cge kani..., naay proof nga si Peter niadtu sa Rome according sa early Christian writings of the church fathers..dated down to the 1st century..
naa puy archeological find through sa remains ni St. Peter, which has been verieifed by experts and has been declared nga mao jud to...
unsa may proof sa opposing team? kay kung bible ra atong basehan,
dili lang ang kinabuhi ug kamatayun ni St. Peter atong i dispute, hasta tanang kinabuhi ug kamatayon sa ubang apostoles as per History
kay kung wa ko masayop sa mga apostoles ni Jesus..kang Judas Iscariot rang kamatayon ang nahisulat sa Bibliya..
unsa may buhaton nato atong mga early Christian writings? ato tong ibaliwala lang?
unya ilang mga writings were verified to be legit man nga ila jung sinuwat.(i search ninyo)
should it follow nga nangatik to cla? unsay purpose kung maohon?
how is it nga sa mga sinuwat sa mga early church fathers..kay naa man juy unison?
in other words, it has been proven nga St.Peter went to Rome, became the head of the Roman Church and was martyrd
what are the proofs that St. Peter didn't go to Rome aside from biblical verses, clues with personal interpretation?




Reply With Quote


