Was Peter went to ROME?

[Breakeven]

@ fri13th, macho papa man kaau...Lol

mao jud ning pormaha gihapon sa iyang old avatar bro...pang chix jud tingali ni kang @fri13th! joke bro ha.

[Breakeven]

@noy

noy;14682539]mao lagi bro, UNLESS you would study the catechism of the CATHOLIC CHURCH, you would always percieve RCC as a contradiction...hinlabi nag apilan nimug browse2x sa mga ANTI-Catholic sites...NAKO!!!!!! Lol

Just think of the early christian martyrs under the iron fist of Rome bro...
Truth Screams to be known - NOT FOR CHILDREN TO WATCH - YouTube

Kasabot rako bro nga dili pa nimo Makita ang sayop nga teachings coz grabe ka complex ang ilang deception. Why I say deception? Coz we put our trust to people who hide things from us. Wala ta kahibalo what’s their ultimate agenda kay sa imoha pa, moingon raman do we hold the absolute truth? Sa tinuod, atong kwarta mao ray gigamit nila to boost their power to control the world. The history of man and its doom has been written in the bible. We know that Jesus Christ reminds us to know these truths for it will set us free.

Vatican- Owner of world's biggest banks and top companies [Catholic Church Exposed] - YouTube

Let me ask you bro, would you still put your trust to people who are hiding something from you? In the process of electing a new Pope, haven’t you asked yourself why doing it in a conclave and not public? Is it for formality sake nga kunuhay naay cardinals Makita nga nibotar and after the final decision is made by few individual sunugon pa jud ilang papel...para walay ebidensya? what do you think is the best explaination for it if there’s no hidden agenda? can you please enlighten me bro.

i won't argue with you further kay maikog tang defender(TS) and Mod(Master Spring)
i'll leave you with this: To My "Bible Only" Christian Brothers and Sisters, From A Catholic Convert [a humble vanity], not an official catholic site but insights from someone who used to be anti-catholic.
cge back to the topic na ta break, kay maikog ta...cge unsa may imung personal stand about ni Peter going to Rome?

Wala may problema sa ako bro if Peter has gone to Rome or not. Akoa lang, if the claims of the RCC conforms with the bible or not. The better way to find the answer is to read the epistles of Apostle Peter kung kana nga teachings gi promote ba niya. What the people needs to hear is the TRUTH not LIES….that’s our purpose why we reach out to them coz we want our fellow Christians understand what true Christianity is all about.

to get right with God is what the world needs today....


INTERVIEW WITH FORMER ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIESTS & A NUN ON WHY THEY LEFT THE CHURCH OF ROME - YouTube

[newbie.86]

what about the tomb found in a certain Monastery in the Mt. of Olives in Jerusalem that said to have housed the remains of St. Peter?

Bro, no seriious scholar of Biblical archaeology would consider the tomb of " Peter" in Mt Olives as the real thing. Scholarly studies reveal that the tomb been known to be owned by Simon Bar Zilla, and not by Simon Bar Jonah.


Whose son is Simon?

[Xian120]

Bro, no seriious scholar of Biblical archaeology would consider the tomb of " Peter" in Mt Olives as the real thing. Scholarly studies reveal that the tomb been known to be owned by Simon Bar Zilla, and not by Simon Bar Jonah.


Whose son is Simon?

look, i dont read aramaic but all sources say it's Simon Bar Jonah..

[SioDenz]

1 million likes bro! Lol

@break, this is coming from a Christian baptized in a pentecostal church since birth. .

wa juy problem nang differences oi...ang problema is when we start pointing fingers without even getting the FULL perspective.

Ang problema is if we close our minds when discussing ideas and belief. We may have the FULL perspective, but if that perspective is exclusively based on the ideas that were implanted on our brains since we were young and Not from our own - then we may Not find the truth.

[deadspace]

no.. naa siya sa ako luyo hheheh

[deadspace]

tinood?ssssssssssss

[newbie.86]

look, i dont read aramaic but all sources say it's Simon Bar Jonah..

experts mismo ang nag confirm bro... that is why your argument does not hold water anymore.

whatever your sources are (definitely anti-catholic) has been proven wrong again in the light of scientific and intellectual truths.

[<SMILE>]

The religion did able to convert
a very fearsome emperor before into the folds
of christianity by way of the cross itself.
Eventually he grasp that life as a christian,
thus it was named after the kingdom where he is reigning,
The roman empire. He was converted and thus the Roman Catholicism
was born, and did start in Rome and continued through the administration
of the papacy.
The religion was started because of christianity and continued
because of christianity, then why is the question?
and of course through even valid scientific proof Saint Peter was there
as Simon Peter starting the established faith of Jesus Christ.

Can we invalidate something made by a converted person
who diverted and believe towards Jesus Christ?,
censuring such a gesture is the same as questioning
our very faith for Jesus Christ and thus for me really a not so good
an idea, for we should have that total faith without question or fault
finding to make our belief absolute.

[Breakeven]

@smile

Sakto man bro but people make mistakes. Only God knows the depths of our hearts.
Sometimes naay taw ma convert but not totally putting their trust.....naay tendency they would still cling to their cherished old beliefs or merged with the new one. Labi na kung masagulan ug political interest.