well said densyo!!.. keep posting guyz daghan gyud ko makat-onan ninyo bahin sa bible dah.
well said densyo!!.. keep posting guyz daghan gyud ko makat-onan ninyo bahin sa bible dah.
sio, even sa old testament books, na foretold na ngadto nga ang messias ilansang..ug patyon kauban sa mga criminal, biay-biayon, lud.an ug uban pa
meaning i treat Siya as pinaka ubos sa tanang ubos..
i'm not sure kung uso na bang crucifixion sa OT but sa panahon ni Jesus(messias natong mga Christiano) ang pinaka ubos nga paagi sa pagpatay sa usa ka criminal ang paglansang...
so kung gi pa nagna na sa karaang kasabutan ang pag abut sa messias, pagsakripisyo, ug pagpakamatay unsaon pagkamatay ug ang pagkabanhaw...
meaning hasta mismo ang CROSS, apil na sa pagpili sa Ginoo...
kung mutoo ka perfect ang will sa Ginoo, so tanang nahitabo-mahitabo, iya nang gi allow according to His plan..
God doesn't wait for circumstances to decide 'cause He is all knowing.
wa man ko muingun nga kinahanglan ug symbols ang tao para maka simba sa Diyos...
so i don't see the relevance about the verse where we should worship God in spirit and in truth in our discussion
ang atong topic kay ang cross isip simbolo sa kaluwasan sa Diyos, as the original topic goes...
nga though ang cross naay pagan roots...ok ra sa ato nga Chrsitians 'cause it signifies the victory of Christ over sin.
in the same way mao ang obelisk, though pagan symbol ug naay pagan roots...di na mu matter
kay naa ni siya diha sa Rome sa st.peter's basilica, dili para simbahon kundi para mag simbolo sa mga nangamatay alang sa gospel..
sama sa Cross, when i see the cross, it reminds me of Jesus Love for me...so moduol ko atubangan sa cross ug feel nako moluhod, moluhod ko..BUT it dopesn't mean nga akong gi worship ang CROSS, i worship Jesus who died for on the Cross...
BUT thank God for the cross, 'cause when i see it..i would always end up remembering His Love for me.
ug sama sa obelisk didto sa Rome atbang sa St. peter's basilica..we don't see it as a pagan symbol but
a silent witness of how the apostle peter and early Christians were martyrd..
murag kahoy gud nga 150 years old..maka ingun ta nga di lang nato ni putlon oi...kay witness bya ni sa
mga revolutions sa atong nasod for freedom..
Last edited by noy; 03-22-2013 at 05:44 PM.
Literally Jesus Christ died in the cross,
but look at the meaning of his death,
Jesus Christ's death is our salvation from Sins,
we could not discredit that as Cristians,
it's even the mere foundation of our faith.
The cross symbolizes our redemption from our sins
because through it and the sufferings the notion of salvation was realized.
exactly what i was talking about bai..Perspective!
for you we worship saints, but we Do Not..
for you there's something occultic behind the Obelisk, but para namu wala ra na..historical and sentimental reasons ray nagpaluyo nganu naa na siya sa St.Peter's Basilica
mao di jud nimu madawat ang akong explanation isip RC tungod kay lahi imung POV..ana ra na.
mao nag ask ko nimu if how sure are you with what you consider to be the truth(minor doctrines and differences, tungod kay isip Chrsitiano, ang atong absolute truth kay ang nahisuwat sa John3:16)..
think about this bai, if naa pa nay di mao nga purpose ang Obelisk, naa na unta nay significance sa Catholic doctrines.. in terms of something spiritual, i agree..But no principality nor evil power can break into God's loce and grace..in the same way nga tungod sa gahum sa Diyos
ang cross nga naay pagan and shameful roots, was totally changed when Jesus died on it..
mao pud na ang kaso sa Obelisk, kung sa una gi himu nang sombolo sa mga pagan sa sun worship, karun gihimu nang historical attraction
sa pag hinumdum sa mga Chrsitian Martyrs..
kung mao nay imung pagtan.aw anang butanga, way kinsang demonyo nga maka sukol ana..kung para nimu ang cross nag simbolo sa atong kaluwasan, No pagan or shameful History can overtake you when you see the cross..
do you think ang RCC maoy magpasiugda anang new world order bai?
the RCC even stood against RH bill unya maki sama na nuon sa new world order nga conspiracy?
magsugod na sa mga humanitarian programs bai, focusing on the welfare of the people maski pag maligsan ang religious morals,separation of church and state, hangtud i suppress na any religious roots and eventually wagtangon na...
kung ang RCC mi uyon pa ani, then ning uyon unta ang RCC sa RH.
this is off topic though but i had to share this as an example to relay my point.
so kadtong mga wa naka satisfy nimu sa ilang mga tubag, dili to mga true Christians? Lol
ok, then why limit yourselves to your church/denominations perspective?
in other words, you think RCC is a non-biblical church?
there are always 2 sides of the coin bro, the RCC is not exempted from it. maski ikaw,ako ug kinsa pa na diha, naay flesh ug naay spirit.
all i can say is if you think that RCC promotes and tolerates occultic scenes..then as a practicing RC Christian, i'm afraid sayop imung huna-huna bro.
Salamat pud bro, mao nang ganahan jud ko magkig storya nimu kay kabalo ka mupalapad sa atong atay..Lol
agree with justice and Love. but the problem is our views on justice and love is very limited and insignificant compared to God's
reching out to others is very mysterious jud bro, only God can define it..sometimes we see it as compromise but it is really an act of love..
sometimes we see something as an act of love but it was actually out of pride.
mao simple ra jud kaayo gihatag ni Kuya Jes, Love God above all and others as we love ourselves,
bro, sa link pa lang daan, klaro na jud kaayo nga Anti-Catholicism. mao
kung mao nay imung basehan..eventually you'll become one.
no problem.
amen.
OT:unya kakita naka sa itsura?
Last edited by noy; 03-22-2013 at 07:09 PM.
hehehe mubo ra jud ni atoa hehehe kapoyan man gud ko type...Yep I remembered that the crowds requested the release of a notorious criminal over Jesus but how sure are you that the crowds were all Jews? In my observation there were other races who attended the gathering not just Jews as per as your previous statement.
![]()
The importance of the Cross does have significance only during the crucifixion of Jesus and from there it became the symbol of Christ sacrifice and salvation...simple as that...syaro!
Nganong lisoron pa jud pagsabot oi.
The Vatican Obelisk stands as an expression of the conquering power of the Church. It is neither an object of worship or veneration in the Church.
English translation of the Latin inscription:
Pope Sixtus V (Supreme Pontiff)
Obelisk of Vatican
richly adorned by the Gentiles
To the threshold of the Apostles
The labor of thing laboriously carried away
1586, 2nd year of his pontificate.
Behold the Cross of the Lord!
go into exile ye hostile powers!
The Lion of the tribe of Judah hath prevailed!
Christ conquers,
Christ is King,
Christ is Emperor!
May Christ protect His
people from all evil!"
pasensya bro dugay ko makareply usahay coz i currently suffer from intermittent internet connection, akong laptop naa sad problema. This always happens everytime when I post some video links such as these....but no problem, we already knew who is in control and the prince of the power of the air...heheh.
@noy
How about Mary bro?exactly what i was talking about bai..Perspective! for you we worship saints, but we Do Not..
Maybe for some Catholics. How about those people mismo sa Vatican nga naay idea aning mga butanga?for you there's something occultic behind the Obelisk, but para namu wala ra na..historical and sentimental reasons ray nagpaluyo nganu naa na siya sa St.Peter's Basilica
VATICAN EXPOSED
That’s normal lang bro naay butang nga dili nato dawaton dayon, unless the evidence mo fit sa kamatuoran. My source of truth mostly is the bible. Ang lisud diha kung gi consider nato ang bible as God’s truth but we believe only halfheartedly.mao di jud nimu madawat ang akong explanation isip RC tungod kay lahi imung POV..ana ra na.
mao nag ask ko nimu if how sure are you with what you consider to be the truth(minor doctrines and differences, tungod kay isip Chrsitiano, ang atong absolute truth kay ang nahisuwat sa John3:16)..
Lisud man bro if di ta maka distinguish sa Paganism from Christianity. Remember that Roman Catholicism was originally formed by a Pagan Emperor Constantine. There is a big possibility of the corruption within the church.think about this bai, if naa pa nay di mao nga purpose ang Obelisk, naa na unta nay significance sa Catholic doctrines.. in terms of something spiritual, i agree..But no principality nor evil power can break into God's love and grace..
Obelisk, Religion, Masons, and pagan origins from Egypt to the Vatican! - YouTube
Unsa may connection sa Obelisk ug sa martyr, giunsa sila pagpatay using the obelisk?in the same way nga tungod sa gahum sa Diyos ang cross nga naay pagan and shameful roots, was totally changed when Jesus died on it..mao pud na ang kaso sa Obelisk, kung sa una gi himu nang sombolo sa mga pagan sa sun worship, karun gihimu nang historical attraction sa pag hinumdum sa mga Chrsitian Martyrs..
I agree if your point nagpasabot nga ang mga taw nga nagpaluyo and who worship that image, mao ang nagpapatay sa mga Christian martyrs. So it means nga ang obelisk dili diay related sa Christianity, instead, like the cross, is an abominable thing/symbol. If the cross refers to Jesus Christ, why man dili Giant Cross ang gibutang diha sa center sa Saint Peter Square? Taga Vatican ra tingali makatubag ani bro…heheh.
Wala silay gikahadlukan sa tanang butang/taw sa kalibutan, I think demons only shivers in the name or presence of the Lord Jesus Christ.kung mao nay imung pagtan.aw anang butanga, way kinsang demonyo nga maka sukol ana..kung para nimu ang cross nag simbolo sa atong kaluwasan, No pagan or shameful History can overtake you when you see the cross..
I assumed there are 2 forces nga naglihok sa Vatican bro. Murag politics ba.do you think ang RCC maoy magpasiugda anang new world order bai?
the RCC even stood against RH bill unya maki sama na nuon sa new world order nga conspiracy?
magsugod na sa mga humanitarian programs bai, focusing on the welfare of the people maski pag maligsan ang religious morals,separation of church and state, hangtud i suppress na any religious roots and eventually wagtangon na...
kung ang RCC mi uyon pa ani, then ning uyon unta ang RCC sa RH. this is off topic though but i had to share this as an example to relay my point.
Father John O'Connor: The Reign of the Antichrist - 1/9 - YouTube
Akong point bro, wala ko na satisfy sa ilang explaination not if theyre true or false Christians. It doesn’t mean nga kung hinayon ta dili tinuod atong pagka Christian. It happen lang nga mas maayo pagka explain sa ubang Christian denomination about the truths of the bible.So kadtong mga wa naka satisfy nimu sa ilang mga tubag, dili to mga true Christians? Lol
With all the videos akong gishare bro, about those people from inside the Vatican nag exposed sa ilang na observe, would you still hold fast to your perspective nga walay hidden agenda sa sulod? I do not limit my perspective bro, but I fixed my truth in Jesus Christ and the Bible. Kung wala tay fixed reference bro, tanang belief is acceptable….then why we disagree in Hinduism, Islam, Buddhism’s teachings?ok, then why limit yourselves to your church/denominations perspective?
It is. But not totally. Mao bitaw wala jud na gi-encourage sa unang panahon nga ipabasa, especially during the Dark Ages, maybe because mabaloan nga daghan conflicts sa mga teachings and practices.in other words, you think RCC is a non-biblical church?
Hopefully sayop ko. But truth will always find its way to surface. Let’s see what will happen in the near future. These are serious matters bro.there are always 2 sides of the coin bro, the RCC is not exempted from it. maski ikaw,ako ug kinsa pa na diha, naay flesh ug naay spirit. all i can say is if you think that RCC promotes and tolerates occultic scenes..then as a practicing RC Christian, i'm afraid sayop imung huna-huna bro.
Yes bro, only God knows. But what he reveals in the bible is very Clear. John 3:16, as you consider the absolute truth talks about the depth of the Love of God and the consequences of those who accepts/rejects it.agree with justice and Love. but the problem is our views on justice and love is very limited and insignificant compared to God's reching out to others is very mysterious jud bro, only God can define it..sometimes we see it as compromise but it is really an act of love..sometimes we see something as an act of love but it was actually out of pride.
mao simple ra jud kaayo gihatag ni Kuya Jes, Love God above all and others as we love ourselves,
Dili man tingali dautan ang paghatag ug link bro. Ang taw nga nangita jud sa kamatuoran will surely find it one day. Bisan pa pila pa ka information atong I share kung dili jud ta convinced, wala nay power sa atua.bro, sa link pa lang daan, klaro na jud kaayo nga Anti-Catholicism. mao
kung mao nay imung basehan..eventually you'll become one.
Makaingon ta sakto sad baya ang words ni George Mc Donald that says…” To give truth to him who loves it not, is only to give him more multiplied reasons for misinterpretations.”
I admire your brilliance bro and I hope we can come to the point nga magkauyon ta in viewing the truth in our discussion too.
Cheers and God bless us always!
Last edited by Breakeven; 03-23-2013 at 02:03 PM.
@noy
Nindot kayo ni sya bro kung tanang Katoliko pasabton ana nga explaination. At least masabtan nila ang pagan history ana nga Image nga nagpatunga sa Vatican....in the same way mao ang obelisk, though pagan symbol ug naay pagan roots...di na mu matter
kay naa ni siya diha sa Rome sa st.peter's basilica, dili para simbahon kundi para mag simbolo sa mga nangamatay alang sa gospel..
sama sa Cross, when i see the cross, it reminds me of Jesus Love for me...so moduol ko atubangan sa cross ug feel nako moluhod, moluhod ko..BUT it dopesn't mean nga akong gi worship ang CROSS, i worship Jesus who died for on the Cross...
BUT thank God for the cross, 'cause when i see it..i would always end up remembering His Love for me.
ug sama sa obelisk didto sa Rome atbang sa St. peter's basilica..we don't see it as a pagan symbol buta silent witness of how the apostle peter and early Christians were martyrd..
Ang nindot nga pangutana karon, kung ang mga leaders nga nagpaluyo ana nga symbol niuyon pa sa Christianity based sa imong gimention then why they suppress the preaching of the gospel? Kung ang Pope maka intervene in major conflicts in different countries, unsa may nabuhat sa Pope/church leaders about the Christian persecutions in these countries?
The Final Hour: Christianity - The Most Persecuted Religion In The Entire World
We should know that Christian persecution, beheading, etc will happen again in the future as prophesied in the book of Revelation once this “BEAST” power will be completely healed. Sad to say, but this is the FATE for the true Christians.
@smile
Wala jud bro. Unless kung naa ka sa layo unya naa kay sideline then pagtan-aw nimo sa picture na konsensya ka…hehehe. joke bro ha.Thanks sa verses Bro,Please let me portray it in the most practical way.
If naa koy uyab, unya magkalagyoay mi,dili na ko kakita niya,akong gibuhat gatago ko ug iyang picture sa akong pitaka, para sa panahon nga mingawon ko niya maoy akong tan-aw tan-awon,
sa akong gibuhat nakasala kaha ko sa akong uyab?
Kana madoble jud bro kay duha na ang picture imong gitago2.Dili kaha ang sala ana Bro,nga sa wala na ang akong uyab,kay nagkalagyoay man mi. nagtago ko ug picture sa laing babaye?
Ang pagsulti ni Jesus Christ to worship God in spirit and in truth sayon sabton ug klaro kayo bro. Why the need for an image/symbol kung mag ampo ka sa Ginoo? Ang point diha bro, bisan asa pa ta mahimutang, we can always bow down our heads and connect to God in spirit…dili na need nga dalhon2 nato ang cross or any symbol para ibutang sa atubangan in times we pray.How about God,sala ba diay nga maghimo ko ug representation niya kay dili na man nako siya makita?
peace bro!
Similar Threads |
|