First of all id like to point out that im speaking in behalf of myself..
I think ive explained it. It is based on consolidated principles from books, direct and vicarious experiences, teachings, and other sources.. If "thou shalt not kill" principle is accepted or becomes an established form of belief, then it becomes a guiding principle to people who will accept it, but that doesnt mean it wont be challenged by the individual's differing principles, people will always have different extent outlook as to what, why, how and when we should not kill..
Principles will always be challenged no matter how firmly established it is.. That is why there is no such thing as universal principle, coz people will always have their own varying guiding Principles, they may share a few but as to it's variation it is differing.
Last edited by Xian120; 12-18-2012 at 04:10 PM.
you mean to say these people's intelligence is below average?
List of Christian thinkers in science - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and these people who converted to Christianity from aetheism have renounced their intelligence?
List of converts to Christianity from atheism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
i hope i am making a point here.![]()
Last edited by noy; 12-18-2012 at 05:15 PM.
Last edited by noy; 12-18-2012 at 05:33 PM.
If God is real and if He created the universe and everything else...i think it's just right and logical
to not be able to grasp all sides of morality.
and if that's the case, what Jesus said about being blessed for believing despite of not seeing would make perfect sense.
personally i think Faith bridges the gap between what is infinite and finite.
though it is really posibile that absolutes doesnt exist,
but i think we can both agree bai that until there is uncertainty
the posiblity that it Does is always parallel..
Similar Threads |
|