacity, in terms of resources. What I am saying is, we rally behind him for this particular cause.

Look I'm not gonna waste any more time on this. This thread has clearly been infested with *****s of the highest order.

Gee thanks man, makes me wonder who you really are in person.

[Romeojin]

pero kung GMA, walay due process. guilty diretso. dile mag-update2x sa news nadismiss na diay.

Hypocrisy

I wonder why would someone react on this, when this is pretty much truthful


naa pa gyud...ok lang pud magpataka dire omar ?

*** Special Politics & Current Events Rules ***

You may not post propaganda materials here.
You may not post anything political into non-political threads (this includes lame references / jokes) unless you can directly link it with the circumstances involved.
When posting articles about current events or news, please, please cite your sources (e.g. website links, book names, page numbers, etc.)! We're no tabloid but we're also no CNN/AFP either. So let's keep everything in the middle; cite your sources for any news or current events that you post.
No profanity.

[æRLO]

Ato klarohon be, you think GMA is guilty and deserves time in jail, but does not wanna call her guilty unless proven in court, right? I dunno man, i think you are being technical about it. You must have some reason behind in thinking she is guilty (dont worry, evidence not necessary). Calling her guilty in the forums is not all the same as guilty in court, its just public opinion, so please don't go haywire about it.

The title says:
"Aquino wants Arroyo JAILED" which is also similar to "omar50071 wants Arroyo JAILED" or "Apollo24 wants Arroyo JAILED". How do you think we are gonna do that? Yes you are right, by gathering substantial evidence, in which among the three of us, only Aquino has the capacity, in terms of resources. What I am saying is, we rally behind him for this particular cause.


Gee thanks man, makes me wonder who you really are in person.

and no wonder the Philippines is a messed up place.

Folks like you think it's perfectly fine to propagate speculations/allegations prima facie and before the fact. In this case, let's abolish the entire Philippine Judiciary system since apparently we can deem someone guilty even before it is scrutinized in court.

And here I was thinking that the Philippine civil laws guaranteed a presumption of innocence. Guess not.